[Margaret]

Thanks for the estimates on my latest posts - I have a new candidate.  I think she is natural, but to honest I'm not sure with this lady.

She looks very petite, with a super-slim back - so this one is relatively easy (I think). Possibly a 28H or 28HH - although, she could be even smaller build - so it wouldn’t be unusual for her to be something like a 26HH.

[Hiram]

Here we have a fan fav Linsey Dawn McKenzie - and some perspective.

[Margaret]

Here we have a fan fav Linsey Dawn McKenzie - and some perspective.

This is an interesting one, because I know of this woman. I can remember a lot about her in the UK newspapers in the mid-90s. They promoted her as 36HH at the time - which was probably the size she was given using the +4 technique at Marks and Spencer. A 36HH sounds big, and I suppose it is in relative terms, but she’s not a 36HH (and, as I understand it, she had a reduction and then went back and got implants), so things will be different now.

In this photo, she’s about 5’2”, based on the tape measurement and fairly broad shouldered - but still slim (I am super-jealous of jus how slim!). So, I’m thinking she’s in the 30-32 back region, with a J-K cup. I’m thinking 32J/JJ - she has very similar projection and bodyshape to someone I know, and she’s a slightly bigger 32K, so I reckon 32JJ is probably about right (depending on the bra).

[solvegas]

Here we have a fan fav Linsey Dawn McKenzie - and some perspective.

This is an interesting one, because I know of this woman. I can remember a lot about her in the UK newspapers in the mid-90s. They promoted her as 36HH at the time - which was probably the size she was given using the +4 technique at Marks and Spencer. A 36HH sounds big, and I suppose it is in relative terms, but she’s not a 36HH (and, as I understand it, she had a reduction and then went back and got implants), so things will be different now.

In this photo, she’s about 5’2”, based on the tape measurement and fairly broad shouldered - but still slim (I am super-jealous of jus how slim!). So, I’m thinking she’s in the 30-32 back region, with a J-K cup. I’m thinking 32J/JJ - she has very similar projection and bodyshape to someone I know, and she’s a slightly bigger 32K, so I reckon 32JJ is probably about right (depending on the bra).

She's 5'3" tall, so that was a good approximation just by looking at that leg measurement. 

[Margaret]

Here we have a fan fav Linsey Dawn McKenzie - and some perspective.

This is an interesting one, because I know of this woman. I can remember a lot about her in the UK newspapers in the mid-90s. They promoted her as 36HH at the time - which was probably the size she was given using the +4 technique at Marks and Spencer. A 36HH sounds big, and I suppose it is in relative terms, but she’s not a 36HH (and, as I understand it, she had a reduction and then went back and got implants), so things will be different now.

In this photo, she’s about 5’2”, based on the tape measurement and fairly broad shouldered - but still slim (I am super-jealous of jus how slim!). So, I’m thinking she’s in the 30-32 back region, with a J-K cup. I’m thinking 32J/JJ - she has very similar projection and bodyshape to someone I know, and she’s a slightly bigger 32K, so I reckon 32JJ is probably about right (depending on the bra).

She's 5'3" tall, so that was a good approximation just by looking at that leg measurement. 

It’s weird isn’t it? I’m 5’4” - and, in my mind, she seems way taller than I am - but it’s down to a lot of factors (not least of which is how they tend to photograph models; from slightly lower angles to make them seem tall and statuesque): she wears heels a lot, and is often standing with models of a similar or smaller height. She has mega-long thigh bones - which I have too (top secret hint for dating women with long thigh bones: doggie-style sex is often uncomfortable!) - and, models always arch their backs to project out their chest, and also tighten their calves to add another inch. But it was easy enough to figure out a rough height with the measuring tape there in the photo. Her bra size is a little more tricky - but if she was standing in front of me, my first guess would be 32JJ - but I’d have to try her with a few different bras/brands to be sure. She looks low set, slightly west-east, so a full cup or a balconette would work well (or, *would* have worked well - I don’t know what would work now). 

[solvegas]

Here we have a fan fav Linsey Dawn McKenzie - and some perspective.

