[Palomine]

I hear you Gonzo... but consider this:  Here's a woman who displays her wares for money.  Does that not make her a public figure and thereby open to criticism?  If a public figure makes claims (i.e., she's natural, etc.) then isn't she fair game for retort?

Finally, she might not be here to refute my claims, but who's stopping her?  Her absence is supposed to make her immune to criticism?  Does that make sense to you?

My colleague gonZo has been far more patient with you than you deserve. Since you've got a well-documented history of this sort of behavior (insulting models then whining about your free speech rights being infringed once your User Agreement violations get moderated) and you *continue* to ignore warnings NOT to do this, I'm letting you know now: more of this from you and you'll find yourself banned.

Don't waste our time or anyone else's with faux polemics about your Constitutional rights... this is a private club and you signed a contract obligating you to specific behaviors in order to participate here. You've used up your allotment of warnings and all of our patience so either cut this nonsense out or find some other forum in which to insult women you've never met.
 
 

[DJPFC]

My colleague gonZo has been far more patient with you than you deserve. Since you've got a well-documented history of this sort of behavior (insulting models then whining about your free speech rights being infringed once your User Agreement violations get moderated) and you *continue* to ignore warnings NOT to do this, I'm letting you know now: more of this from you and you'll find yourself banned.

Don't waste our time or anyone else's with faux polemics about your Constitutional rights... this is a private club and you signed a contract obligating you to specific behaviors in order to participate here. You've used up your allotment of warnings and all of our patience so either cut this nonsense out or find some other forum in which to insult women you've never met.
 
 

Exactly.  This isn't a democracy and there's no "free speech" here.  This is a privately owned forum board and the person who owns that forum makes the rules that we all agree to abide by if we are to participate here.  If you can't agree to those rules or obey them, the Owner and his Moderators have the right to censure you for it.  It's the same principle as going over to someone's house as a guest -- you abide by their rules and if you start insulting them or the other guests or behaving like a jerk, they kick you out.

If you want freedom of speech, you have every right to go start your own forum and make your own rules for it.

[Siria]

I'm sorry RX, but being a lawyer knocks her down the chart quite a bit for greatest person, for me at least.  

Objection! Sorry, I had to say it.

Anyway, I seriously doubt those are real, especially after the lying-on-her-back photo. Natural boobs rarely stick up like that. I'd be willing to believe she's a lawyer and bisexual, though, if only because I've seen no evidence to the contrary. Being openly bisexual doesn't really limit your career opportunities these days.

The point that the world of attorneys is cutthroat doesn't hold water; not all attorneys are selfish or evil, and not all even work on the sorts of cases that are morally ambiguous. Also, there's nothing stopping a woman with large breasts from becoming a lawyer. Social stigma may make it harder for a large-breasted woman to get a job at a major law firm, but "What cup size are you?" isn't a question on any bar exam.

I'm not an expert on these things, but I'm pretty sure any licensed attorney could get a job with the ACLU or other non-profit organizations without too much difficulty.

[threetenors2]

My colleague gonZo has been far more patient with you than you deserve. Since you've got a well-documented history of this sort of behavior (insulting models then whining about your free speech rights being infringed once your User Agreement violations get moderated) and you *continue* to ignore warnings NOT to do this, I'm letting you know now: more of this from you and you'll find yourself banned.

Don't waste our time or anyone else's with faux polemics about your Constitutional rights... this is a private club and you signed a contract obligating you to specific behaviors in order to participate here. You've used up your allotment of warnings and all of our patience so either cut this nonsense out or find some other forum in which to insult women you've never met.
 
 

Palamine - you're quite the angry son-of-a-bitch, aren't you?  You think that since you control the on-off switch to this site that I should tremble at your very words?  You are truly a pathetlic little man.  Have you considered the possibility, you arrogant little girly-boy, that I'm actually RIGHT about this model?  Have you considered the possibility, you estrogen-laden doughboy, that I HAVE actually met her?

[AgentDee]

well I don't think your gonna last here much longer if you insult one of the mods like that.

[CarlTL]

Some people just like to watch the world burn...

[threetenors2]

well I don't think your gonna last here much longer if you insult one of the mods like that.

Why?  Does it make him feel good to ban me?

[AgentDee]

the mods hate to ban ANYBODY, but if people act like name calling ass hats then they have no choice.

[threetenors2]

the mods hate to ban ANYBODY, but if people act like name calling ass hats then they have no choice.

1.  Look at the recent discourse between me and Gonzo.  We disagreed, but did so with civility. 
2.  Look at Palamine's recent entry, which is caustic, threatening and unincited.  I hadn't again "insulted" the model but was, instead, defending my opinion with Gonzo who, I think, is acting appropriately.  Palamine inserts himself back into the conversation with the same finesse that a bull romps through a china-shop.

Palamine thinks that Gonzo is being too patient with me?  Who the f&%^ asked for his opinion?

[Siria]

Palamine thinks that Gonzo is being too patient with me?  Who the f&%^ asked for his opinion?

A moderator's role on an Internet forum is to call out people who break the rules and, sometimes, discipline offenders. So, if you want to know who asked for his opinion, it is implied that the owner of the site asked for his opinion by conferring him a role where his opinion is relevant by definition.

[spathicblond]

Any chance of this thread not being about a guy who's about to be banned (not because moderators would feel good, but because the rest of us will feel better not having them) and more about the awesome model who's online name is the subject title of this thread? Please?

[threetenors2]

Any chance of this thread not being about a guy who's about to be banned (not because moderators would feel good, but because the rest of us will feel better not having them) and more about the awesome model who's online name is the subject title of this thread? Please?

* LMFAO * My God!  I WAS offering more about this model!  I guess I just should have spouted brain-dead accolades.  Right?

[threetenors2]

A moderator's role on an Internet forum is to call out people who break the rules and, sometimes, discipline offenders. So, if you want to know who asked for his opinion, it is implied that the owner of the site asked for his opinion by conferring him a role where his opinion is relevant by definition.

 Um... does it matter that I was being "called out" even though I was NO LONGER "breaking the rules", Sharia?

[spathicblond]

* LMFAO * My God!  I WAS offering more about this model!  I guess I just should have spouted brain-dead accolades.  Right?

Yes, that's right, lets instead complain about the pretty girl showing us her breasts! How horrible! 'cause That's not brain-dead at all.

[threetenors2]

Yes, that's right, lets instead complain about the pretty girl showing us her breasts! How horrible! 'cause That's not brain-dead at all.

Dude, if you want to filter out the background noise, just do it.  If you want to be part of the noise, then just jump in... like you've already done.