[threetenors2]

What a babe.

Just remember that, for the right amount of money, your girlfriend could have those too.

[Ghost_Man]

Just remember that, for the right amount of money, your girlfriend could have those too.

Yeah, but what if she ditches me after I hooked her up with all those goodies?

[Ooze3d]

I supose it's better not to invite her... It's happened before and will happen again. A few members will flood the thread with photo and video requests telling her she's the best model ever. Things will be great for a few days and then one single pun intended post will screw up everything. Probably something about her boobs not being natural. She'll stop posting for a few days and will probably return just to say "bye". After that the thread will add a few pages with equally negative and positive comments and lots of members begging her to come back.

Sounds familiar?

[BillN]

You guys left off the Troll that usually ends up getting banned for running the model off with their bullshit.   

[RandomX]

Damn threetenors. Can you be ANY more of a debbie downer?

[Glottis]

Seriously. He might be right, but every one of his posts is in this thread, bashing this person (who has no ability to defend herself) with information that we can't possibly confirm.

[threetenors2]

Damn threetenors. Can you be ANY more of a debbie downer?

what did I do?

[Ghost_Man]

 

[threetenors2]

Beautiful.  Far from the natural she claims to be.

[gonZo]

threetenors2, the way you've been trashing Bedazzled5 in this thread is unacceptable, and is prohibited by the Forum Rules. These critical and disrespectful posts won't be allowed to continue.

[threetenors2]

threetenors2, the way you've been trashing Bedazzled5 in this thread is unacceptable, and is prohibited by the Forum Rules. These critical and disrespectful posts won't be allowed to continue.

Absolutely!  Last thing we want here is an honest discourse.  Just happy faces and accolades!

[Ooze3d]

Not really... But you can't just pop in here saying "I know this woman... she's a looser" knowing that she's not here to defend herself.

[gonZo]

Absolutely!  Last thing we want here is an honest discourse.  Just happy faces and accolades!

We have no problems with honest discourse. We also have no assurances that anything you've written about Bedazzled5 is objectively true.

When you registered here, you agreed not to reveal private information about others (but you did), and not to import controversy from other venues (but you did). You've called Bedazzled5 a fake, a liar, a loser, pathetic, etc., and you've done it from a safe distance so that she has no opportunity to defend herself or offer her opinions of you.

If you have a dispute with her, take it to her. You're a guest of the owner of this forum, and he doesn't want your quarrel here.

[threetenors2]

We have no problems with honest discourse. We also have no assurances that anything you've written about Bedazzled5 is objectively true.

I hear you Gonzo... but consider this:  Here's a woman who displays her wares for money.  Does that not make her a public figure and thereby open to criticism?  If a public figure makes claims (i.e., she's natural, etc.) then isn't she fair game for retort?

Finally, she might not be here to refute my claims, but who's stopping her?  Her absence is supposed to make her immune to criticism?  Does that make sense to you?

[gonZo]

I hear you Gonzo... but consider this:  Here's a woman who displays her wares for money.  Does that not make her a public figure and thereby open to criticism?  If a public figure makes claims (i.e., she's natural, etc.) then isn't she fair game for retort?

Finally, she might not be here to refute my claims, but who's stopping her?  Her absence is supposed to make her immune to criticism?  Does that make sense to you?

Moderation in this forum isn't intended to inhibit your free speech; it's intended to protect BEArchive from legal liability. When you post defamatory, potentially false, or otherwise actionable statements about another person --public figure or otherwise-- you expose the forum to liability, and you violate the BEA's owner's rules for guests of the forum.

Her absence doesn't immunize her to criticism, but the promise to respect people's privacy and dignity that you made when you joined this forum should have prevented you from posting those statements about her.

We've censored and warned you each time you've been disrespectful to a model because we want you to stop doing that. The BEA's owner expects his guests to behave with civility, and when you knowingly violate the terms of your user-agreement, you're nullifying any obligation we have to allow you to access the site.