This is an interesting one, because I know of this woman. I can remember a lot about her in the UK newspapers in the mid-90s. They promoted her as 36HH at the time - which was probably the size she was given using the +4 technique at Marks and Spencer. A 36HH sounds big, and I suppose it is in relative terms, but she’s not a 36HH (and, as I understand it, she had a reduction and then went back and got implants), so things will be different now.

In this photo, she’s about 5’2”, based on the tape measurement and fairly broad shouldered - but still slim (I am super-jealous of jus how slim!). So, I’m thinking she’s in the 30-32 back region, with a J-K cup. I’m thinking 32J/JJ - she has very similar projection and bodyshape to someone I know, and she’s a slightly bigger 32K, so I reckon 32JJ is probably about right (depending on the bra).

She's 5'3" tall, so that was a good approximation just by looking at that leg measurement. 

It’s weird isn’t it? I’m 5’4” - and, in my mind, she seems way taller than I am - but it’s down to a lot of factors (not least of which is how they tend to photograph models; from slightly lower angles to make them seem tall and statuesque): she wears heels a lot, and is often standing with models of a similar or smaller height. She has mega-long thigh bones - which I have too (top secret hint for dating women with long thigh bones: doggie-style sex is often uncomfortable!) - and, models always arch their backs to project out their chest, and also tighten their calves to add another inch. But it was easy enough to figure out a rough height with the measuring tape there in the photo. Her bra size is a little more tricky - but if she was standing in front of me, my first guess would be 32JJ - but I’d have to try her with a few different bras/brands to be sure. She looks low set, slightly west-east, so a full cup or a balconette would work well (or, *would* have worked well - I don’t know what would work now). 

I really like your dissertations that you give and your sharing of knowledge of women. After all, after God created Adam, he realized he had to do a do over and he created Eve which is why the female of the species is the pretty sex and the male is usually cannon fodder. 

[Hiram]

I really like your dissertations that you give and your sharing of knowledge of women.

I agree completely.  Its why I prefer to talk to women and not men.  Not only do that have a larger vocabulary, they also have many interesting perspectives on things - not less their bodies.  I'm a man, I'm never going to have a baby or menopause - and it is fascinating to hear about things I'll never experience.

[Hiram]

Houston I think we've got a problem!

This lady seems to be wearing the wrong size...  I think its going to be a tough one for Margaret as we can't see her back - but cup size wise, I'm think the bra is a F, but she is now a J.

[Margaret]

Houston I think we've got a problem!

This lady seems to be wearing the wrong size...  I think its going to be a tough one for Margaret as we can't see her back - but cup size wise, I'm think the bra is a F, but she is now a J.

Goodness me. Are there other photos of her?

The bra looks to be a 32/34D, maybe 34E. But she looks to be a 34H or 36GG.

[Hiram]

Are there other photos of her?

Nah its the only one I have - I just thought it was apt for this thread.  Probably one of old bras.

[Hiram]

Solomia Maievska.  I can't make my mind up on her size.  Not sure on this one.

She can be seem in motion here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3p_OiD64eA

[Margaret]

Solomia Maievska.  I can't make my mind up on her size.  Not sure on this one.

She can be seem in motion here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3p_OiD64eA

I’m tempted to say 32GG, but she is so slim, soI’m thinking 30HH or even 30J.

(She’s wearing the wrong band size in they video - you can see it riding up in the middle of her back - she needs to go up a band size and down a cup size).

[Hiram]

(She’s wearing the wrong band size in they video - you can see it riding up in the middle of her back - she needs to go up a band size and down a cup size).

I did notice that when I looked at the video again.   There are a few others of her modeling lingerie for Jasmine in Kyiv.


This one looks a bit better - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4qWzLmW_9w

[solvegas]

(She’s wearing the wrong band size in they video - you can see it riding up in the middle of her back - she needs to go up a band size and down a cup size).

I did notice that when I looked at the video again.   There are a few others of her modeling lingerie for Jasmine in Kyiv.


This one looks a bit better - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4qWzLmW_9w

One thing about this video that struck out at me was how the people at the nearby tables weren't even looking at such beautiful women strutting down the runway. 

[Hiram]

One thing about this video that struck out at me was how the people at the nearby tables weren't even looking at such beautiful women strutting down the runway. 

The men were sitting with their wives - and looking would be verboten.

Today's customer in Margaret's boutique - I think she's a G cup going on my my own estimation.