[Hiram]

32/34G seems about right.

Okay thanks.

The bigger the boobs, the more weight you’re carrying around - but it’s a difficult thing to define without complex maths/physics.

On the bra size wiki there is a section on this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra_size

For your size 34FF it states your breasts would be 1.8kg.  That weight is going to be noticeable I reckon, especially as you boobs aren't distributed about your body.  A women with 38J is going to be carrying over 5kg! It just goes to show how important a bra is to a woman who is bigger.

As it is her birthday today I thought we should do this Ecuadorian model Antonella Kahllo

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Antonella_Kahllo

32K @ 4.8kg

[Hiram]

https://news.sky.com/story/wearing-correct-sports-bra-can-improve-running-performance-by-up-to-7-research-suggests-12862585

Wearing the correct sports bra may increase running performance by up to 7%, according to a new study.

[Margaret]

32/34G seems about right.

Okay thanks.

The bigger the boobs, the more weight you’re carrying around - but it’s a difficult thing to define without complex maths/physics.

On the bra size wiki there is a section on this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra_size

For your size 34FF it states your breasts would be 1.8kg.  That weight is going to be noticeable I reckon, especially as you boobs aren't distributed about your body.  A women with 38J is going to be carrying over 5kg! It just goes to show how important a bra is to a woman who is bigger.

As it is her birthday today I thought we should do this Ecuadorian model Antonella Kahllo

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Antonella_Kahllo

32K @ 4.8kg

Oh my, she’s beautiful.

32K doesn’t seem too off the mark. And I’m seeing a lot of Curvy Kate bras in her photos, so she’s probably been measured/fitted at some point. She’s possibly 32KK (sometimes her bras look slightly too tight). But she’s big (boobs-wise at least - she’s teeny-tiny in height).

[Hiram]

Oh my, she’s beautiful.

South American women certainly have that extra special ingredient.

She’s possibly 32KK (sometimes her bras look slightly too tight). But she’s big (boobs-wise at least - she’s teeny-tiny in height).

I shall put her down as a 32KK.

Okay closer to home for this next one - Joey Fisher.

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Joey_Fisher - 32H

She has quite rare green eyes.

[Margaret]

Oh my, she’s beautiful.

South American women certainly have that extra special ingredient.

She’s possibly 32KK (sometimes her bras look slightly too tight). But she’s big (boobs-wise at least - she’s teeny-tiny in height).

I shall put her down as a 32KK.

Okay closer to home for this next one - Joey Fisher.

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Joey_Fisher - 32H

She has quite rare green eyes.

I think 32H is a stretch. She is tall, but I’d be thinking more 32G.

[Hiram]

I think 32H is a stretch. She is tall, but I’d be thinking more 32G.

Thanks.

Today I thought I'd try a different body type.

Juliana Simms - https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Juliana_Simms - 40F?

[Margaret]

I think 32H is a stretch. She is tall, but I’d be thinking more 32G.

Thanks.

Today I thought I'd try a different body type.

Juliana Simms - https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Juliana_Simms - 40F?

It’s definitely going to be up in the 38/40 back size, but I’m not sure about F for the cups. I found a photo of her measuring and her overbust is 49”. If she was a 40 back, she would be FF/G, which makes me think it’s more like 40G. 

[Hiram]

Cheers for the 40G. 

Not sure if we've done Yulia Nova before - she isn't on my spreadsheet

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Yulia_Nova

This is the sort of Russkiy Mir I can support.

[Margaret]

Cheers for the 40G. 

Not sure if we've done Yulia Nova before - she isn't on my spreadsheet

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Yulia_Nova

This is the sort of Russkiy Mir I can support.

I’d love to know how they arrive at these figures.

She’s 5’6”, so I don’t think she’s going to have a big back size - certainly not 34.

And her boobs look big, with a lot of projection and west-east set.

I’d be thinking she was more like a 30GG/H.

See attached for what a 30H looks like.

[Hiram]

I’d love to know how they arrive at these figures.

That's why we do this vital work - righting the wrongs of the Internet!

And her boobs look big, with a lot of projection and west-east set.

Okay, this is a new term?

I’d be thinking she was more like a 30GG/H.

Thanks for the comparison pic. 

[Hiram]

Okay then - the next contestant.

Petra Verkaik.

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Petra_Verkaik

The site says 32I (I didn't think there was an 'I') I feel this may be wrong?

[Margaret]

Okay then - the next contestant.

Petra Verkaik.

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Petra_Verkaik

The site says 32I (I didn't think there was an 'I') I feel this may be wrong?

I don’t know where they’re getting that from. 32 is probably about right, given her height. But, I’d say she’s probably a 32G, maybe GG at a push.

