[salem]

Busty Magazine covers Part 28: Tiffany Towers

[solvegas]

Such an amazing combination of sheer beauty, great fake breasts and a ability to be able to suck the chrome of a bumper. 

[solvegas]

Tiffany Towers, born Tiffany Armarziano on December 19, 1971 in Toronto, Canada, will be 49 years old in a couple of months. Hard to believe I remember seeing her first in 1990 in Gent magazine with her first set of smaller implants and my eyes bugged out.  She was so beautiful facially and body wise. Found out she was only 5'2" tall, so she was/is small. Later on she got bigger implants and she was amazing. I still have that old VHS tape of Boobarella which came out in 1992. I've been smitten since. 

[MaxBigfoot]

Tiffany gives me a hard on even if the picture is just her face.  She's got the most awesome sexy/cute face.   

[solvegas]

Way back in early 1990 when she was a new sensation with her first set of implants. 

[Margaret]

I’ve been browsing around and googling to try and find out more about this immensely beautiful woman. I gather she’s retired now?

Many websites seem to list her bra size as 32G/FF.

Not. A. Chance.

I know this, because I’m 32FF - and her boobs are waaaaay bigger than mine.

It’s difficult to tell, because she’s so petite and slim in most of her photos, and from what I gather, she wasn’t/isn’t tall - maybe 5’3” or 5’4” - although, that doesn’t seem right, as she looks tall in many of of her photos when she’s with other women (maybe they’re small too?) or wearing stilloes.

With all this in mind, I suspect she’s not a 32 back - probably more like a 30 back, but it’s possible, depending on the bra. She’s almost definitely in the K/KK or maybe L cup range - certainly before her reduction.

I’m estimating, if I were to fit her (as she was before she had her reduction), she’d be a 32KK or 30L.

[solvegas]

Click it. 

[Kopy Kat]

Ah, those 90's blown up numbers. "Ninety-eight inches around!?" I'd tape measure various stuff around my house and.......be all kinds of confuzzled afterwards.

[solvegas]

Ah, those 90's blown up numbers. "Ninety-eight inches around!?" I'd tape measure various stuff around my house and.......be all kinds of confuzzled afterwards.

Back in the 80's and 90's the rule of thumb was that you essentially doubled or more the actual breast measurement around the fullest part of the breast.  Sometimes, you gave the centimeters number and magically transform it into inches also. It's all marketing. 

[T Dog 101]

My boobs are 500,000XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

[solvegas]

A classic movie. I have the VHS and DVD versions stashed away in my spare bedroom closet. 

[solvegas]

From a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. 

[phonehome1]

I’ve been browsing around and googling to try and find out more about this immensely beautiful woman. I gather she’s retired now?

Many websites seem to list her bra size as 32G/FF.

Not. A. Chance.

I know this, because I’m 32FF - and her boobs are waaaaay bigger than mine.

It’s difficult to tell, because she’s so petite and slim in most of her photos, and from what I gather, she wasn’t/isn’t tall - maybe 5’3” or 5’4” - although, that doesn’t seem right, as she looks tall in many of of her photos when she’s with other women (maybe they’re small too?) or wearing stilloes.

With all this in mind, I suspect she’s not a 32 back - probably more like a 30 back, but it’s possible, depending on the bra. She’s almost definitely in the K/KK or maybe L cup range - certainly before her reduction.

I’m estimating, if I were to fit her (as she was before she had her reduction), she’d be a 32KK or 30L.

Yes phonehome1 we get it, US and UK sizes are different. Perhaps you could have made the point without being so rude about it.

Post removed for unnecessarily rude and ill-informed comments. I include a graphic of comparisons with US and UK bra sizing's.

You can clearly see that a UK DD and a US DD are the same, blowing your argument completely out of the water. There is also no difference between band sizes in the US and UK, so a 32DD is the same in the US and the UK.

The idea that Tiffany Towers would ever be considered a 32FF is frankly laughable.

