I have mentioned it before but when morphed images start to creep in to this particular thread I just feel that it is wrong. There are hundreds of other threads at the BEA with morphs, and a whole dedication section. Why do they need to infiltrate this comparison of large and small breasts thread?
It must be that it comes down to celebrating the reality that the real world can be just as titillating, if not more so, without fabricating some artificial exaggeration. When you can show two real obviously beautiful women in the same photo that have radically different proportions what that actually shows is that beauty, allure, sexiness, or whatever does not come with a predetermined size.
If you just find some random couple of B cups and artificially photo-manipulate one up to an F you are actually introducing all sorts of other issues that are not part of this thread;
1) Did one woman need the boost for some reason?
2) Was she not good enough?
3) Is all it takes is a larger set of hoots?
4) Why create a comparison that was not really there?
5) If there was not then why include a photo that actually did not show a comparison and not fit the thread?
6) Why lie about it... Why create such a difference when there was not to start with?
7) Fabrication of this sort shows either lazy image searching, an over-emphasis on importance of boob size and beauty, a deliberate intent to deceive, an inability to follow a thread theme, or possibly an innocent gullibility to not stop and actually look at an image to see that it has been conspicuously fabricated.
Sorry for the rant, but I find the real and exhilarating range of women to be inspiration enough and when you can show two that happen to be at either end of the spectrum it is all the more reaffirming. The creation of some false or nonexistent difference here just feels like too much of an insult to everyone.