[doggo]

 

Quote:
She's not lesbian, trust me on this one.

Why is it that whenever anyone says "trust me", I immediately start thinking of all the reasons why I shouldn't?

[DEEDEEDELUXX]

 Dusty talked about what she does now on a talk show in L.A, i dought she would if she did'nt care that people new, and no she is'nt a lesbian, she was married and never once mentiond it to me in all the talks we had that she liked girls, enough said.  Dee dee

[Metaluna_Carnivore]

Good to hear she's doing fine and well post retirement.

[freebirdy]

She was and still is, a true class act in every sense. Long hair, short hair it just doesn't matter. This girl could perform and had some of the best layouts Score ever produced. The marine outfit is still one of my favorites all-time. You couldn't help, but stand at "attention" for that one!

[melonie_charm]

Is it just me, or does freebirdy's 'testament' to Dusty sound more than a bit like industry promo ?

Now let's see, while we're being a tiny bit suspicious, which 'mainstream huge boob' marketer might have a vested interest in promoting Busty Dusty's material ?

PS Hi Elliot.  For what it's worth, I agree completely with your personal comments about Dusty and your statement regarding her right to at least some reasonable amount of post-retirement privacy.

[sheber]

What's the point?









sheb "?" er

[dyon]

Why did she choose to don't make hardcore?

[Bambi_Blaze]

 

Quote:
Is it just me, or does freebirdy's 'testament' to Dusty sound more than a bit like industry promo ?

Not to me....but does it really matter?

There are big tit fans, big tit webmasters, big tit marketers, etc....here at the BEA.  It's open to everyone.

[melonie_charm]

Quote:
Not to me....but does it really matter?

There are big tit fans, big tit webmasters, big tit marketers, etc....here at the BEA. It's open to everyone.

You're absolutely correct.  Theoretically it shouldn't matter at all.  Everyone is entitled to hold and express their own opinion.

However, IMHO, everyone else should also be entitled to know, at least to some degree, from what standpoint that posted opinion is coming.  For example, Elliot James of SCORE was quick to respond to a (now deleted) post made by another BEA member which was somewhat critical of Crystal Gunns.  Elliot again chose to respond to posts made by other BEA members in this thread which are somewhat critical of Busty Dusty.  However, in other recent threads which were critical of other models i.e. Tawny Peaks or particularly Echo Valley, Elliot chose not to offer comment.  Since most BEA readers are aware of Elliot's affiliation with Score magazine, and are also intelligent enough to connect the dots in regard to Score magazine's vested business interests in Crystal Gunns and Busty Dusty Stash, those BEA readers can take those vested business interests into proper consideration when reading Elliot's comments.  Please understand that I am in no way criticizing Elliot, or the fact that he has chosen to post in one thread but not in another thread, but merely pointing out that most BEA readers understand who Elliot is and how the content/tone of his posts might be less than totally objective due to underlying vested interests.

In the case of 'freebirdy', however, there is no openly stated industry affiliation as there is in Elliot's case.    However, the timing of 'freebirdy's arrival here at BEA, the tone/content of virtually all of 'freebirdy's posts, and the 'expert knowledge' 'freebirdy' has purportedly shared in some posts, would tend to indicate to me that 'freebirdy' is something other than the simple huge boob fan and lurker he professes to be.

Does it matter whether 'freebirdy' is a simple huge boob fan versus someone with industry connections who may very well have vested interests behind his comments/aspersions ?  
I suppose the answer to that depends on whether or not you are the target of 'freebirdy's aspersions, and whether or not BEA readers are potentially aware that vested business interests might exist when they read and evaluate 'freebirdy's comments.

[Bambi_Blaze]

Melonie, I may not have boobs as big as yours, but I do have a brain.  I honestly can't help but feel you have an axe to grind with a lot of contributors at the BEA and the big boob business in general.

Is it really necessary?  Shouldn't  you move on after your announced retirement, and let the viewers enjoy the BEA topics without all the paranoia and innuendos that you consistently interject in the threads relating to other models?

Your redundancy is getting 'old', and it will be interesting to see if yet another thread about another model will be locked once again. (Speaking of hidden agendas!)

