i've been curious to know what's up with the star ratings. if your peers vote you to a low rating, can that change your priviledges on the board? and who the hell would want to rate another person in stars from one to five? evaluating films on a one-to-five scale is meaningless enough, but to measure people that way is insulting. i assume it's only been used in sport, but the software seems to present it in a straightforward and humorless tone. is it supposed to be like a warning percentage on AIM? or is the idea simple to "rate" people based on how well you like their opinions, or their prose, or humor...?