[Dick_Woods]

Neither my wife, nor myself have been to Flashdancers, NY Dolls, or Private Eyes in over a year...so no, we have no vested interest, nor have we ever had any business realtionship with them...we will further say that we make no money in any form of the adult entertainment industry...we post pictures for free, and are in ownership of NOTHING that has any connection to the adult industry...we dont even have a website.

On another note..speaking only for myself...and given our present relationship...if this thread's tittle read 'Where is Melonie Charm?' ...and people were making assumptions (many I knew to be wrong) about your personal life, I would have made the same exact post I had originally made about Dusty's desire for privacy for you...

[Faulkner]

Melonie,

I don't see why you would think that Elliot (or SCORE) would have more of a vested interest in Crystal Gunns or Busty Dusty than Tawny Peaks. While Crystal may be regularly featured in their magazine, and it's true that SCORE does produce the Busty Dusty Stash, it's also true that the SCORE Group launched (relatively recently) www.TawnyPeaks.com.

I'm trying to see your point of view. What specifically do you think would be either Elliot's or SCORE's motivation for defending one model for whom they own/manage a site and not the other?


My take on it was more that he had particular knowledge of and/or reason to take exception to the things being said rather than that he was trying to protect thier business interests. It's hard for me to see how much business could be either generated or lost from a single, very narrowly-focused bulletin board (versus traditional internet marketing, etc.).

Please take no affront from this; I am seriously interested  to hear what you have to say...

[RB]

You know what I find annoying about all of this?

Here are two amazing women among us - Bambi and Melonie - they take part, they offer opinions, and they get stuck in to the debates. There's others too - like Dee Dee Delux.

Recently, I've sensed some mega hostility against Melonie, and I've also seen Bambi take her fair share of the nasty comments in some message threads - often, it's totally unwarranted and downright rude.

For guys who go on about how amazing big tits are, and how much we idolise these incredible women, some people just can't help but be nasty.

Come on guys, get with it.

Respect the breasts.

[ggk]

Who here is being nasty?  When people speak their minds, there will be disagreement.  Do you really want us to blindly agree with someone because they have big boobs? Is that really respecting someone? I don't think so.

[TheRover]

Yeah, but it's freebirdy's fault...after all, it was his "expertise" (I guess it was because he remembered Dusty's pictorial in a Marine outfit) that tipped off someone as to his alleged "ties" to the industry.

So from now on, no more "expertise" from lurkers or new members.  Acceptable questions from new members to prove you have no such "expertise":
1) Are Tawny Peaks and Pandora Peaks sisters?
2) So, what's all the hoopla about this Chelsea Charms lady anyway?
3) A model ID request...with an attached pic of Dolly Parton.

If we could just join hands...

[Elliot James]

Sorry, Mel, you're wrong that my last two posts could have been based on business interests. Want to try for what's behind door number 2? The post about Dusty was based on very happy memories of a great woman I will never see again. My post about Crystal was a defense against a load of crap about her.

[melonie_charm]

Quote:
Sorry, Mel, you're wrong that my last two posts could have been based on business interests. Want to try for what's behind door number 2? The post about Dusty was based on very happy memories of a great woman I will never see again. My post about Crystal was a defense against a load of crap about her.

To Elliot - Again, I tried to very clearly state that I made reference to your posts only as an example of the source being a publicly acknowledged industry figure, and left it up to BEA readers to evaluate for themselves whether or not any vested interest might underlie your comments knowing that you are in fact an industry figure ...

"All I was trying to say is that, because of Elliot's openly announced industry affiliation, most BEA readers were provided with an accurate frame of reference with which to read and evaluate Elliot's comments. My real point actually had very little to do with Elliot, but rather with the possibility of other persons with industry affiliations posting here in the guise of supposedly objective fans with no vested business interest"

To Dick - Fair enough !

To Faulkner - consider the possibility that any widespread implication that a particular model was/is a lesbian, an issue raised by another BEA member early in this thread (and almost immediately followed by a response from Elliot James to the contrary), might reduce the potential saleability of that model's material to some male customers, thus potentially reducing the income of those parties now in control of said model's material.

