The small breasts thread(s) NOW MERGED

Palomine · « **Reply #210 on:** December 28, 2009, 09:10:49 PM »

This vintage cutie looks an awful lot like the second girl I ever **84** with, at least below the neck.

gOOber · « **Reply #211 on:** December 29, 2009, 01:54:56 AM »

Yeah, she`s a bit curvy...........

Hiram · « **Reply #212 on:** December 29, 2009, 04:25:42 AM »

I call foul. That girl's about the same size as Lucy Pinder. Not small by any standards.

I don't think she's that big to be honest.

HandyRefuse · « **Reply #213 on:** December 29, 2009, 04:22:18 PM »

may be a little on the small side up top, but the rest of her ... dayum

Goldeneye · « **Reply #214 on:** December 30, 2009, 11:37:33 AM »

This vintage cutie looks an awful lot like the second girl I ever **84** with, at least below the neck.

Damn. She's built like a comic book character. And I'd wager that her ass is EPIC.

gOOber · « **Reply #215 on:** December 30, 2009, 02:34:37 PM »

gOOber · « **Reply #216 on:** January 01, 2010, 03:36:39 PM »

gOOber · « **Reply #217 on:** January 04, 2010, 06:07:48 AM »

gOOber · « **Reply #218 on:** January 05, 2010, 07:32:30 AM »

pedonbio · « **Reply #219 on:** January 05, 2010, 05:05:59 PM »

I call foul. That girl's about the same size as Lucy Pinder. Not small by any standards.

I think we can forgive him for allowing upcreep...

gOOber · « **Reply #220 on:** January 06, 2010, 07:57:07 AM »

Palomine · « **Reply #221 on:** January 06, 2010, 04:12:20 PM »

No idea who she is, but a woman this tasty appeals in ANY era.

gOOber · « **Reply #222 on:** January 07, 2010, 10:16:45 AM »

Palomine · « **Reply #223 on:** January 08, 2010, 01:09:41 PM »

More modest retro goodness. Relatively modest. More vintage than retro actually. But you get my drift.

Sorry, no name.

gOOber · « **Reply #224 on:** January 08, 2010, 01:15:29 PM »