Who is bigger? Chelsea, Beshine or someone else? MERGED

Argyle · « **Reply #210 on:** December 20, 2004, 10:46:37 AM »

Not my cup of tea, but an observation:

Melanie has the right idea--short of measuring their breasts, heights, waists, and coming up with a formula that takes all of that into consideration, you've asked a question that is in fact impossible to answer, let alone attain a consensus. Good luck.

But why no mention of Lolo Ferrari? She was gigungous.

GoCubsGo · « **Reply #211 on:** December 20, 2004, 01:01:22 PM »

Chelsea and her friends

Hentaibee · « **Reply #212 on:** December 20, 2004, 01:40:16 PM »

proportions are baloney.

Sheer volume is all that counts

Old_Chestnut · « **Reply #213 on:** December 21, 2004, 01:15:58 AM »

All right, last one of these. This top isn't in the "Changing Chelsea" video, but it is from one of the fairly early photo sets. This is maybe closer to how her older shirts would fit currently... (and it's easier to do this using something with a solid color).

GoCubsGo · « **Reply #214 on:** January 03, 2005, 12:34:47 PM »

OH MY GOD !!!!!

Pixeltiger · « **Reply #215 on:** January 03, 2005, 12:42:57 PM »

More proof, if any were needed, that Chelsea is the queen. While I loved 80's godesses like Wendy Whoppers, Sarenna Lee et al, Chelsea has raised the bar.

Certainly in terms of sheer size I doubt she will ever be matched. (Unless string becomes available again)

Pixeltiger

cleavageking · « **Reply #216 on:** January 03, 2005, 12:50:00 PM »

WOW she looks bigger than ever in that last pic!

Does anyone know if her bust measurement has increased.
Ive heard she has them drained to stop the growth (dunno if thats true). I never hear any progressive measurements anymore her assets size always remains static.

Let me know people in the know. Im thinking much like Melonie Charm she has reached her threshold of comfortability, plus also her skin stretchability and therefore is no longer growing at all.

P.S let em grow chelsea let em grow

C.K

Pixeltiger · « **Reply #217 on:** January 03, 2005, 01:21:58 PM »

Quote:

Im thinking much like Melonie Charm she has reached her threshold of comfortability, plus also her skin stretchability and therefore is no longer growing at all.

"comfortability"? Is that like bouncebackability?

When last I hung out with Chelsea (4 months ago) she said they were still growing. She didn't say anything about getting them drained although I didn't specifically ask.

Pixeltiger

GoCubsGo · « **Reply #220 on:** January 05, 2005, 02:39:47 PM »

Chelsea Charms in November 2001 from:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chelseacharms2

Could you picture her being your Prom date in this dress ?

Whink · « **Reply #221 on:** January 05, 2005, 07:19:31 PM »

Oh hell yes, GoCubsGo, I could picture marrying her in that dress!

LOL

Old_Chestnut · « **Reply #222 on:** January 06, 2005, 11:24:27 AM »

As huge as she was then in that white sheath dress, I had to expand her somewhat over 20% linearly to bring that picture into line with the proportions she has now...

Whink · « **Reply #223 on:** January 06, 2005, 12:27:26 PM »

Mon Dieu, Doux Jésus Seigneur! Votre travail est très splendide et très réalistique! Formidable!!

BarneyFife · « **Reply #224 on:** January 06, 2005, 04:50:07 PM »

hahahahahahaha,I can't believe the side by sides Chelsea before and after pics.I mean this in a good way in the white dress I just can't see chelsea being that big.I have been a member for a long time on chelsea's site and the current pics of the christmas outfit don't seem to be nearly as big as the new proposed before and after in the white dress.I wish Chelsea would put on some of those old clothes just to see if she is actually that much bigger.The pics at the convention make her look massive but the new pics just shot don't seem as massive.

Re: Is Chelsea really the biggest? Well...

Re: Is Chelsea really the biggest? Well...