In terms of above, west-east is how some women describe how their boobs are set (each boob points a little bit to the west and east). East-west is rare. Some boobs are “low set” - meaning they hang or droop (or the roots are slightly lower down the torso). Then you get full-on-top - where your boobs have a rounded shape at the top of the boobs, or full-on-bottom, where most of the tissue and weight is on the underside. Some women are high set, where their boobs are quite rounded and nearer the top of their torso. Some women are close set, where their boobs sit tightly together in the middle - some women are wide-set, where their boobs are quite far apart (this often happens with implants). And then you have a load of other descriptions (mostly just unofficial or anecdotal) to describe boob shape (often based on fruit) - and there’s also descriptions of nipples that vary too (dinner plates, 45’ record, compact disc, perky, inverted, protruding, volume knob, cleat, soccer stud, light switch, pacifier etc etc etc).

[solvegas]

Okay then - the next contestant.

Petra Verkaik.

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Petra_Verkaik

The site says 32I (I didn't think there was an 'I') I feel this may be wrong?

I don’t know where they’re getting that from. 32 is probably about right, given her height. But, I’d say she’s probably a 32G, maybe GG at a push.

In terms of above, west-east is how some women describe how their boobs are set (each boob points a little bit to the west and east). East-west is rare. Some boobs are “low set” - meaning they hang or droop (or the roots are slightly lower down the torso). Then you get full-on-top - where your boobs have a rounded shape at the top of the boobs, or full-on-bottom, where most of the tissue and weight is on the underside. Some women are high set, where their boobs are quite rounded and nearer the top of their torso. Some women are close set, where their boobs sit tightly together in the middle - some women are wide-set, where their boobs are quite far apart (this often happens with implants). And then you have a load of other descriptions (mostly just unofficial or anecdotal) to describe boob shape (often based on fruit) - and there’s also descriptions of nipples that vary too (dinner plates, 45’ record, compact disc, perky, inverted, protruding, volume knob, cleat, soccer stud, light switch, pacifier etc etc etc).

I saw this post and noticed that it is number 666 for Margaret and I hope that doesn't presage something bad. 

[Margaret]

Okay then - the next contestant.

Petra Verkaik.

https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Petra_Verkaik

The site says 32I (I didn't think there was an 'I') I feel this may be wrong?

I don’t know where they’re getting that from. 32 is probably about right, given her height. But, I’d say she’s probably a 32G, maybe GG at a push.

In terms of above, west-east is how some women describe how their boobs are set (each boob points a little bit to the west and east). East-west is rare. Some boobs are “low set” - meaning they hang or droop (or the roots are slightly lower down the torso). Then you get full-on-top - where your boobs have a rounded shape at the top of the boobs, or full-on-bottom, where most of the tissue and weight is on the underside. Some women are high set, where their boobs are quite rounded and nearer the top of their torso. Some women are close set, where their boobs sit tightly together in the middle - some women are wide-set, where their boobs are quite far apart (this often happens with implants). And then you have a load of other descriptions (mostly just unofficial or anecdotal) to describe boob shape (often based on fruit) - and there’s also descriptions of nipples that vary too (dinner plates, 45’ record, compact disc, perky, inverted, protruding, volume knob, cleat, soccer stud, light switch, pacifier etc etc etc).

I saw this post and noticed that it is number 666 for Margaret and I hope that doesn't presage something bad. 

As long as it’s not some ridiculous bra size.

[Hiram]

In terms of above, west-east is how some women describe how their boobs are set (each boob points a little bit to the west and east).

Jeez, I had no idea - like the Eskimos have lots of words for snow.   It is fascinating to hear how many types of boobs there are (yes, I've seen a lot of variation) but I didn't know you ladies had a term for each type.

East-west is rare. Some boobs are “low set” - meaning they hang or droop (or the roots are slightly lower down the torso). Then you get full-on-top - where your boobs have a rounded shape at the top of the boobs, or full-on-bottom, where most of the tissue and weight is on the underside.

Where possible I wonder if you could illustrate that with some of the models we estimate.  Only if you feel a distinct feature as described above with that individual. 

Some women are high set, where their boobs are quite rounded and nearer the top of their torso. Some women are close set, where their boobs sit tightly together in the middle - some women are wide-set, where their boobs are quite far apart (this often happens with implants). And then you have a load of other descriptions (mostly just unofficial or anecdotal) to describe boob shape (often based on fruit)

The only description I can recall a woman using to describe a type of breast is ski slope shape - where the profile exhibits a ski slope type shape.

and there’s also descriptions of nipples that vary too (dinner plates, 45’ record, compact disc, perky, inverted, protruding, volume knob, cleat, soccer stud, light switch, pacifier etc etc etc).

I am trying to picture each type in my head as I read - some I can identify, and other not so - pacifier?