Women of Buffy the Vampire Slayer

Catch22 · « **Reply #75 on:** December 16, 2004, 12:08:22 AM »

Not to diminish any of these excellent manipulations, but...

Still no Anya*? She is now conspicuous by her absence, and that's Aud!

*Thanks for the save Arc_Tangent. How soon we forget - or at least I do.

MunchWolf · « **Reply #76 on:** December 16, 2004, 01:51:16 AM »

fine .. here you go ...

-Munch "go ahead .. make me change my avatar" Wolf

MunchWolf · « **Reply #77 on:** December 16, 2004, 01:59:21 AM »

FYI, I did a google image search on Anya, and hit the motherlode of Buffy pics at a czeck site:

http://hellmouth.mysteria.cz/anya/galanya.htm
http://hellmouth.mysteria.cz/buffy/galbuffy.htm
http://hellmouth.mysteria.cz/willow/galwillow.htm
http://hellmouth.mysteria.cz/tara/galtara.htm

-Munch "I extrapolated the last three .. couldn't find a dru, dawn, or cordelia gallery there though" Wolf

Catch22 · « **Reply #78 on:** December 16, 2004, 02:14:45 AM »

Well Munch! aren't you the sly one. Your pm mentioned an Anya pic. You conveinently left out the part that it was your work.

It just goes to show you, the sqeaky wheel gets the grease.
I can speak with the best of 'em.

Amy · « **Reply #79 on:** December 16, 2004, 04:49:44 AM »

No Fakes Of The Fakes? I mean well, really these Buffy Girls are all the time took and 'made naked' (in that fake but real looking way) alot. Rather alot, I know of galleries of Just Anya alone of some 677 so images, just makes me pnder how coem this is not a flavor no one much cares for here?

For sure the artists and fans here know of these sites and galleries yes? After all, both are artists who create fakes. I just do not understand how come alot more of these girls do not end up at least topless, as is, breasts are good yeah, but if you do not show the bareness off, what's the true point really?

I am just shocked at some 677 images of 'Anya' topless at least, and not a one of those have been 'helped' in the classic BEA way.

~Amy

MunchWolf · « **Reply #80 on:** December 16, 2004, 10:48:52 AM »

Quote:

Well Munch! aren't you the sly one. Your pm mentioned an Anya pic. You conveinently left out the part that it was your work.

Well, I figured it was about time that there was an anya pic too .. and what better way than to make it myself (been a while since I morphed something) ... made it on the fly .. and in retrospect I should have spent more time on it as there are lots of little errors that are bugging me ..

-Munch "oilcan" Wolf

Arc · « **Reply #81 on:** December 16, 2004, 05:42:30 PM »

Oil can what?

Brothers and sisters, lay a firm grasp on Faith and exercise it every day.

ElmerFudd · « **Reply #82 on:** December 16, 2004, 06:22:21 PM »

Actually, there's even more Buffy character pics at this site (it's where Munch's Pics came from, I think):

http://www.buffy-angel.org/

MunchWolf · « **Reply #83 on:** December 17, 2004, 12:34:01 AM »

Sweet .. he also has
http://hellmouth.mysteria.cz/cordelie/galcordelie.htm

couldn't figure out how to get pics from the main page though

ooooh ... fred too
http://hellmouth.mysteria.cz/fred/galfred.htm

oh .. and I forgot
http://hellmouth.mysteria.cz/faith/galfaith.htm

-Munch "dang .. too many pics to choose from to morph" Wolf

Arc · « **Reply #84 on:** December 17, 2004, 06:21:27 PM »

And now, for all the Comfortadors out there...
Restless Joyce, day 1 of 2.

GALVATRON · « **Reply #85 on:** December 17, 2004, 08:08:56 PM »

bwwaaaahhh!

Gotta be mine
'Cause you're so fine
I like your style
It makes me wild
You take it to me good
Yeah, like you know you should
You get me on my knees
But please, baby, please

Listen
She looks so great
Everytime I see her face
She put me in a state
A state of shock!!

Angelus · « **Reply #86 on:** December 17, 2004, 08:43:29 PM »

Galvatron:

Gwen Raiden. AWESOME. You rock.

GALVATRON · « **Reply #88 on:** December 18, 2004, 03:23:22 PM »

bwaaaahhh!

Buffy, spilling out in a field of flowers.

Arc · « **Reply #89 on:** December 18, 2004, 07:04:50 PM »

Damn, Galvatron!

Here's Restless Joyce, day 2 of 2.

Re: Women of ANGEL