*

Lesbian Bob

  • F Cup
  • 983
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #195 on: January 21, 2008, 06:04:56 PM »
Busty Dusty and friends, arranged in order of size.

*

trinks007

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 25
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #196 on: January 21, 2008, 10:09:40 PM »
OMG!  I remember that picture from the back of a dvd case.  I remember going to Best Buy all the time and looking for it in the "special interest" section.  It was the first time I'd seen breasts that size and from that moment, I was hooked.

*

g0ddmode

  • G Cup
  • 931
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #197 on: January 22, 2008, 11:25:19 PM »
Quote:

Lesbian Bob said:
Busty Dusty and friends, arranged in order of size.


That is Shae Marks, in the middle. Gawd, she was so hot. Too bad she had them reduced.

*

g0ddmode

  • G Cup
  • 931
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #198 on: January 22, 2008, 11:26:15 PM »
Quote:

trinks007 said:
OMG!  I remember that picture from the back of a dvd case.  I remember going to Best Buy all the time and looking for it in the "special interest" section.  It was the first time I'd seen breasts that size and from that moment, I was hooked.




That was from Playboy's Voluptuous Vixens, Vol 1.

*

Goldeneye

  • The Midas Look
  • 12443
  • The Midas Look
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #199 on: January 23, 2008, 01:30:23 AM »
Quote:

trinks007 said:
OMG!  I remember that picture from the back of a dvd case.  I remember going to Best Buy all the time and looking for it in the "special interest" section.  It was the first time I'd seen breasts that size and from that moment, I was hooked.




OMG OMG OMG OMG me too! My fucking 8th or 9th grade year, in Suncoast at the mall! Holy FUCK, I'd get the biggest throbbing hardon when I passed by that box. Had so much still to discover...

*

TF22

  • J Cup
  • 390
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #200 on: January 23, 2008, 11:48:48 AM »
 (Image removed by moderator.)
At least one person in this photograph is too young to be posted here.  This is your second warning for violations of the same rule.  Please review the Forum Rules prohibiting chi|d pornography.  Your next post of a minor-aged photo subject will cause you to lose access to the BEA forums.

*

Goldeneye

  • The Midas Look
  • 12443
  • The Midas Look
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #201 on: January 24, 2008, 01:13:31 AM »
Morph.

*

TF22

  • J Cup
  • 390
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #202 on: January 24, 2008, 02:10:10 PM »
Quote:

TF22 said:
 (Image removed by moderator.)
At least one person in this photograph is too young to be posted here.  This is your second warning for violations of the same rule.  Please review the Forum Rules prohibiting chi|d pornography.  Your next post of a minor-aged photo subject will cause you to lose access to the BEA forums.





I understand and apologize for the violation, but I'm curious about how you found out that one of the subjects was too young, so I can avoid this problem in the future. Was it a famous picture (or rather series of pictures) or something? I found the picture on another forum which didn't mention anything of the sort, and both looked of age (to me). Honest mistake. I guess I should just avoid posting any picture that doesn't look at least 25.

*

gonZo

  • pain in the ass moderator
  • 9725
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #203 on: January 24, 2008, 02:18:42 PM »
That's probably not a bad idea.  

The girl on the right in the photo looks much younger than 18, and the photo (which probably originated on my*space, though I haven't checked) has been posted here and removed by moderators several times.  We judge girls' ages by appearance rather than actual age, because it's just about impossible to find out the actual age of anybody on the web.  For more information, please see the Forum Rules.

If you have any doubts about pictures you'd like to post in the future, feel free to contact any moderator before posting to ask if a picture is ok.

*

TF22

  • J Cup
  • 390
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #204 on: January 24, 2008, 02:23:51 PM »
Quote:

gonZo said:
That's probably not a bad idea.  

The girl on the right in the photo looks much younger than 18, and the photo (which probably originated on my*space, though I haven't checked) has been posted here and removed by moderators several times.  We judge girls' ages by appearance rather than actual age, because it's just about impossible to find out the actual age of anybody on the web.  For more information, please see the Forum Rules.

If you have any doubts about pictures you'd like to post in the future, you can always contact a moderator before posting to ask if a picture is ok.