[ggk]

 

Quote:
 Please understand that I am in no way criticizing Elliot

Your quote comes off as saying he only speaks up for Busty Dusty because of a financial interest.  Maybe he does not know Tawny Peaks or Echo Valley well enough to comment on them. Maybe he chose not to get into those threads. I can think of several reasons why he may post on one subject and not another, that has nothing to do with money.  I don't believe Elliot is speaking about Dusty because of money, and unless you are sure, you might want to keep that belief under your hat. I say this because I don't think you are aware of the tone of your posts and I personally don't like to see you or anyone else here get cursed out.

[melonie_charm]

Quote:
Your quote comes off as saying he only speaks up for Busty Dusty because of a financial interest

I specifically tried to avoid that incorrect impression.  All I was trying to say is that, because of Elliot's openly announced industry affiliation, most BEA readers were provided with an accurate frame of reference with which to read and evaluate Elliot's comments.  My real point actually had very little to do with Elliot, but rather with the possibility of other persons with industry affiliations posting here in the guise of supposedly objective fans with no vested business interest.

Quote:
Shouldn't you move on after your announced retirement, and let the viewers enjoy the BEA topics without all the paranoia and innuendos that you consistently interject in the threads relating to other models?

Your redundancy is getting 'old', and it will be interesting to see if yet another thread about another model will be locked once again. (Speaking of hidden agendas!)

Or put another way, I should move on and let BEA members enjoy particular topics and points of view which are sanctioned by the 'mainstream huge boobs' marketers, with few if any BEA members pointing out that these topics and points of view might not be altogether objective or complete, or that additional facts might exist which are contrary and unwelcome ?

As to deleted threads, I would have no objection whatsoever if the deleted thread in question was resurrected in its entirety.  IMHO the deletion of that thread was far more advantageous to others than it was to me.

To get right to the underlying issue, IMHO the 'mainstream huge boobs' media is in many ways analogous to the 'mainstream news media'.  For the New York Times there is a PhotoClubs.  For CBS News there is a Score magazine. For the Washington Post there is a Universal Entertainment/Flashdancers Group.  For years these mainstream players co-operated with each other and exerted a large degree of control over who and what was or was not promoted in their media.  However, in the mainstream news media's case, 'bloggers' began to come forth with behind the scenes info regarding the vested interests of the mainstream players, indications that certain persons/news were being deliberately repressed by mainstream players etc.  To continue the analogy I suppose that Ample1 and myself and a few others are analogous to the bloggers.  The next question of course is if the mainstream players in the huge boobs industry will be able to continue as always, versus the possible emergence of a huge boobs industry equivalent of Fox News.      

 

[Dick_Woods]

So now we are critizing people for what threads they decide to post in?.....*Maybe* , like me, Elliott posts only when he feels he has something valuable to add to a conversation, or a debate. As far as anyone not rushing to Tawney's defense...people that felt she needed to be defended did, and those who felt she should have taken her lumps, stated so...and I don't recall anyone being critical of Echo Valley, If I had seen that I certainly would have spoken out, as she is near and dear to mine, and my wife's hearts...the only people I saw getting hammered in *that* thread were the SCOREgroup, for not having hired her. I also voiced my suprise and dissapointment in that. I would never presume to tell anyone who to hire as a model though, the same goes for Cleavage magazine, who will no doubt use their own criteria to hire models...There are MANY reasons people do not make a business connection...sometimes it's just bad timing...sometimes it's a difference in philosophy...in Echo's case, it certainly isn't her looks, because anyone this side of Richard Simmons can see how gorgeous she is. I am sure everyone here is at least in agreement on that point.

Melonie...not everything is a conspiracy...Jesus...he just made a couple of posts...that's all...no underlying plot...no agenda...just a couple of posts...we should hire you at our local airports, because if you can 'connect these dots'...the Taliban wouldn't stand a chance against your keen eye.

[melonie_charm]

Quote:
Melonie...not everything is a conspiracy...Jesus...he just made a couple of posts...that's all...no underlying plot...no agenda.

I would be much more accepting of that possibility if, for example, you could tell us with total honesty that you yourself do not have any vested interest whatsoever in remaining in the good graces of the Flashdancers Group.

[Bambi_Blaze]

Quote:
 The next question of course is if the mainstream players in the huge boobs industry will be able to continue as always, versus the possible emergence of a huge boobs industry equivalent of Fox News.  

Would this equivalency by any chance be Cleavage Magazine which 'perhaps' you Melonie might have a vested interest in?