*

luvdemwhoppers

  • T Cup
  • 8196
  • Don Pauleboy
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #285 on: September 04, 2011, 04:32:27 PM »
.
I'm walkin' here

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #286 on: September 04, 2011, 05:16:01 PM »
'crinkly' texture =priceless

There is good and bad in every era of porn. In the 1970s editors would routinely reject pictures with "crinkly" nips because it could also indicate "recent sexual activity" by the model. In a lot of states that was considered obscene.
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #287 on: September 08, 2011, 05:39:39 PM »
Don't know who this (amateur?) model is, and the quizzical expression on her face is quite appropriate...I look at her boobs and wonder why the borders of her areolae look the way they do.
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #288 on: September 08, 2011, 07:01:45 PM »
Don't know who this (amateur?) model is, and the quizzical expression on her face is quite appropriate...I look at her boobs and wonder why the borders of her areolae look the way they do.

She's delicious... VERY delicious. The white fringe around the edges of the areolas almost look like the scars left (for some skin types) after a breast reduction surgery where the nipple has been relocated. However, without seeing the underside of her breasts (for the other tell-tale reduction scars) there's no way to know for sure.

Extra delicious regardless. Thanks! :)

*

Hoogleboogle

  • E Cup
  • 419
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #289 on: September 09, 2011, 04:08:28 PM »
Here's a porn star named Havana Ginger, who deserves a place in this thread for obvious reasons.
Boobs!

*

luvdemwhoppers

  • T Cup
  • 8196
  • Don Pauleboy
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #290 on: September 11, 2011, 06:21:56 PM »
found this in National Geographic, they sed it was the Grand Tetons. ok. (Lorna btw)
« Last Edit: September 11, 2011, 06:23:33 PM by luvdemwhoppers »
I'm walkin' here

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83850
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #291 on: September 12, 2011, 01:15:48 PM »
National Geographic ? Well then, you know it ain't porno.  ;) ;D

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #292 on: September 13, 2011, 05:08:13 PM »
Reminds me a bit of Danni Ashe, but I have no idea who she is. Awful impressive though.


*

luvdemwhoppers

  • T Cup
  • 8196
  • Don Pauleboy
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #293 on: September 13, 2011, 05:28:37 PM »
^thanks, I have to wash my shorts now.
I'm walkin' here

*

chorizo

  • B Cup
  • 1502
Re: biggest areolas
« Reply #294 on: September 13, 2011, 08:43:26 PM »
adorable areolas.

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83850
Re: biggest areolas
« Reply #295 on: September 14, 2011, 01:03:42 AM »
adorable areolas.



Talk about reviving the dead. This thread is 8 1/2 years buried !  :o They are adorable though.  :)

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: biggest areolas
« Reply #296 on: September 14, 2011, 01:05:22 AM »


Talk about reviving the dead. This thread is 8 1/2 years buried !  :o They are adorable though.  :)

...and there is a similar thread in the Off Topic forum.

Mod edit: good point... I'll merge it with the OTF thread (we'll keep it there instead of the GF so folks have the option of posting areola pix even if the gal isn't particularly chesty). Thanks. :) -Pal
« Last Edit: September 14, 2011, 09:59:17 AM by Palomine »
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

T_Man

  • F Cup
  • 3353
Re: Areolas redux MERGED
« Reply #297 on: September 14, 2011, 04:08:04 PM »
Mmmmmm, crinkly....
"What I lack in talent I make up for with enthusiasm"

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux MERGED
« Reply #298 on: September 15, 2011, 11:38:22 AM »
No idea who this is either... though of course, she's vaguely familiar. Strikes me as more of a professional model/pictorial, though I think it was found in an 'amateurs' group (pro images get mixed in there all the time, plus there's a big grey area between pro and amateur of course). With a body like that, she'd have to have a face like Secretariat to be a no-go, and really, what are the odds of that? ;)


*

T_Man

  • F Cup
  • 3353
Re: Areolas redux MERGED
« Reply #299 on: September 16, 2011, 11:20:46 AM »
I think this beautiful woman has spectacular aereolae.
"What I lack in talent I make up for with enthusiasm"