[Palomine]

The second photo of "Felicia" that I've posted (only have four )... I think the other was in GF 'Hangers' perhaps. This retro brunette is amply qualified for any number of threads focusing on specific anatomical goodies.

[Palomine]

This is (quite sadly) the only image I have of this model... I know nothing about her other than the obvious, which is that she's quite simply awesome.

[Goldeneye]

Dayum!

[Palomine]

OK, I was well under 10 years of age when I first laid eyes on the issue of Penthouse that contained Francis Cannon and her Nov. 1973 Pet of the Month layout. Along with Avril Lund (also from Penthouse) and a half dozen well-endowed (and better known) Playboy centerfolds from that era, the lovely Ms. Cannon had quite an effect on my preferences. Whether she (and ladies like her) helped me develop my predilection for voluptuous figures or whether she simply demonstrated/confirmed what I somehow already was drawn to, I do not know.

Though she'd probably not get hired by Score, she's pretty ample by Penthouse standards of the day and I am sure that back then, in my formative years, I was just as pleased by her cute face, girlish hair-do and broad areolas as I am today.

[Palomine]

OK, before folks start ragging on Gwen, let me point out that not every model has to (or even should for that matter) look like a Vogue covergirl. Sure, facially she's a bit wide and bottom heavy, but despite this (heck, I'd argue BECAUSE of it) she's delightful and appealing. And then there's the matter of her 'rockin' bod' (to borrow a South Parkian term) and large pale areolas.

[Goldeneye]

Wide? Bottom-heavy? Not a cover girl? Okay, I don't see *any* of those things. All I see the rockin.

[TheZookie007]

Wide? Bottom-heavy? Not a cover girl? Okay, I don't see *any* of those things. All I see the rockin.

What he said! Delightful, appealing, I'd do her any time she'd want me to!

[Palomine]

Only two pix of her and she's equally irresistible in both of them. Would like to know/see more about her.

[Goldeneye]

Oh man. Those are all-day suckers right there. Those kinda "Open your mouth as wide as you can and suck as hard as possible to see if you can get the whole damn thing in your mouth."

[Palomine]

The fantastic shape of her breasts has always made me smile.

[Palomine]

I have a sneaking suspicion that I've seen pix of this amateur here before... I may have even posted one myself under another name (filename, not my name). I have only a couple of her (that I know of) and I call her "Kana" even though that's probably not her name. Cute as a button, with tanlines capable of making a 70's Playmate green with envy, her most notable feature is, of course, nipples and areolas that'd be an expected sight on a woman several times her mass. It goes without saying that if anyone knows more about her, or has more pix of her, I'd surely like to know it.

Hooray for disproportion!

[TheZookie007]

I don't know anything about her, sadly, but I agree with you on all counts. Hurray for disproportion!

[Palomine]

While hardly the one-in-a-million areolas of "Kana" below, this would seem to be Kira Eggers a Danish stripper. No idea if she's a natural redhead (I hope so ) but she's got a cute, sharp-featured face (love those bangs) and of course, a fairly impressive set of areolas. Very nice presentation overall.

[Palomine]

Shockingly, I never heard of Laura McGuinness before stumbling across this pic in an unsorted folder. Not even sure if the spelling of her name is right in the filename. Regardless, she appears to be basically awesome, and blessed with fantastic large areolas thus worthy of sharing here.

[r2d2]

Charmaine Sinclair ...