[Margaret]

Here's an oldie but goodie: Pam Brown. Busty model from the 80's and early 90's.

34J maybe?

[Margaret]

Oki doki - I'm posting this pic as - I think think her dimensions may make her tricky to size.  I'm not sure why I think that - maybe it the perkiness of her breasts.

And she has some lovely boobs.

28FF possibly.

[Demora]

Margaret sweetheart, can you give us an approximation for this bra which is obviously being forcefully challenged by Demora Avarice breasts?  Demora is a small woman, only 4'11" tall. From the 2023 AVN, copyright by solvegas. 

It’s difficult to be sure with just that photo, but I’d be guessing she was possibly a 34 back, and up in the KK or L category. However, I’d want to try her in some other bras (36K might be more comfortable for her). But, given that she’s so short, possibly 34L might be about right.

It’s a 80NN from ewa michalak, 34V in US equivalent.

[Shadowmuse Blown]

Margaret sweetheart, can you give us an approximation for this bra which is obviously being forcefully challenged by Demora Avarice breasts?  Demora is a small woman, only 4'11" tall. From the 2023 AVN, copyright by solvegas. 

It’s difficult to be sure with just that photo, but I’d be guessing she was possibly a 34 back, and up in the KK or L category. However, I’d want to try her in some other bras (36K might be more comfortable for her). But, given that she’s so short, possibly 34L might be about right.

It’s a 80NN from ewa michalak, 34V in US equivalent.

<loses consciousness>

[Superion]

Here's an oldie but goodie: Pam Brown. Busty model from the 80's and early 90's.

34J maybe?

She had a reduction around 20 years ago. But, she was J or K cup and still growing. The back pain got to be too much for her. Pam is still young, only around 60ish or so. I'll need to dig up a pic of her after the reduction.

[Margaret]

Margaret sweetheart, can you give us an approximation for this bra which is obviously being forcefully challenged by Demora Avarice breasts?  Demora is a small woman, only 4'11" tall. From the 2023 AVN, copyright by solvegas. 

It’s difficult to be sure with just that photo, but I’d be guessing she was possibly a 34 back, and up in the KK or L category. However, I’d want to try her in some other bras (36K might be more comfortable for her). But, given that she’s so short, possibly 34L might be about right.

It’s a 80NN from ewa michalak, 34V in US equivalent.

Then it’s prettt close to 34KK/L (uk)

[Hiram]

28FF possibly.

I think the smaller women fascinate me more than the bigger women if I was honest.

Okay:  this lady walks into your boutique and asks for some advice.   She removes her blouse and shows you her bra. 

What would be your advice?

[Margaret]

28FF possibly.

I think the smaller women fascinate me more than the bigger women if I was honest.

Okay:  this lady walks into your boutique and asks for some advice.   She removes her blouse and shows you her bra. 

What would be your advice?

She’s not a million miles away from her bra fitting her. The first thing I’d say is that she’s probably wearing the wrong style of bra for her shape. She needs more support in the cups to give her shape. A modern full-cup or balconette/balcony bra would be much better, something double lined like a Curvy Kate Dottie or Victory.

Her straps are working well, but I can’t see the back band - although, it doesn’t look like it’s causing her too much grief. Overall, the cups just seem old-fashioned and lack support.

I reckon she’s probably 32FF/34F - so something in that range would help her.

[TheZookie007]

Bras are very much the most important item in a woman’s wardrobe (possibly a close second is shoes). If you take care of your bras, they’ll take care of you.

Of course, you have to have the correct size, decent brand etc.

But they’re wonderful, powerful garments.

Not a lot of people know this, but there are often 45+ individual components in a bra (I’d love to see one deconstructed), from underwires to straps, lining, elastic, lace, metal loops, plastic, shoulder strap adjusters, thread and material (and the cute little bows in the middle that no longer serve a real purpose).

I can’t think of a more complicated item of clothing.

A sari may "only" be a three-meter-long piece of cloth, but the complete outfit has many other components to it. And there's over one hundred ways to drape a sari.

