Quote from: Captain Nemo on May 18, 2024, 12:08:45 PMI'd better clarify. DA's move has nothing to do with my morphing technique or choice of models. I was careful to avoid posting any hardcore porn as defined by DA. The problem was their strict rule against copyright violation. Very few models are so strict as to protest formally against well-altered versions of their images, but I had bad luck to cross one those few, Blondie Bennett. She protested, and since I had posted several of her and one other, I triggered DA's 3-strikes-and-you're-out rule. So I'm out in the cold. I do enjoy one advantage here: I can post porn morphs. Not that I need to, but sometimes a porn image cries for morphing.I would suggest that what you do is well past the 10% change required to avoid copyright infringement, but in today's litigation society, the cost to defend oneself from multiple suits is so prohibitive that it is best to not even start down that path. Such a shame, but IMHO, the ones that protest the loudest or most often are the ones least likely to have altruistic tendencies, but have a single goal, to goad people into paying. I would guess you found one. Others have looked at your work as inspiration, and maybe others as satire; there are just too many people that start screaming every time they feel offended, even when it does not effect them. They have no tolerance for the opinions of others, actions, comedy, and even satire that does not fit their narrow views. Sorry it happened to you Captain, but then again, I like you displaying more of your work here.
I'd better clarify. DA's move has nothing to do with my morphing technique or choice of models. I was careful to avoid posting any hardcore porn as defined by DA. The problem was their strict rule against copyright violation. Very few models are so strict as to protest formally against well-altered versions of their images, but I had bad luck to cross one those few, Blondie Bennett. She protested, and since I had posted several of her and one other, I triggered DA's 3-strikes-and-you're-out rule. So I'm out in the cold. I do enjoy one advantage here: I can post porn morphs. Not that I need to, but sometimes a porn image cries for morphing.
Hey, Bombayduk What is this about "the 10% change required to avoid copyright infringement"? Is that an established precedent? Because it's not (l hope) a question of litigation, but of the possibility of convincing DA to relent. Please tell me more, or direct me to somewhere l can get more information Quote from: Bombayduk on May 20, 2024, 07:26:30 AMQuote from: Captain Nemo on May 18, 2024, 12:08:45 PMI'd better clarify. DA's move has nothing to do with my morphing technique or choice of models. I was careful to avoid posting any hardcore porn as defined by DA. The problem was their strict rule against copyright violation. Very few models are so strict as to protest formally against well-altered versions of their images, but I had bad luck to cross one those few, Blondie Bennett. She protested, and since I had posted several of her and one other, I triggered DA's 3-strikes-and-you're-out rule. So I'm out in the cold. I do enjoy one advantage here: I can post porn morphs. Not that I need to, but sometimes a porn image cries for morphing.I would suggest that what you do is well past the 10% change required to avoid copyright infringement, but in today's litigation society, the cost to defend oneself from multiple suits is so prohibitive that it is best to not even start down that path. Such a shame, but IMHO, the ones that protest the loudest or most often are the ones least likely to have altruistic tendencies, but have a single goal, to goad people into paying. I would guess you found one. Others have looked at your work as inspiration, and maybe others as satire; there are just too many people that start screaming every time they feel offended, even when it does not effect them. They have no tolerance for the opinions of others, actions, comedy, and even satire that does not fit their narrow views. Sorry it happened to you Captain, but then again, I like you displaying more of your work here.
I have a thing for ruthless women--as long as they're hugeboobed.
Ran out of space, hope they're big enough.to be linked to Minka's thread
One of Sila Star I started awhile ago, just now finished. I'll link it to her thread.
Ashley Kimberly Khloe SkönhetWeirdly complex name. BEA software even refuses to post it as title. Really great body though. Will be linked to her threadhttps://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?topic=10004107.msg10569067#msg10569067