[Palomine]

This unmorphed, unaltered photo is my new favorite evidence of LSG at her maximum appeal. I think Julianna Margulies is saying something like, "Damn, girl! Whatever you've got going on inside that sweater, you ought to share some of it with me and Reese!" Laura looks slightly embarrassed, but proud. Justifiably proud.

In comparison, Reese looks like a surly, malnourished boy. In her prime, Laura had the figure of a 1970's Playmate: before Hef started in on all the generic-looking implanted blondes.

Awesome pic... thanks Jim!

[jimmarg]

In comparison, Reese looks like a surly, malnourished boy. In her prime, Laura had the figure of a 1970's Playmate: before Hef started in on all the generic-looking implanted blondes.

Awesome pic... thanks Jim!

Palomine's mention of Playboy reminds me: I'm sure you all saw Playboy's announcement of Oct. 13. Well, I had a dream/nightmare that back on Oct. 12 Laura had called Playboy's offices to say, "If the offer you made several years ago still stands, I'm now ready to do a nude layout," only to be told, "We're sorry, Miss San Giacomo, but as of next March Playboy will no longer publish naked photos, and we are set through then." Apparently I cried so loudly in my **82** my neighbors thought someone had died. 

[jimmarg]

In comparison, Reese looks like a surly, malnourished boy. In her prime, Laura had the figure of a 1970's Playmate: before Hef started in on all the generic-looking implanted blondes.

Awesome pic... thanks Jim!

Then I had this dream. The problem is I keep waking up before I can open the magazine.

[Palomine]

Then I had this dream. The problem is I keep waking up.

Our universe would be an incrementally (but noticeably) better place to inhabit if there had been such an issue of Playboy. Thanks jim!  

[jimmarg]

Our universe would be an incrementally (but noticeably) better place to inhabit if there had been such an issue of Playboy. Thanks jim!  

Not to be picky, but I have to disagree with the idea that the universe would be "incrementally better." I'm pretty certain that if such an issue had existed it would have ushered in an era of International Peace and Contentment that would have been written about in history books! No one with such a magazine in hand (ahem) would want to go to war. I don't blame Laura for the state of the world (she has to do what she has to do); I'm not sure future generations will be as forgiving. (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it.)

[Palomine]

Not to be picky, but I have to disagree with the idea that the universe would be "incrementally better." I'm pretty certain that if such an issue had existed it would have ushered in an era of International Peace and Contentment that would have been written about in history books! No one with such a magazine in hand (ahem) would want to go to war. I don't blame Laura for the state of the world (she has to do what she has to do); I'm not sure future generations will be as forgiving. (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it.)

While I can understand and empathize with your position my esteemed colleague, I must respectfully disagree. While it is possible for a LSG pictorial in a men's magazine to have had the effect of bringing about an "era of International Peace and Contentment" that you describe, such a pictorial would've had to appear in a magazine like Puritan or Prude rather than merely Playboy.

Laura San Giacomo Fakes - laurasangiacomo1 ULd LSG

[Palomine]

I don't recall us discussing this appearance, but it seems notable. I think that's Liam Neeson beneath her, surely  enjoying the feeling of her soft and heavy udders being dragged across his chest. I could be wrong about Liam tho... (not the enjoying part, but about the ID) since I haven't IMDBd this. Can't quite see a nipple there, but my mind plays tricks on me (i.e.: Fox Mulder's "I Want to Believe") so that I almost think that I do.

800px-Laura_San_Giacomo_-_Under_Suspicion ULd LSG

Added later: a slightly tweaked crop of the pic jim posted after this, in which it seems fairly certain that LSG's nipple is somewhat visible can be seen here: http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=76433.0;attach=453209 ...embedded image from another post.

[jimmarg]

  HOLY (as they say) CRAP! Considering the hours I've spent searching for any and all pics of LSG, it's kind of shocking I haven't seen that before. Not only is that the most Lauraboob on record, it's side and underboob! It's been years since I've seen the film (that must be Neesom, her only love interest, if memory serves), but needless to say I'll be watching again soon, with my finger posed on the freeze-frame. The technological task before us now is for someone to combine that tit-segment with the top-half from the bra shot in "The Stand," then get T_Man to magically dissolve whatever shielding top remains, and then my undying, unwavering faith that we will some day see Laura's boob(s) will not have been in vain! (I wipe away a tear.)

Pal adds: here's a murky, lowrez version of the scene: http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=316282680 ...though I see that this movie was released on both DVD and I think Bluray too, and (as jim pointed out to me earlier) it's possible that the European release might have been a bit racier than the U.S. one, so some hunting is in order.

[jimmarg]

Laura's nipple says hello. (I'm not yet ready to say I can die a happy man, but I'm a little closer.)

[Palomine]

Laura's nipple says hello. (I'm not yet ready to say I can die a happy man, but I'm a little closer.)

