[doggo]

Isn't the one on the right a fake?  

Ah, of course it is. Silly of me...

[Liam]

Quote:

Quote:
When I’m uncertain, I usually find answers at joggs.

[Read caption on attached pic.]

You see, you had it all wrong.  She was actually a teen web model and TW stole the pics and posted them at the BEA.  

LMFAO!

I saw what you posted and I am willing to be convinced - but - doesn;t the term 'teen web model' just mean, she was on the web? I mean would a model really be, anonymous, ever?

My post was a joke.  Tongue in cheek.  And I didn’t make that post on joggs.  I thought it was funny.  Whoever wrote that caption was WAY off about her age and I don’t know where he got the bit about 34J at 16.  It was always my understanding she was in her late 20s or older and many of the pics clearly reveal that.

[Liam]

Quote:
The TW image 200 was a good one to digitally review and here are my findings.
Because the image was taken with a flash, slightly over-exposed, and close to the subject I tried a little color isolation and false color effect that isolates items that are flourescent just below the surface of porous clothing. By exaggerating the slight color shift caused by flash upon the reflective difference a rough removal of the upper layer is possible.
In the attached photo this effect also amplifies the slight changes in color within the narrow range of the bra's tones. This also brings out the edges better.

A. The outer edge of the bra does not match the inside edge of her arm. The bra is hovering in space away and downward from her body due to a morph or more likely awkward padding.
B. A very abrupt tone change both below and above this strap again points to a morph but might also indicate an unnatural shift in the angle of the bra fabric to the flash cause by... padding.
C. Dimples that bisect the main cup stitch line though possible from an ill fitting bra, are unlikely in her case but due to the smooth likes above and below suggests a depression from... padding.
D. This is a shadow projected by the flash back against her skin, below the surface of the bra, caused by a mass just visible to the left - this mass is not breast tissue, it has a fold in it!
E. The most distinct shadow (the flash is slightly right to left) is coming from a mass with a hard edge running vertically and has a "flower" or "paisley" image just to the right of this line - definitely padding.



Conclusion: a well padded bra photo - and a fake, sorry TWG fans.

This photo technique works best with monochomatic fabrics taken with a flash where differing surfaces, colors, or fabrics produce subtle iridescence just below the surface.  

I’m sorry Nimrod but your analysis isn’t very convincing:
A.  Simply an ill-fitting bra.  Bras don’t necessarily hug the skin in all places.
B.  I’m not sure what you’re pointing out here.  That’s the end of her hair AND the bra strap is pulled away from her body, proving… nothing.
C.  Ill-fitting bra.
D and E are pointing out the same thing basically.  Yes, some bras do have lining with a paisley pattern, the edge of which is often right where you’re pointing.

And you say nothing about her massive cleavage on display.  Is it photo manipulation?  Or is it real, meaning she would have to have HUGE breasts to begin with in order to create that much cleavage with help of push-up padding or not.

Quote:
I prefer to just point out the obvious... I put these two photo's side by side because the size difference is immense. (but I am sure someone will say that this GIGANTIC size change is due to light... or outfits... or something, and I will shake my head and laugh.)

Anyone who has ever had a well-endowed girlfriend (and I’ve had more than a few) will confirm there IS a gigantic difference in how big their breasts appear on different occasions.  How big a difference?  From, you’d never know she even HAD boobs to…  Dolly Parton.

Quote:
Don't get me wrong, any guy who can get his girl to suit up with giant fake boobs and parade around in psuedo-public... more power to him.

If it was a hoax and she was stuffing…  I cannot imagine a mature woman – we’re not talking about a teenager here – that attractive, with that much going for her, being party to such an infantile stunt that went on for 2 years.  ESPECIALLY with all those photos being taken in public.  Not without being paid large sums of money.

Continuing along this same line of thought, do you notice how relaxed and natural she looks in all the pictures?  She not like, “Look at me, I just stuffed huge falsies under my top and I’m out in public and everyone’s going to point and stare like I’m a freak.”  She looks to me at perfect ease and used to having that body.