Gotcha, I usually do ask, but some of the other images in the series make both subjects look entirely of age to me.

So it's not that she actually is under 18, but that she appears that way to you guys. That's actually a relief because, it's certainly no fun to find out I've been distributing illicit material.

For arguments' sake, had I cropped the girl on the right out, would it have been fine?

*

gonZo

  • pain in the ass moderator
  • 9725
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #205 on: January 24, 2008, 02:35:30 PM »
Purely on the basis of apparent age, it would probably be ok (though other mods might not agree).  However, I'm pretty sure the photo originated on my*space, so any slice of it would still be prohibited here.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #206 on: January 24, 2008, 02:37:25 PM »
Quote:

TF22 said:
Quote:

gonZo said:
That's probably not a bad idea.  

The girl on the right in the photo looks much younger than 18, and the photo (which probably originated on my*space, though I haven't checked) has been posted here and removed by moderators several times.  We judge girls' ages by appearance rather than actual age, because it's just about impossible to find out the actual age of anybody on the web.  For more information, please see the Forum Rules.

If you have any doubts about pictures you'd like to post in the future, you can always contact a moderator before posting to ask if a picture is ok.





Gotcha, I usually do ask, but some of the other images in the series make both subjects look entirely of age to me.

So it's not that she actually is under 18, but that she appears that way to you guys. That's actually a relief because, it's certainly no fun to find out I've been distributing illicit material.

For arguments' sake, had I cropped the girl on the right out, would it have been fine?




Hi, this is Palomine, one of gonZo's colleagues. I'm afraid that I can't answer your question because I didn't see the original image before it was removed, but if the other subject was clearly of age then yes, cropping out the younger-looking subject would have made the image ok to post here. Again: since it's not practical to identify with certainty the age of any subject in an image, we err on the side of caution to avoid liability. Thus, when you are forming an opinion about a subjects age in order to decide to post here, please remember that your idea of what looks 18 might still seem iffy/borderline to other users (and non-user visitors: the forum is open to the entire unregistered public) so, if you'll feel better using your own idea of what looks '25' as a minimum, that's one way to avoid differences of opinion and future possible issues.

Thanks for being understanding about this... the BEA Owner is very particular about underag3/borderline content and rightly so. Your help in keeping our forums healthy is appreciated.

*

TF22

  • J Cup
  • 390
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #207 on: January 24, 2008, 03:04:21 PM »
Quote:

Palomine said:

Hi, this is Palomine, one of gonZo's colleagues. I'm afraid that I can't answer your question because I didn't see the original image before it was removed, but if the other subject was clearly of age then yes, cropping out the younger-looking subject would have made the image ok to post here. Again: since it's not practical to identify with certainty the age of any subject in an image, we err on the side of caution to avoid liability. Thus, when you are forming an opinion about a subjects age in order to decide to post here, please remember that your idea of what looks 18 might still seem iffy/borderline to other users (and non-user visitors: the forum is open to the entire unregistered public) so, if you'll feel better using your own idea of what looks '25' as a minimum, that's one way to avoid differences of opinion and future possible issues.

Thanks for being understanding about this... the BEA Owner is very particular about underag3/borderline content and rightly so. Your help in keeping our forums healthy is appreciated.




Thanks to both of you for answering my questions, and I'm sorry to bug you guys. I was just a little taken aback that something so subjective puts me one step from being banned. Again, I completely understand why you guys must be quick on the trigger and the value of being safe versus sorry, so I think I'm just going to cease posting candids for the rest of my time here

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #208 on: January 24, 2008, 03:11:19 PM »
 Well, in most cases we offer warnings for violations before banning unless their are prior violations, such as has happened here. If you'd received as many unpleasant threatening cease-and-desist letters as the Owner has, you'd probably insist on a very cautious policy too, especially when it comes to subjective yet risky material.

Just err on the side of caution like we do and you'll be fine. If you're still not sure, feel free to PM any mod and ask for a 2nd opinion before you post.  

*

r2d2

  • G Cup
  • 1476
Re: Big Tits versus Little Tits aka Large Small breast comparisons MERGED
« Reply #209 on: January 24, 2008, 08:10:42 PM »
Rebecca Pauline (someone we don't see nearly enough of here) and her much more modestly endowed friend