*

Tina

  • C Cup
  • 80
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #105 on: December 10, 2007, 06:33:34 PM »
Quote:

Legio said:
Quote:

G_I_John said:
Heck, THE Jana Defi creates a thread and posts in it and she has just under 4500 views in 5 days
Rachel > Jana ?

No necessarily so - the circumstances are different. We had already seen photos of Jana, but Rachel is new (apart from the picture and interview segment in 2005). Rachel is spectacularly lovely and the Pinup team have done a great job photographing her.

If Rachel ever found out about the respectful attitude of most posters here it might stand in contrast to the lack of respect she has too often experienced.

 







*dies laughing* Respectful attitude? I'm sorry, that's just funny. This coming from a forum that has more or less systematically driven off most female posters over the last several years.


Sorry, this is a little bit like saying that we should look to mature, responsible role models who exhibit patience, virtue, and wise choices. You know, like Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan.

*

BarnacleBill

  • P Cup
  • 1662
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #106 on: December 10, 2007, 06:34:29 PM »
She is very pretty
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

*

jwatson

  • banned user
  • 794
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #107 on: December 10, 2007, 07:47:34 PM »
DJ can you give us any hints about other girls that we might know that you guys have attempted to contact to pose??  Personally I've been hoping for some more of Rebecca (Becky) Smith who also happens to be of the Brit persuasion.

*

tomjay

  • A Cup
  • 1
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #108 on: December 11, 2007, 09:46:25 AM »
DJPFC You truly have the best job in the world, what a christmas present to all us booblovers, but do you have a set date and theme to when Rachel's first video is going to be released (hopefully no more than a day or two)  

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #109 on: December 11, 2007, 11:02:01 AM »




*dies laughing* Respectful attitude? I'm sorry, that's just funny. This coming from a forum that has more or less systematically driven off most female posters over the last several years.  




That's a staggering distortion of the truth you've posted... to use the word 'most' to describe a mere handful of incidents is either intentionally dishonest or simply ignorant. Of the numerous female posters here over the past decade+ only a relatively tiny handful have left for what seemed to be reasons of dissatisfaction on their part... in fact, I'd be hard pressed to say that the % of female users who did so is any higher than the % of male users who did the same. For either (apparent) gender, there will ALWAYS be some folks who get a negative reaction and leave as a result, be the reason their own actions or the actions of other users (which we do NOT control beyond adherence to the Owner's rules). You might also consider that female users have been booted for habitual rule violations, just like male users.

This is essentially a PUBLIC forum, and anyone visiting it should bear that in mind: just like in the real world, NO ONE controls the reactions they get from others, just as YOU don't control MY reaction to your misinformational post.

If you've got an axe to grind, or some specific problem you want to resolve, that's fine: contact either a moderator or a customer care rep via PM or EM and we'll help you with it as best you can. Otherwise, if you insist on attempting to advance your private agenda via mistruth/revisionist history, be prepared to be called out on it.

*

solo89

  • B Cup
  • 75
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #110 on: December 11, 2007, 04:05:38 PM »
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


Turns Out She's not the biggest in britain!

*

Tina

  • C Cup
  • 80
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #111 on: December 11, 2007, 04:08:38 PM »
Quote:

Palomine said:




*dies laughing* Respectful attitude? I'm sorry, that's just funny. This coming from a forum that has more or less systematically driven off most female posters over the last several years.  




That's a staggering distortion of the truth you've posted... to use the word 'most' to describe a mere handful of incidents is either intentionally dishonest or simply ignorant. Of the numerous female posters here over the past decade+ only a relatively tiny handful have left for what seemed to be reasons of dissatisfaction on their part... in fact, I'd be hard pressed to say that the % of female users who did so is any higher than the % of male users who did the same. For either (apparent) gender, there will ALWAYS be some folks who get a negative reaction and leave as a result, be the reason their own actions or the actions of other users (which we do NOT control beyond adherence to the Owner's rules). You might also consider that female users have been booted for habitual rule violations, just like male users.