[BP]

This is all genuinely interesting. While the color deconstruction provides some quality analysis, I'm still on the side of real. It just varies too much from the other elaborate fakes out there -- loads of different angles, clothes, exteriors -- and I agree that the presence of the "cleavage cleft" is pretty difficult to fake so well.

[sheber]

TW was a man!

[Liam]

Ah so you DID follow the conspiracy!  The Friday cliff-hangers were really something weren’t they?

[doggo]

 

Quote:
TW was a man!

That's true.  

[sheber]

Somehow, just somehow, I knew that you'd get it.  

[Al_Inflatcha]

Quote:
 Anyone who has ever had a well-endowed girlfriend (and I’ve had more than a few) will confirm there IS a gigantic difference in how big their breasts appear on different occasions. How big a difference? From, you’d never know she even HAD boobs to… Dolly Parton.

HAH!  I knew it... I am like the Nostradamus of Internet discussion... My large breasted woman can't seem to hide herself that much... from barely pushing an overshirt out to hanging down to her waistband, and projecting out 12 inches?  Maybe she has inflatable breasts... or a magic bra that adds five cup sizes?  But maybe my brain is just polluted with reality.

Quote:
 If it was a hoax and she was stuffing… I cannot imagine a mature woman – we’re not talking about a teenager here – that attractive, with that much going for her, being party to such an infantile stunt that went on for 2 years. ESPECIALLY with all those photos being taken in public. Not without being paid large sums of money.  

The FDD girls seem pretty relaxed... and I don't recall a single photo of TW with another person in the frame... ever... not in the background, not with her... (feel free to correct me on that one... I am obviously not as much of a fan as a lot of people.)  Also, even my limited ability with a camera, I have gone through well over 200 photo's in a single day while on vacation... what would make it so hard to go through 200 photo's in a day if you were trying, and call it two years?  (I will agree that the hair color appears to change in places, but my ex was willing to wear falsies every now and then... how much begging would it have taken to take some shots in a secluded park someplace?  Probably not much.)

In any case, I call's em as I see's em... its my opinion, but I will more readily believe that some of the girls from FDD are real before I believe TW, in all of her blurriness, and random sized boobs, is real.

[Connoisseur]

I'm sure that she was real.

1.  She is not that large.  I have actually had two girl friends who were larger.  Why wouldn't a hoaxster create more exciting images?

2.  Her breasts are far from an optimum fantasy shape.

3.  She is a hairy armed, hairy legged, sandal sporting, cell phone wearing, slightly plumb, conservatively dressing, thirtyish woman who doesn't seem to be the ideal choice for a hoax model.

4.  There is remarkable consistency in the breasts from image to image.  This virtually rules out photomanipulation.

5.  She wears a custom bra, which seems to an unnecessary extravagance for a hoax.

[doggo]

 

Quote:
1. ...Why wouldn't a hoaxster create more exciting images?

Good point: the natural temptation, if perpetrating a hoax, would be to make the images 'sexy' - in fact, the hoaxer would probably tend to go over the top, in some images, at least.
 

Quote:
2. Her breasts are far from an optimum fantasy shape.

Well, that depends on your particular optimum fantasy.
 

Quote:
3. She is a hairy armed, hairy legged, sandal sporting, cell phone wearing, slightly plumb, conservatively dressing, thirtyish woman who doesn't seem to be the ideal choice for a hoax model.

While I take your point about her being a typical choice for a hoax of this nature, lay off the hairy armed, hairy legged, sandal sporting, cell phone wearing, slightly plump, conservatively dressing, thirtyish women, OK?
 

Quote:
5. She wears a custom bra, which seems to an unnecessary extravagance for a hoax.

That would be the clincher for me. A 34J bra may or may not be a custom size but it is an unusually large size for a guy to have lying around his apartment. Assuming he did find it lying around his apartment, where is the bra's original owner? Why would she abandon such an expensive undergarment?

If TW (who we have established is a man) wanted such a bra, he'd have to go out and buy one. An unnecessary extravagance, as Connoisseur points out. And if he's going to that kind of expense, why not get a really big one? Why draw the line at a piddly little J-cup?