I also would rank the traditional outfits worn by Japanese geisha and maiko (not the hypersexualized Western knockoffs) as equally as complicated.

[TheZookie007]

She looks short, with a broad back. Possibly 34K?

Je vous remercie.

Out of curiosity - do you think women are getting bustier.  Anecdotally they seem to be.

It's not an academic journal by any means but I remember there was an article in the Daily Mail where they interviewed three sets of three generations of women (grandmom, mom, and daughter) where their bra sizes increased with each succeeding generation. Interesting anecdotal (albeit highly-selected-by-the-editors) "evidence" - although Zoe Williams in The Guardian opines that it may be more easily explained by better bras available in a wider, more accurate range of sizes.

[TheZookie007]

I don’t think they are. I think big-boobed women have always been around. From developing breasts to attract a mate (boobs look like buttocks in the dark) to increases in hormones (the pill) and cosmetic surgery.

Only the labels on their bras have changed. I come from a long line of big boobers (my mum and my sisters all have big boobs) - they not a new thing.

Reminds me of the titillating quote from the follow-up article in the Sunday People that introduced the world to the amazing breasts of Rachel Aldana:

"...Chloe, Natasha and Leanne all come from families with a history of large bosoms.

Natasha said: 'My mum told me that my grandma's were as big as mine, if not bigger.

My family obviously has big boobs stretching back generations.

But people can't believe they're natural and I often get asked by blokes and even girls if they can have a feel because they think silicone.

I tell them I inherited them from my nan.'

The girls believe they would be perfect guinea-pigs for scientific research.

Leanne said: 'The fact that all three of us have big boobs running in our families seems to suggest that there could be some kind of genetic link.

I think a geneticist should look into it. If eye-colour is hereditary, why not boobs?

Imagine the possibilities if they discovered a boob gene. You might be able to clone breasts!'"

[Shadowmuse Blown]

Margaret sweetheart, can you give us an approximation for this bra which is obviously being forcefully challenged by Demora Avarice breasts?  Demora is a small woman, only 4'11" tall. From the 2023 AVN, copyright by solvegas. 

It’s difficult to be sure with just that photo, but I’d be guessing she was possibly a 34 back, and up in the KK or L category. However, I’d want to try her in some other bras (36K might be more comfortable for her). But, given that she’s so short, possibly 34L might be about right.

It’s a 80NN from ewa michalak, 34V in US equivalent.

Then it’s prettt close to 34KK/L (uk)

Im really confused here.  The accompanying chart only goes up to a UK “K” or US “O”, but correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t KK/L cups be the US equivalent of P/Q?  Isn’t there still R,S,T and U before we get to a US “V”.  So, if one were to continue the UK cup sizes, it should be “NN”—which is what Demora said it was—not KK or L.

Define “close”.

[Margaret]

Margaret sweetheart, can you give us an approximation for this bra which is obviously being forcefully challenged by Demora Avarice breasts?  Demora is a small woman, only 4'11" tall. From the 2023 AVN, copyright by solvegas. 

It’s difficult to be sure with just that photo, but I’d be guessing she was possibly a 34 back, and up in the KK or L category. However, I’d want to try her in some other bras (36K might be more comfortable for her). But, given that she’s so short, possibly 34L might be about right.

It’s a 80NN from ewa michalak, 34V in US equivalent.

Then it’s prettt close to 34KK/L (uk)

Im really confused here.  The accompanying chart only goes up to a UK “K” or US “O”, but correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t KK/L cups be the US equivalent of P/Q?  Isn’t there still R,S,T and U before we get to a US “V”.  So, if one were to continue the UK cup sizes, it should be “NN”—which is what Demora said it was—not KK or L.

Define “close”.

Where is this chart from? As far as I know, Ewa bras go up in stepped pairs, like K, KK, L, LL, N, NN etc?

[Big Banana]

Ewa is confusing as they use the same order of letters for cups as the UK system but the cups go up every 2cm rather than inch.

So the bigger you get the more Ewa and UK go out of sync.

[TheZookie007]

Obviously these bra sizes were invented by men! That's why they're so bloody inconsistent and confusing!