This is essentially a PUBLIC forum, and anyone visiting it should bear that in mind: just like in the real world, NO ONE controls the reactions they get from others, just as YOU don't control MY reaction to your misinformational post.

If you've got an axe to grind, or some specific problem you want to resolve, that's fine: contact either a moderator or a customer care rep via PM or EM and we'll help you with it as best you can. Otherwise, if you insist on attempting to advance your private agenda via mistruth/revisionist history, be prepared to be called out on it.





"Advance my private agenda"? Palomine, I wonder if you even bother to read your own posts sometimes, as I think sometimes reality and your perception of it aren't even neighbors. What, praytell, is my private agenda? I'm not a spy, I'm not a businessperson, I'm not a model. I don't HAVE a private agenda.

What I DO have is a long memory. I've been here since this place opened. In fact, I've been here since the days when this was a free site and the Owner was -begging- for donations so people could have Their Very Own Real Server (which he promptly turned into a business and then made everyone pay for access to the majority of the content once they'd already bought his server for him. THAT, I find a hoot and a "private agenda".)

I've seen woman after woman, model after model, leave and stop posting, because of the comments of other users, the actions of other users. So it's far more than a handful of incidents, and to state otherwise is either deceptive, misinformed, or deluded ON YOUR PART.

And no, just as long as we're on the "misinformational" part, you and the other moderators have banned and suspended users for rude behavior, and I can point to specific threads where you've done so. So "we do NOT control beyond adherence to the Owner's rules" is yet another bit of "mistrust/revisionism"...but it's not from me!

Mr. Kettle, there's a call on line one from Mr. Pot.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #112 on: December 11, 2007, 04:33:02 PM »
Quote:

Tina said:
Quote:

Palomine said:




*dies laughing* Respectful attitude? I'm sorry, that's just funny. This coming from a forum that has more or less systematically driven off most female posters over the last several years.  




That's a staggering distortion of the truth you've posted... to use the word 'most' to describe a mere handful of incidents is either intentionally dishonest or simply ignorant. Of the numerous female posters here over the past decade+ only a relatively tiny handful have left for what seemed to be reasons of dissatisfaction on their part... in fact, I'd be hard pressed to say that the % of female users who did so is any higher than the % of male users who did the same. For either (apparent) gender, there will ALWAYS be some folks who get a negative reaction and leave as a result, be the reason their own actions or the actions of other users (which we do NOT control beyond adherence to the Owner's rules). You might also consider that female users have been booted for habitual rule violations, just like male users.

This is essentially a PUBLIC forum, and anyone visiting it should bear that in mind: just like in the real world, NO ONE controls the reactions they get from others, just as YOU don't control MY reaction to your misinformational post.

If you've got an axe to grind, or some specific problem you want to resolve, that's fine: contact either a moderator or a customer care rep via PM or EM and we'll help you with it as best you can. Otherwise, if you insist on attempting to advance your private agenda via mistruth/revisionist history, be prepared to be called out on it.





"Advance my private agenda"? Palomine, I wonder if you even bother to read your own posts sometimes, as I think sometimes reality and your perception of it aren't even neighbors. What, praytell, is my private agenda? I'm not a spy, I'm not a businessperson, I'm not a model. I don't HAVE a private agenda.

What I DO have is a long memory. I've been here since this place opened. In fact, I've been here since the days when this was a free site and the Owner was -begging- for donations so people could have Their Very Own Real Server (which he promptly turned into a business and then made everyone pay for access to the majority of the content once they'd already bought his server for him. THAT, I find a hoot and a "private agenda".)

I've seen woman after woman, model after model, leave and stop posting, because of the comments of other users, the actions of other users. So it's far more than a handful of incidents, and to state otherwise is either deceptive, misinformed, or deluded ON YOUR PART.

And no, just as long as we're on the "misinformational" part, you and the other moderators have banned and suspended users for rude behavior, and I can point to specific threads where you've done so. So "we do NOT control beyond adherence to the Owner's rules" is yet another bit of "mistrust/revisionism"...but it's not from me!

