[JJ]

 

[TheZookie007]

Quote:
pedonbio: And here's Chiharu:

 

Wow, stretch marks, tracery of veins, Japanese, huge nipples...what's not to like?

[G_Wille]

smells good


 

[MaxBigfoot]

Quote:
TheZookie007 said:

Quote:
pedonbio: And here's Chiharu:

 

Wow, stretch marks, tracery of veins, Japanese, huge nipples...what's not to like?

She's not in bed with any of us?  

[pedonbio]

Quote:
TheZookie007 said:

Quote:
pedonbio: Wow, stretch marks, tracery of veins, Japanese, huge nipples...what's not to like?

She's in Japan and we're not?

[JJ]

more bombers from above.............

[turbo]

Isn't Emma O'Neil quite enchanting?
 

[luvdemwhoppers]

Eden

[jjsmith]

from Google Earth

[Art Vandalay]

Quote:
jjsmith said:
from Google Earth

lol.

[pedonbio]

Quote:
jjsmith said:
from Google Earth

Is that real or a spoof? It looks genuine, and you could probably find that scene in that part of Amsterdam. But if it's real, this Google Earth thing has more promise than I thought.

[Art Vandalay]

Quote:
pedonbio said:

Quote:
jjsmith said:
from Google Earth

Is that real or a spoof? It looks genuine, and you could probably find that scene in that part of Amsterdam. But if it's real, this Google Earth thing has more promise than I thought.

LOL.  Look closely at the map icon....

 

[r2d2]

Actually it is from Google Maps street view, not Google Earth.

Judging from the fact that the image for that particular address is "no longer available" on Google Maps I would hazard a guess that, yes, it was real ...

[Palomine]

Quote:
r2d2 said:
Actually it is from Google Maps street view, not Google Earth.

Judging from the fact that the image for that particular address is "no longer available" on Google Maps I would hazard a guess that, yes, it was real ...

Without even a minute's research, I feel comfortable stating that it's a blatant fake for a few reasons, the most obvious of which is resolution: 1-meter resolution is generally just about the best possible available to the public via consumer channels (excepting certain sites/dates such as the WTC before/after 9/11). The resolution in THAT amusing photo is MUCH better than 1-meter... objects mere inches across are plainly visible. Thus, it seems VERY unlikely that while technologically possible, quality like that is reserved for military/intelligence eyes only.

The other giveaway (to me) is the angle of the shot. All satellite photography I've ever seen is taken from above... not from any significant angle other than 90 degrees (the line btwn subject and camera relative to the surface of the earth). This is no surprise, considering the orbital altitude that imagine satellites routinely operate at. To shoot at the indicated angle, the satellite would be pointing its camera well away from 90 degrees, which would require it to 'see' through a much thicker slice of atmosphere, degrading the image even further.

In all probability, the photo was taken from a building across the street, a bit down from, and a few stories above the woman's window, using a telephoto/zoom lens.

JMHO... if anyone determines that it IS a satellite photo, please post the details as I'd like to hear about it.  

[jjsmith]

Quote:
Palomine said:

Quote:
r2d2 said:
Actually it is from Google Maps street view, not Google Earth.

Judging from the fact that the image for that particular address is "no longer available" on Google Maps I would hazard a guess that, yes, it was real ...

Without even a minute's research, I feel comfortable stating that it's a blatant fake for a few reasons, the most obvious of which is resolution: 1-meter resolution is generally just about the best possible available to the public via consumer channels (excepting certain sites/dates such as the WTC before/after 9/11). The resolution in THAT amusing photo is MUCH better than 1-meter... objects mere inches across are plainly visible. Thus, it seems VERY unlikely that while technologically possible, quality like that is reserved for military/intelligence eyes only.

The other giveaway (to me) is the angle of the shot. All satellite photography I've ever seen is taken from above... not from any significant angle other than 90 degrees (the line btwn subject and camera relative to the surface of the earth). This is no surprise, considering the orbital altitude that imagine satellites routinely operate at. To shoot at the indicated angle, the satellite would be pointing its camera well away from 90 degrees, which would require it to 'see' through a much thicker slice of atmosphere, degrading the image even further.

In all probability, the photo was taken from a building across the street, a bit down from, and a few stories above the woman's window, using a telephoto/zoom lens.

JMHO... if anyone determines that it IS a satellite photo, please post the details as I'd like to hear about it.  

Well, if you look up the exact address Google has already blanked it out. Observe  http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Vishoek+12...&iwloc=addr

Clicking back a few steps shows that the rest of the street was filmed from a similar height (  http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Vishoek+12...372670807453455  ). I actually saw a Google streetview car driving around my neighborhood once and the cameras sit very high atop the car.

EDIT. More evidence (  http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Vishoek+12...271551716235206  ). Notice the redish bar along the window frame. Same as the photo. Yes, I believe this to be real.

Maybe  this guy  knows something about it. You can see the head of one of the dildos  here.