In other news, we are seeing why people might turn out to vote for Trump again in 2020 due to the stupidity and attempt to insult the audience's intelligence with another manipulative fake news story by the mainstream media.
Donald Trump calls MS-13 "animals" and the democratic platform and the mainstream media quickly dig their own grave by doing the unthinkable; defend MS-13.
House Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi!!!! herself went on a tirade defending MS-13 and trying to come across as a holier than thou person who cares about human life.
CBS, AP, New York Times, CNN, NBC, Washington Post, etc, all run stories with headlines suggesting Trump called illegal immigrants animals and they leave out the part that he was talking about MS-13. (But.... but.... but.... they made corrections!)
The village idiots all believe it and think this is another reason why Trump is a racist because he just called ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS "ANIMALS."
Hmmm, how do I respond to this while completely ignoring what the mainstream media did? How do I respond to this without acknowledging that it was indeed an attempt to manipulate people by my favorite media outlets that I love and how do I find a way to still insult half a country and sound very smart at the same time? *snaps fingers* Ha! I've got it!:
Smart people know he is a racist, no matter about who he talks and did talk in the past. He despise everyone who is not pro him. Only the dumbest of the dumbest people on earth that are also happen to be his butt hole enhancer- voters "believe different", I can't  say "think different", they miss IQ to be able thinking.
Sounds like you despise smart people that bring money to a country and make it successful.
I for myself decided some time ago based on my experience that the error rate or fake news rate or propaganda rate or illiterate of democracy established classical media is at a magnitude (while not sure of it, I hope you know what a magnitude is!) of 1 or 2 more reliable than far right wing extremist terrorist Nazi news sources, or their blogs or any articles from them. Best example is their leader Trumpelstilsken, he only insults, spreads BS without data backing up, invents fake news, he is full with shit of idiology ...
I want to discuss their behaviour. Their attempt is to insult 100 % of the people to sell them idiocy, why should I be concerned calling 25,5% of the people idiots and the dumbest people on earth when they actually are. They are not normal! I asumed you didn't voted for Trumpelstilsken, so you shouldn't be affected by me calling idiots idiots and Nazis Nazis. RIGHT?
Best example of Trumpelstilsken goon and butt hole enhancing idiot voter: Roseanne Barr.
P.s.: and in fact that you say I am insulting 50% is once again fake news. It is far less. Trumpelstilsken lost the popular vote with 46,4%. Your fake news debunk no. 1. Then  46,9% didn't  even go voting, so 25,5 % are the dumbest of the dumbest on earth. Again you better stay with facts rather than your Trumpelstilken-like fantasy facts. It is really difficult to take you serious and try a discussion. Maybe some more political correctness by you is required that you get discussion partners that can take you serious.
It is the same why I can't take discussion serious coming from the right in Germany. Even for me as someone in the political middle of the democratic society these discussions are so far away from the daily experienced facts that I could take them serious.