Though it's probably the most uncovered pic of LSG we've seen to date, I'm thinking that what seems like her nipple in that shot is actually an image compression artifact. I cropped from your frame and posted it in the OTF areola thread, where gonZo kindly did a bit of enhancement http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,76433.msg10342979.html#msg10342979 resulting in this:



...and to my eye, what seemed like nipple and areola on first inspection now looks a lot more like just a blocky group of pixels having more to do with compression artifacts than with tender delicious bits of womanflesh. Even if we were to assume the artifact is covering or contributed to by her nipple, it would seem to be in the wrong place (pointing too far south and outward, even for the softest and most malleable of breasts being dragged up against his chest). I could be wrong of course, but that's my current impression.

Regardless, LSG is still among my fave mainstream ladies. Attached is another still from Under Suspicion. She's fully clothed in it, but with a face and figure like hers, she still pushes all the necessary buttons.

ouPEmO LSG 1991 Under Suspicion (maybe Ital release) ULd LSG

[jimmarg]

  I really do appreciate the efforts of Palomine and all others in determining authenticity, etc., BUT just for future notice to all parties concerned: The next time there seems to be a sighting of a LSG nipple or (oh, God, pleeeze!) an actual naked boob shot - preferably circa 2000, when her talents were at their peak(s) - PLEASE GIVE ME MORE THAN JUST 24 HOURS TO REVEL IN MY EROTIC FANTASYLAND, before telling us it's a computer whatsit or a head fake. Would it kill you to wait 2 or 3 days before busting my bubble? (Anyway you look at it, that's still a lot more of Laura's honest-to-god tit-flesh than I've seen before, so it's not like I'm all that bummed. I wasn't expecting to ever get that close to a nipple shot!)  

[Palomine]

I really do appreciate the efforts of Palomine and all others in determining authenticity, etc., BUT just for future notice to all parties concerned: The next time there seems to be a sighting of a LSG nipple or (oh, God, pleeeze!) an actual naked boob shot - preferably circa 2000, when her talents were at their peak(s) - PLEASE GIVE ME MORE THAN JUST 24 HOURS TO REVEL IN MY EROTIC FANTASYLAND, before telling us it's a computer whatsit or a head fake. Would it kill you to wait 2 or 3 days before busting my bubble? (Anyway you look at it, that's still a lot more of Laura's honest-to-god tit-flesh than I've seen before, so it's not like I'm all that bummed. I wasn't expecting to ever get that close to a nipple shot!)  

Admittedly, we do get carried away with the CSI thing sometimes.

I'd suppose that Jim or someone here must have posted this one before, impressive as it is. The size and hang is almost breathaking, and that's before you try to imagine her there without the bra.

lBW6Bee ULd GF LSG

[Dr_Fashizzle]

I really do appreciate the efforts of Palomine and all others in determining authenticity, etc., BUT just for future notice to all parties concerned: The next time there seems to be a sighting of a LSG nipple or (oh, God, pleeeze!) an actual naked boob shot - preferably circa 2000, when her talents were at their peak(s) - PLEASE GIVE ME MORE THAN JUST 24 HOURS TO REVEL IN MY EROTIC FANTASYLAND, before telling us it's a computer whatsit or a head fake. Would it kill you to wait 2 or 3 days before busting my bubble? (Anyway you look at it, that's still a lot more of Laura's honest-to-god tit-flesh than I've seen before, so it's not like I'm all that bummed. I wasn't expecting to ever get that close to a nipple shot!)  

For the record, I spent several hours finding the cleanest bluray copy I could find and determined it was an artifact. But I didn't let on.

This however, is not a glitch (posted before, perhaps)

"01 Jan 1995 --- THE ACTRESS LAURA SAN GIACOMO"

[jimmarg]

For the record, I spent several hours finding the cleanest bluray copy I could find and determined it was an artifact. But I didn't let on.

This however, is not a glitch (posted before, perhaps)

"01 Jan 1995 --- THE ACTRESS LAURA SAN GIACOMO"

As for your first point, thanks, doc! You proved a true practitioner of the doctor's creed ("First, do no harm..."). Like I told Palomine, every time some little old lady sees the face of the virgin Mary in a taco shell you don't have to call in the lab techies to prove her wrong! My belief that I will someday see LSG's unfettered boob and nipple is unshaken!

Second point: Thanks again, and Wow! I believe I've seen that glamour photo before, but hadn't really looked closely. The gauzy material of the top of her dress is pretty teasing/revealing. I found another shot from the same session where the curvature and cleavage between tits is neatly defined; her right arm seems to be pressuring nicely towards the left. Now if only the photographer had moved the action a little further south! And remember, these were taken in '95, several years before Laura had her mid-life growth spurt (due to a miscarriage, or whatever), so this is just a hint of what was to come.

[jimmarg]

I'm just trying to make sure attention is paid where attention should be paid. Look at the expansive curvature and you can imagine the full-breadth of that impressive breast. Whatever undergarment she has on, if any, it sure isn't one of those Victoria's Secret push-'em-up specials. I suspect those puppies are swinging free. (My heart rate doubles.)