Finally the 'plus 4' sizing satandard is redundant and harks back to a time when bras were not as elesticated as they are now. I include a link about bra sizing from Curvy Kate.

https://www.curvykate.com/blogs/news/want-to-know-the-real-reason-why-women-are-wearing-the-wrong-bra-size#:~:text=The%20'Plus%204'%20Fitting%20method,from%20the%20difference%20in%20measurements.%22&text=Today%20specialist%20bra%20fitters%20(that's,don't%20'measure'.

[Margaret]

I’ve been browsing around and googling to try and find out more about this immensely beautiful woman. I gather she’s retired now?

Many websites seem to list her bra size as 32G/FF.

Not. A. Chance.

I know this, because I’m 32FF - and her boobs are waaaaay bigger than mine.

It’s difficult to tell, because she’s so petite and slim in most of her photos, and from what I gather, she wasn’t/isn’t tall - maybe 5’3” or 5’4” - although, that doesn’t seem right, as she looks tall in many of of her photos when she’s with other women (maybe they’re small too?) or wearing stilloes.

With all this in mind, I suspect she’s not a 32 back - probably more like a 30 back, but it’s possible, depending on the bra. She’s almost definitely in the K/KK or maybe L cup range - certainly before her reduction.

I’m estimating, if I were to fit her (as she was before she had her reduction), she’d be a 32KK or 30L.

This is because and it has been explained to you MULTIPLE TIMES  but you refuse to get through you thick fucking heads  the DIFFERENCE between the US "plus 4" system which was THE WORLD STANDARD for going on 100 years and for the most part still is and your utterly BULLSHIT "look at me I SOUND so big" UK standard which until 20 years ago NO ONE outside the UK had ever even heard of and EVEN UK models in the 80's "page 3 girls"like Samantha Fox, Debbie Jordam and a simular busty blonde who went by "Debbie Q" and then 10 or so years later the first wave of "the all natural girls" LDM, Lorna Morgan Chole Verrier etc etc none of whom tried to claim to be Z cups or what ever by using your bullshit UK sizing sizing which was only popularized to further the "their must be something in the water" MYTH that all women in the UK were packing big tits, that D cups were just training bras  when objective studies using the US standard said that the difference between US women and UK women was only about one cup size and when you controlled for BF/BMI IE screened out the FAT girls it was less than one cup size so to support this myth enter your bullshit "I sound so big" UK sizing system

The average band size for US women for decades has been from 34 to 38 inches 36 inches being the average

Christy Canyon, 5'7" 125 or so size 6 a 36DD and "big boned girls" like "Samatha 38G" and plenty of examples of models and porn stars  at or around  5'4" and 110 give or take that are/were 34 somethings , drop down to 5 foot and 95 and you get mostly 32's and FEW as in VERY FEW 30's and then we are talking like 4'10 and 90 pounds and NO ONE unless we are talking "little people" with 28's     , 

Here is the bottom line you take ANY woman and measure her using the US standard she will be X and then use the UK system and instantly her band size is 4 inches smaller and then "magically" her cup size is 4 cup sizes BIGGER  and "presto" a woman that ANY guy in the US who has seen, got his hands on, took bra shoping to Victoria Secret or at least got a peek at the tag on bra of a woman 5'4" 110 and a 34B maybe borderline C is all the sudden claiming to be a 30DD 

Some one who is probably at best a DD claiming to be a FF
 

I guess this was inevitable: a man angrily explaining bra sizing/fitting to a woman.

[BacE]

And even he got it partially wrong, The cupsize difference comes from the antiquated imperial system (1 inch per cupsize) and the rest of the world metric system (2cm per cupsize). In the small sizes there isn't much difference, but every 4 US cupsizes equals 5 in the rest of the world. So
D      = DD/E
FF/G = HH/I
H      = J
K      = N

And there is also differences between manufacturers, I once went bra shopping with an ex-girlfriend, because she'd outgrown her 80D bra, and all the bras she tried on in differend stores ranged from 80D to 80F.

It's  time for a new global system, where the cupsize is defined by volumetric measurement intstead of a linear  measurement. Implants are defined in cc's, why not cup-sizes?