"You want me to what? In some other woman's bra?"
"It's not some other woman's, I just paid $99.95 for it. Nobody will notice you. Just for an hour or so, while I take 207 photos."
"And what are you going to do with these 207 photos? No, don't tell me!"
"That's disgusting, Clarice, you're just a hairy-armed, hairy-legged, cell-phone-wearing..."
"...So where do you expect me to carry my phone...?"
"...And I don't think of you that way."
"Well, thanks a bunch! So you're going to..."
"That's right! I'm going to give them away to all the millions of wankers out there on the Internet!"
"Oooh, Tarquin Watkinson, I love it when you talk dirty! Let's do it!"
"No, we've got to do something about that face first..."

[SwitcherX]

I've always thought she was real.  This belief isn't based on anything in any of the photos, but rather on the photos themselves.  TW posted 207 of them, a couple at a time, over 2 1/2 years.  To spend all of the time to morph that many pictures and then only post them a little at a time, or morph a couple at a time and then post them and then repeat it 100 times, would take a seriously obsessive-compulsive personality.  Or manic personality, whatever it's called.

I don't see this being a hoax because where's the payoff?  TW hasn't made a post saying "Ha ha!  I fooled you all!  Here's how I did it..."  Did he do it so that all of us would wonder if TW Girl was real for years to come?  Then he even fooled a guy from Playboy.

If it was a hoax, there's only 1 thing to say.  Bravo TW.  Well done.

[doggo]

 

Quote:
TW hasn't made a post saying "Ha ha! I fooled you all! Here's how I did it..." Did he do it so that all of us would wonder if TW Girl was real for years to come? Then he even fooled a guy from Playboy.

Fooling several thousand breast-fans would be a great deal harder than fooling some bloke from Playboy. But it would be strange behaviour for TW not to have claimed responsibility for a hoax, long before now. Although if he had, half of us would have refused to believe him.

Quote:
If it was a hoax, there's only 1 thing to say. Bravo TW. Well done.

Somehow I hope he's reading this. All this time ago and we're still talking about it. Just think, somebody - not TW, because she dumped him - might have been shagging her just last night. But of course, if the guy told us that, half of us wouldn't believe him, either. (The other half.)

[Calanen]

There is nothing so remarkable that would make them seem to be a hoax or worthy of it. In Australia at least, there are a lot of girls that big - and some even with the small bust to waste ration (I saw one in the city today, and just about crashed into a bench in Martin Place. And they were obviously not fakes, and her ass was tiny!)

As for hairy arms, its a rumour, but maybe has some truth real one - ive heard that hairy armed women (note I said women, not trannies, transgender etc before every1 posts about how Calanen sleeps with men wearing drag) is a sign of high sex drive. Just a rumour or old wives tale as they say, but may have some basis in fact..... She certainly seemed like a lot of fun type person for showing up to the camera. As to her in her 30s - my gues would be 26-28 in the phots. But its just a guess. Early 30s seems a bit old, but you cant see the face so its hard to tell. Even if some of the photos have been enhanced, she is still a very big girl. Lets hope she did not get them reduced.

[doggo]

Quote:
In Australia at least, there are a lot of girls that big...

Must be the sunshine, or something in the water. Now, let's see, QF030 leaves LHR at 1225...

But yeah, it's not as if TW's girl was impossibly huge. If she was, they wouldn't make J-cup bras. Some people refuse to believe if they haven't seen for themselves.

Quote:
...hairy armed women (note I said women, not trannies, transgender etc before every1 posts about how Calanen sleeps with men wearing drag...

Better stop digging, mate.

I couldn't possibly comment on the relative sex drive of hairy-armed women but it's a nice thing to wonder about.

Are any statistics available on incidences of infertility among twenty-something women who wear mobile telephones around their waists?

I seem to remember her age being given as mid-twenties when the pics were still being released. The same time as they told us her bra size. Not that her age makes any difference to her development: she could have been anywhere between her mid-teens and about thirty when she attained her full size.