*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2070 on: January 31, 2012, 01:51:17 PM »
 :)
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2071 on: February 07, 2012, 06:24:55 PM »
 :)
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

ayrton

  • F Cup
  • 903
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2072 on: February 08, 2012, 07:30:39 AM »
Is it just me,  or do the vintage models have perkier tits than present day models.   Today their tits seem to lay flat whereas back then they stuck out farther.   

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2073 on: February 08, 2012, 10:27:27 AM »
Is it just me,  or do the vintage models have perkier tits than present day models.   Today their tits seem to lay flat whereas back then they stuck out farther.   
Maybe back then their breasts spent more time in bras.
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

gonZo

  • pain in the ass moderator
  • 9716
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2074 on: February 09, 2012, 12:43:20 PM »
Ah, the good old days before we cranked up the gravity.

*

pilotblaze

  • XYZZY Cup
  • 2818
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2075 on: February 10, 2012, 09:59:11 PM »

Is it just me,  or do the vintage models have perkier tits than present day models.   Today their tits seem to lay flat whereas back then they stuck out farther.   

Having been aware of pics from wayback for much of my life, I think I can safely say that BBWs back then sagged like BBWs today.

But, I'd conjecture that the women in a lot of the vintage shots were often more of the slender&stacked variety.  People in the pinup industry, wouldn't you say that might have been influenced by many of the models coming from burlesque and stripping - e.g. dancer physiques?  And I do think a lot of the models you'd see as perky were probably petite, too (check a lot of the shots above). 

SO - slender and stacked, or petite - that makes dimensionally smaller boobs look proportionally larger.  Dimensionally smaller means lighter - and lighter means less droop and sag.

Opinions?

-D'Artagnian

I Am: Surfing With The Alien, while gripping The Bells Of Lal (part 2).
           Please don't slip on the Snake Oil, Mr. Spock.

Holdsworth Lives.

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2076 on: February 10, 2012, 10:01:40 PM »
Having been aware of pics from wayback for much of my life, I think I can safely say that BBWs back then sagged like BBWs today.

But, I'd conjecture that the women in a lot of the vintage shots were often more of the slender&stacked variety.  People in the pinup industry, wouldn't you say that might have been influenced by many of the models coming from burlesque and stripping - e.g. dancer physiques?  And I do think a lot of the models you'd see as perky were probably petite, too (check a lot of the shots above). 

SO - slender and stacked, or petite - that makes dimensionally smaller boobs look proportionally larger.  Dimensionally smaller means lighter - and lighter means less droop and sag.

Opinions?

-D'Artagnian



In the '70s, for sure.
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2077 on: February 11, 2012, 12:20:32 PM »
 ???
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

JJ

  • P Cup
  • 3282
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2078 on: February 11, 2012, 10:12:58 PM »
Arlene Bell .gif animation -  :D ;) :)
Member since June 01, 2001

Get most of your news from television and all you'll know is what the anchorette info babes (& guys) spin your way! (Maddow, Costello, Sawyer, Brzezinski, Mitchell, Scarborough,etc.  )

 Get most of your news from television comics (Behar, O'Donnell, Stewart, Colbert, Sharpton, Letterman, Maher, Whoopi, etc.) and all you'll know is sarcasm and mordacity.

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2079 on: February 13, 2012, 05:47:39 AM »
 :)
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2080 on: February 14, 2012, 09:45:37 AM »
  :'(
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2081 on: February 14, 2012, 10:45:34 PM »
.
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2082 on: February 21, 2012, 10:03:19 AM »
 Happy Fat Tuesday y`all.
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

toomuch

  • E Cup
  • 1118
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2083 on: February 21, 2012, 11:21:15 AM »
I love Karen Brown. Especially here:

« Last Edit: February 21, 2012, 11:23:03 AM by toomuch »

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Thanks For The Mammaries
« Reply #2084 on: February 21, 2012, 06:20:51 PM »
"Why all the fat comments?"

Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.