To Bambi - for the record I have no vested business interest whatsoever in Cleavage Magazine.  For complete accuracy I have recently written a column and submitted it to them, which they are free to accept or reject.  Also, I have met and worked with Rhiannon and Anton, the publishers of Cleavage Magazine, but then again I have also met and worked with Elliot, the editor of Score magazine, and many other people in the industry.  I do occasionally speak with Rhiannon on a somewhat personal basis, but I actually speak to other huge boob girls much more frequently.  I won't inquire further about any possibility that your own future business interests might contribute to your own comments being less than objective, because you have stated/implied that you have been approached by a 'mainstream huge boob' marketer and you have refused to add further details in another thread.

to ggk - I don't think so either, and never expected (or wanted) that my credibility would be dependent on my breast size.

To TheRover - I'm glad that I finally was able to get through to someone !

To all BEA readers - it is not my wish to muddy the waters here or to cause problems.  However, it is also not my wish to see myself or other models selectively attacked (particularly when it occurs in absentia) or selectively defended for that matter.  But it is correctly pointed out that my name is not at the top of this thread either, and that further commentary is likely to cause more harm than good, so I'll trust that you hold a grain of healthy skepticism when you see such selective attacks and defenses in the future.

[Bambi_Blaze]

 

Quote:
I won't inquire further about any possibility that your own future business interests might contribute to your own comments being less than objective, because you have stated/implied that you have been approached by a 'mainstream huge boob' marketer and you have refused to add further details in another thread.

Melonie I can assure you that any comments I've made to you have been in direct relation to my perception of statements you've made in a number of threads relating to other models.

I don't cross the isle for no one nor any  potential business opportunity.

I am my own woman and I stand on my own two feet -- no sucking up here.

[solvegas]

-no sucking up here   -
Uhmmm.... I distintly remember seeing you sucking some dick in a video at your site  . Sorry Bambi , I couldn't resist  .
Plese forgive me , I'm a old Sailor and sometimes I just can't help myself . On a serious note , Melonie , I highly respect your willingness to continue to express your opinion . I don't always agree and some people IMO have been too harsh to you , but at least you are still plugging away . And to everybody out there , by all means let's put our $0.02 out there , but let's be civil . Just because we disagree does not mean we should be abusive . We don't need to lock out any more threads .

[doggo]

Quote:
To Faulkner - consider the possibility that any widespread implication that a particular model was/is a lesbian, an issue raised by another BEA member early in this thread (and almost immediately followed by a response from Elliot James to the contrary), might reduce the potential saleability of that model's material to some male customers, thus potentially reducing the income of those parties now in control of said model's material.

Any suggestion that a particular model is or has been a lesbian has a polarising effect. For every fan who might be turned off by such a suggestion there is likely to be another who is likely to find it a fascinating notion - as long as he or she is invited to watch.

It's probably no big deal, given that unsuspectedly large numbers of women are at the very least bi-curious. Who or what a woman finds it more or less satisfying to **82** with is no one's business but her own. Nevertheless, Score Group were surprisingly prompt in issuing a stern denial. As if it really mattered to anyone.

[Tulip]

Dear Melonie,
I heard that she did get some sort of complications when she made the reduction. is it true?
If the sking is too thin to heal, how doctors overcome this?

[Hentaibee]

what the *BEEP* is happening here???

since when is it forbidden to know some facts n trivia about big boob models???

[Faulkner]

Melonie,

In response to my last post, you said:

Quote:
To Faulkner - consider the possibility that any widespread implication that a particular model was/is a lesbian, an issue raised by another BEA member early in this thread (and almost immediately followed by a response from Elliot James to the contrary), might reduce the potential saleability of that model's material to some male customers, thus potentially reducing the income of those parties now in control of said model's material.

OK; I'll take it into consideration. But you didn't address my question (about a perceived double-standard), which was...


I don't see why you would think that Elliot (or SCORE) would have more of a vested interest in Crystal Gunns or Busty Dusty than Tawny Peaks. While Crystal may be regularly featured in their magazine, and it's true that SCORE does produce the Busty Dusty Stash, it's also true that the SCORE Group launched (relatively recently) www.Tawny-Peaks.com.

I'm trying to see your point of view. What specifically do you think would be either Elliot's or SCORE's motivation for defending one model for whom they own/manage a site and not the other?

[Dick_Woods]

Well...before we go on at all...let me ask a question...

What the hell does any of this have to do with Busty Dusty?

[Bambi_Blaze]

 

Quote:
Uhmmm.... I distintly remember seeing you sucking some dick in a video at your site . Sorry Bambi , I couldn't resist .

LOL Solvegas!  Sucking cock is the exception to my "sucking-up" rule baby!