*

MunchWolf

  • What Tagline?
  • 11463
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2003, 12:05:22 AM »
well .. jessica is a common name ...

-Munch "I blame Roger Rabbit" Wolf

*

jayluvsbe

  • E Cup
  • 335
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2003, 05:26:24 PM »
My wife and I love the name Jessica. It was our second choice when our daughter was born. But we chose another because of a missed honeymoon to faraway place.
Jay LuvsBE

You must spank her well, and after you are done with her, you may deal with her as you like... and then... spank me.
And me. And me too. And me.
Yes. Yes, you must give us all a good spanking.

*

xenon

  • G Cup
  • 1372
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2003, 06:00:15 PM »
http://www.breast-implants-augmentations.com/silicone_breast_impants.htm   About the 3rd paragraph down: "History of Breast Implants"
I am not trying to post negativity about injections, but this is one thing I found in research about injections. It of course if taking about past attempts at injections, and with materials that were to be more permanent than saline. Which also, of course, did not go well. Would be great if it someday was as simple as safely injecting some permanent fluid or gas, or even one day a real pill that could achieve extreme permanent breast enlargement, as in 3-10+ cup sizes. That would be really awesome.  
~Xenon

*

Kowalski

  • P Cup
  • 1619
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #18 on: January 16, 2003, 06:43:32 PM »
I saw a thing on the news about 5 years ago, some new method that was being developed by doctores where they implanted some kind of "lattice" or webbing inside the breast, upon which they would grow fat cells. I pictured something like a grape arbor, where the the multiplication of fat cells would be localized or something. This was some legit medical research lab doing this. I don't know if the fat growth was stimulated with drugs, or some other technique. But the goal was to "grow" the breast. Never heard anything more about it.

*

MrHHH

  • L Cup
  • 2986
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2003, 09:25:49 PM »
Yeah. Research is slow. Sigh.

 

*

xenon

  • G Cup
  • 1372
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #20 on: January 18, 2003, 11:14:51 AM »
The polyurethane "String" implants work much like the "lattice" idea you mentioned. They inject a fine string "ball" and then fluids and fat fill the space in and in many cases, a large amount of growth comes from this. Only 1 doctor in TX that I know of had done them this way. My wife is very interested in this method.
~Xenon

*

Chestnuts

  • L Cup
  • 3565
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2003, 12:48:59 AM »
Also recently read something about the same thing done to make lips puffy, botox? whatever it's called, if injected in the breasts would make them puff out for awhile, maybe several weeks before another dose was necessary.  
Avatar by John Coffey, used with permission. Avatar tweaking by Zasha

*

jeddymaster

  • D Cup
  • 163
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #22 on: April 28, 2003, 12:41:37 AM »
hey jay, how did the saline injections into your wife's boobs go?

and...38NN?!  dear god thats nice....
Nothing says love like a monkey!

*

Estradiol

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 10
    • www.uute.de/~estradiol
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2003, 02:29:28 PM »
Hi, you can try hormones to enhance your bust by up to 3 cups. Typical results are 1 to 2 cups within 6 months (depending on your age and genetics).
I have received best results when starting during puberty.

The treatment uses 2 different hormones for females and (optional) 3 hormones if you are male:

- Premarin: This is a hormone which causes tissue growth.
- Provera: This causes lactation and makes your tits look pregnant.

   

*

wendy

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 16
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2003, 02:51:51 AM »
Provera is a progestin and helps to build milk ducts within the breast tissue. Premarin, made from pregnant mare urine (eww yuk), is an estrogen that assists in the movement of fat to female areas of the body. Provera would have the most beneficial affect in causing breast growth especially if the woman has never been pregnant.  

*

RandomX

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 5718
    • www.overflowingforum.com
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #25 on: November 23, 2003, 07:33:58 PM »
Holy crap! Its my first post EVER! My delurking post! *sniffles*

Oh the memories...
100% real woman, with notarized documents and witnesses to back this claim up.

*

rtpoe

  • Old Fart
  • 12418
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #26 on: November 24, 2003, 09:14:39 PM »
Oh, the mammaries.....

rtpoe
(ducking the tomato....bangs head on furniture....OW!)
rtpoe

The ground is deep with fallen leaves and nuts of White and Red Oak, and of Beech, that line and fill the footprints and the ruts which all along the wooded pathway reach. First claim, of course, to chipmunk and to squirrel for bleak mid-Winter sustenance belongs, as all around old leaves descend and twirl about, through feathered autumn songs.
"Oakwise", Nut Gathering at Alban Eve

*

RandomX

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 5718
    • www.overflowingforum.com
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #27 on: November 24, 2003, 09:22:29 PM »
Yes! Just look! From post one to a tomatoed reign of terror! MWAHAHHAHAA!

*goes into a tomato flinging frenzy*
100% real woman, with notarized documents and witnesses to back this claim up.

*

rtpoe

  • Old Fart
  • 12418
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #28 on: November 24, 2003, 09:33:34 PM »
Good thing I fell under my desk....

rtpoe
rtpoe

The ground is deep with fallen leaves and nuts of White and Red Oak, and of Beech, that line and fill the footprints and the ruts which all along the wooded pathway reach. First claim, of course, to chipmunk and to squirrel for bleak mid-Winter sustenance belongs, as all around old leaves descend and twirl about, through feathered autumn songs.
"Oakwise", Nut Gathering at Alban Eve

*

NotElvis

  • F Cup
  • 512
Re: Any non-implant methods?
« Reply #29 on: January 24, 2004, 10:22:18 PM »
Presumably both Provera and Premarin would cause some sort of effect on fertility, or otherwise "not play well" with birth control pills, I assume.  But am I assuming correctly?

Quote:

 Premarin, made from pregnant mare urine (eww yuk), is an estrogen that assists in the movement of fat to female areas of the body.




Um, a question.  Wouldn't Premarin only serve to increase fat to areas a woman is already predisposed?  That is, if she's predisposed toward big breasts, this will increase it, but if she's predisposed toward small breasts and gaining weight in the bottom, wouldn't it merely increase that rather than causing breast growth?

Quote:

 Provera is a progestin and helps to build milk ducts within the breast tissue.  Provera would have the most beneficial affect in causing breast growth especially if the woman has never been pregnant.  




Are Provera and Premarin brand names?  What's the actual name of the hormones in question?

My apologies for resurrecting a long-dead thread.