[solvegas]

From the BEA User Gallery, AI by Nostromo.

[Bombayduk]

Many AI images have gotten so good that it is impossible to tell them from real without a program to dissect the photo, which leads me to question a rule here.  I remember being called to the carpet once for posting a picture on a thread, then someone (not a moderator) declared the picture AI and said the rules state AI pictures can only be posted on designated AI threads.  To this day, I have no idea if the picture was AI, but I deleted the post. 

If this is a actual rule, how can anyone contribute a picture to a thread without knowing the identity of the girl in the picture?  Or as I was called out (same individual) for posting a picture that may likely altered on another thread.  I left the picture up because I thought the BEA supported altered pictures. 

But in a age where AI is so good that it is easily mistaken for reality, I find it bizarre that there is yet another BEA rule that requires anyone posting to find the identity of the subject before posting to be sure it is not AI.  It has certainly dampened my enthusiasm to search other sites for images that pertain to the subject matter of any thread and thus add to participation here.  And we wonder why fewer people post today; I have thoughts on the matter.

[solvegas]

^ You can add to AI as long as you give credit to whoever did it. Or you can start, like Punchy, your own AI thread. 

[3deroticer]

I'll be frank, I am a bit nervous of doing Ai of famous peeps, there are ton of famous peep porn, and the far right administration project 2025 wants to ban all porn eventually, or what was written in project 2025 that supposedly didn't exist? More than 50% of the project have already have become in fruition. So there is that. Then you have the parody immunity of doing these. So I don't know what the future will be like? However, the Republican have voted against regulating any Ai publish works. Spotify have made a new contract for musician that any works publish on spotify are now properties of spotify, and have rights to make derivatives of their works.

So I am open to suggestion, as you know if the Ai I make is a parody of the real model I post them to that model section, but if the Ai stuff I do isn't up to my standards of being identify with anyone, I post them in Ai generated section. It may be easier to post them all in the Ai generated section. But posting them in dead post make them come back again.

[Bombayduk]

I'll be frank, I am a bit nervous of doing Ai of famous peeps, there are ton of famous peep porn, and the far right administration project 2025 wants to ban all porn eventually, or what was written in project 2025 that supposedly didn't exist? More than 50% of the project have already have become in fruition. So there is that. Then you have the parody immunity of doing these. So I don't know what the future will be like? However, the Republican have voted against regulating any Ai publish works. Spotify have made a new contract for musician that any works publish on spotify are now properties of spotify, and have rights to make derivatives of their works.

So I am open to suggestion, as you know if the Ai I make is a parody of the real model I post them to that model section, but if the Ai stuff I do isn't up to my standards of being identify with anyone, I post them in Ai generated section. It may be easier to post them all in the Ai generated section. But posting them in dead post make them come back again.

While that certainly isn't the direction I was going, I'm not opposed to putting some things behind an age requirement wall, however, "porn" is in the eye of the beholder, so it becomes a rather absurd position to ban something that could be perceived differently by a dozen different people.  To that end, though I follow news rather well, I have not seen any move by any party to ban porn.

[vf1000ride]

To be in this position. 

[3deroticer]

While that certainly isn't the direction I was going, I'm not opposed to putting some things behind an age requirement wall, however, "porn" is in the eye of the beholder, so it becomes a rather absurd position to ban something that could be perceived differently by a dozen different people.  To that end, though I follow news rather well, I have not seen any move by any party to ban porn.
[/quote]
I haven't seen it yet, but only that it's in the project 2025

I think we haven't seen it yet, because they know they wouldn't be able to enforce it yet! But look at Florida and how they went after porn stars living in their state! SaRenna Lee moved out before they went after her, after she saw how her friends in the bizz were treated. For making video content for their own website, they were being tried for **31** ring.

[Bombayduk]

I live in Florida and the only thing they have gone after is banning exposure of kids in grade to trans shows and/or books of a sexual nature, something over 80% of the populace supports.  They also supposedly have a age requirement for porn sites, but I don't think it has been enforced.  To my knowledge, there has been no legislation regarding porn beyond where it is not allowed to be shown, like to 6 year old kids.  There are still topless bars around for girls like SaRenna Lee, though I don't think they are as popular as they once were.  Only one left in my county that once had three; guess they are more a big city thing now.  Like Vegas, it's been about a dozen years since I was last there, but topless bars were certainly in decline from 1990.  I didn't realize Ms Lee was doing porn or that she lived in Florida; she must be at least 60, I would think.

[3deroticer]

She partner up with Casey James on SarCasProduction LLC, producing content of other porn star wanna be, But Florida Governor crack down on porn star living in Florida, when she saw her friend fighting in court defending herself with trump up charges of running a porn for hire ring, She decided it was time to leave the state for her safety. This whole country is getting religious into govt. Main reason why topless bar is in decline. Even in Oregon, you will see a cop car park in front of the establishment. That's how they were able to shut down these bars thru intimidation and harassment. Even all the bikini coffee shop were shut down. It's not that they weren't popular anymore. They were sabotage with higher cost of running the business and liquor license denial with limitation of the club floor regulation. They kept clipping the wings bit by bit until the bird is gone.

However, Ai is here to stay, and I think in some way it could help make it harder for the real porn star to compete with Ai model. I mean already they have site for a guy to have a Ai girlfriend, which may help the lonely guy epidemic that is going on now! LOL

[Bombayduk]

I'm just glad that Florida has banned drag shows and sexual material from our kindergartens; 6 year old kids don't need to have someone's junk shoved in their faces.  It may be permitted elsewhere, but parents here don't want innocent minds corrupted.

While it is just my opinion, but I see the decline of topless as the resulting cost of doing business.  Increased overhead increases prices, along with the combination of venue limiting customers; it is a very niche market.  And unfortunately, it often resides in seedy areas, which further limits customers.  There is a reason why the Spearmint Rhino is not on the strip and the last time I was there, the dancers outnumbered the customers, a enormous decline from the packed house of the 90s.  Girls can make more money online than they can on laps today.

The movie industry has long had the ability to blend AI characters nearly seamlessly into movies, so I imagine it would be fairly easy to take that step into the porn industry when it becomes financially feasible to replace the wages spent on porn stars.  And the results may be in line with the things punchy creates, things that do not exist in real life.  It certainly stirs the imagination.

[solvegas]

^ Much of the decline of Gentlemen's clubs is due to the Internet since you can see naked women online all the time. Before I had computers, I used to go often to porn stores and stripper bars since it was the way to see stuff at the time. Times have changed. 

[Bombayduk]

^ Much of the decline of Gentlemen's clubs is due to the Internet since you can see naked women online all the time. Before I had computers, I used to go often to porn stores and stripper bars since it was the way to see stuff at the time. Times have changed. 

I agree.  In Florida, it wasn't so much law enforcement nor public opinion as it was just a decline in customers.  Though opinions on what constitutes "porn" are a dime a dozen, I never considered topless bars as porn and I'm not really entertained by those online sites; I've seen them but they do not warrant my attention.  IMHO, stuff that stretches the imagination, like what punchy and others produce, that combine fantasy and reality are more entertaining.  But that is just my opinion,

[vf1000ride]

She wants your attention.

[solvegas]

She wants your attention.

If she was real, she could be in several threads like the big bras, veiny breasts, freckles and huge hangers. 

[3deroticer]

I love this one! Juicy butt and breast