Mr. Kettle, there's a call on line one from Mr. Pot.




Tina, your reply is so full of it on so many levels, it's hard to know where to begin. Briefly:

You needn't be a 'spy, businessperson or model' to have a private agenda... you merely need to be awake. Clearly, you're pissed about all sorts of things related to the BEA and its Owner (one wonders why you don't simply leave if it's all so upsetting to you). Thus, with your feelings so obvious, when you distort facts one can only presume it's because you want to... that you have some personal reason to do so... a 'private agenda.' What it may be, I don't know or care: when you distort, someone will surely point it out lest newbies believe your posts to be factual. Your claims re: memory or time here lend zero credibility to your attempt to portray a relatively tiny % of departed users as 'most' females.

'Rude behavior' can earn consequences: only when users exceed the guidance outlined in the rules will mods step in... users can express negative opinions, provided that they do so in a mature/non-abusive manner. We do NOT censor each and every negative opinion here. This suits the Owner AND the vast majority of users, INCLUDING those that are female and models: you need only skim the BEA Princesses thread to see this is so... there are PRESENTLY a couple dozen female users (some who are models) active right now... some posting daily... some here for months/years. Of course, I'm not counting YOU in that group.

If you want to keep whining about what a lousy place the BEA is for female users, feel free to do so IN the Site Issues forum... provided that you abide by the rules, you won't be censored or penalized for your revisionist critiques (though if you post fabrications, it's likely you'll be rebutted again).

DO NOT continue to post off-topic stuff in THIS General Forum thread.

 

*

Glottis

  • G Cup
  • 1305
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #113 on: December 11, 2007, 04:58:38 PM »
Sometimes this forum makes me think that we should just outlaw opinions on the internet altogether.

*

espy

  • G Cup
  • 2057
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #114 on: December 11, 2007, 05:03:32 PM »
Quote:

Glottis said:
Sometimes this forum makes me think that we should just outlaw opinions on the internet altogether.



That was an opinion!!  


Here's a little reminder of just how fun unrevised reality can be:



Gawd this girl is gorgeous!!
How would a girl with huge boobs ever know if she's truly interesting?

*

G_I_John

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 6884
    • gijohn.deviantart.com/
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #115 on: December 11, 2007, 05:06:16 PM »
Hooray for reality!

*feels its warm fuzzy glow* ^_^
What's better than one woman having really large implants?... a forum full of them ^_^

*

DruulEmpire

  • Freakin' Huge!
  • 12880
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #116 on: December 11, 2007, 05:33:10 PM »
If reality was routinely like Rachel, psychoses in denial of reality would plummet.

*

solo89

  • B Cup
  • 75
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #117 on: December 11, 2007, 05:33:21 PM »
Quote:

Palomine said:
Quote:

Tina said:
Quote:

Palomine said:





 





I Do Believe this is one of the most confusing posts I have ever tried to read...

*

DruulEmpire

  • Freakin' Huge!
  • 12880
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #118 on: December 11, 2007, 05:35:44 PM »
Quote:

solo89 said:
Quote:

Palomine said:
Quote:

Tina said:
Quote:

Palomine said:





 





I Do Believe this is one of the most confusing posts I have ever tried to read...




Well, with any luck, you will no longer have to read it in THIS thread - or section ...

Druul "Sulu, lay in course for the planet Aldana" Empire

*

espy

  • G Cup
  • 2057
Re: Proudly presenting the all-natural, mega-busty Rachel Aldana!
« Reply #119 on: December 11, 2007, 05:55:57 PM »
Quote:

I Do Believe this is one of the most confusing posts I have ever tried to read...



Here's the synopsis:

User:  Blah blah blah bitch blah.
Mod:  Blah blah blah no such blah.
User:  Blah blah blah?  Me?
Mod:  Blah blah blah yeah, you blah.
Rachel:  :: flop :: flop ::
User:  
Mod:  
Everyone else:  
How would a girl with huge boobs ever know if she's truly interesting?