[Jubei]

If you like her, this Morrigan cos-player should be up everyone's alley.

[AgentDee]

Quote:
Jubei said:
If you like her, this Morrigan cos-player should be up everyone's alley.

Damn!

[brakblake]

Quote:
Jubei said:
If you like her, this Morrigan cos-player should be up everyone's alley.

......yes.....yes i do ^_^

[roap]

Quote:
GALVATRON said:
Which goes to prove that most geeks simply are not very good looking. If they were good looking, they wouldn't have enough spare time to cultivate their geekyness because they'd be busy scoring.

In my experience, it's worse than that: even if you do find a pretty geek, she probably has close to zero relationship skills and has a bad attitude about sexuality.

[Palomine]

Quote:
roap said:

Quote:
GALVATRON said:
Which goes to prove that most geeks simply are not very good looking. If they were good looking, they wouldn't have enough spare time to cultivate their geekyness because they'd be busy scoring.

In my experience, it's worse than that: even if you do find a pretty geek, she probably has close to zero relationship skills and has a bad attitude about sexuality.

I respectfully disagree with BOTH statements based on my own personal experience.  

[roap]

Quote:
Palomine said:
I respectfully disagree with BOTH statements based on my own personal experience.

CollegeProwler.com ranks the attractiveness of girls at various universities.  It's no surprise that the geeky schools like MIT are at the bottom of the list.

http://collegeprowler.com/rankings/girls/

[brakblake]

Quote:
Palomine said:

Quote:
roap said:

Quote:
GALVATRON said:
Which goes to prove that most geeks simply are not very good looking. If they were good looking, they wouldn't have enough spare time to cultivate their geekyness because they'd be busy scoring.

In my experience, it's worse than that: even if you do find a pretty geek, she probably has close to zero relationship skills and has a bad attitude about sexuality.

I respectfully disagree with BOTH statements based on my own personal experience.  

Do go on Galvatron!!!

[robclassact]

Quote:
Palomine said:

Quote:
roap said:

Quote:
GALVATRON said:
Which goes to prove that most geeks simply are not very good looking. If they were good looking, they wouldn't have enough spare time to cultivate their geekyness because they'd be busy scoring.

In my experience, it's worse than that: even if you do find a pretty geek, she probably has close to zero relationship skills and has a bad attitude about sexuality.

I respectfully disagree with BOTH statements based on my own personal experience.  

Thanks Pal. I'll totally back you up in disagreement, and I've even got a counter-argument based on my personal experience.

My fiancee (the better half our little "geek pair"), didn't necessarily have a bad attitude about relationships or sexuality, but did have a low tolerance for shallowness. She simply was put off by guys who tried to impress her with macho attitudes, smooth talking, and general douchebagginess. She generally was too smart to be impressed by that bullshit.

Cute geeks are put off by social drama and shallow relationships. As far as the "bad attitude about sexuality," I'll just say that that's definitely not true.  

Also, I cringe when I think of the personalities of girls who do spend all their spare time scoring.

[GALVATRON]

bwaaahhhh!

This is ridiculous. I'll try this again. MOST geeky people are not cute. MOST, as in a significant MAJORITY.
Just because you may come across a cute geek, or do a web search for "cute geeks" and find some, does not mean that  geeks as a whole are generally attractive.
If you believe that geeks as a whole are generally attractive then:
A. You have a different standard of beauty than the norm.
B. You define "geek" differently than the norm.
C. You are repressing years of geek-based ridicule and torment and are now trying to make a stand for your homely brethren by blatantly ignoring the world around you.
D. You believe that crap your mom told you about real beauty being on the inside.
E. Some combination of A, B, C and D.
F. You live in Bizzaro World.

[Palomine]

Quote:
roap said:

Quote:
Palomine said:
I respectfully disagree with BOTH statements based on my own personal experience.

CollegeProwler.com ranks the attractiveness of girls at various universities.  It's no surprise that the geeky schools like MIT are at the bottom of the list.

http://collegeprowler.com/rankings/girls/

By your 'logic' Britney Spears is the most talented performer/musician on the planet, simply because the charts place her at #1 from time to time. I.e.: don't believe everything that you read, or cliches based merely on sitcom stereotypes. I've BEEN to MIT... and seen in a brief visit literally dozens of gals most guys would give their left nut to know better. Just because they're not all blonde implanted cheerleader/spokesmodel wannabes doesn't mean some of them aren't sexy as hell.

Again: I'm speaking from personal, actual experience instead of just pointing to 'collegeprowler' rankings which IMO, bear even less relationship to reality than Top 40 charts. But feel free to ignore me... you just go ahead and denegrate people you don't know or know anything about... whatever floats your boat.

[GALVATRON]

Quote:
Palomine said:

Britney Spears is the most talented performer/musician on the planet

bwaaahhh!

Yes, she is.

[Palomine]

Quote:
GALVATRON said:

Quote:
Palomine said:

Quote:
roap said:

Quote:
Palomine said:
I respectfully disagree with BOTH statements based on my own personal experience.

CollegeProwler.com ranks the attractiveness of girls at various universities.  It's no surprise that the geeky schools like MIT are at the bottom of the list.

http://collegeprowler.com/rankings/girls/

By your 'logic' Britney Spears is the most talented performer/musician on the planet

bwaaahhh!

Yes, she is.

Of course, I KNEW you were going to say that, which is why I used Ms. Spears as my example!  

[roap]

Quote:
Palomine said:
Again: I'm speaking from personal, actual experience instead of just pointing to 'collegeprowler' rankings which IMO, bear even less relationship to reality than Top 40 charts. But feel free to ignore me... you just go ahead and denegrate people you don't know or know anything about... whatever floats your boat.

I went to grad school at one of the schools on the bottom of collegeprowler's list.  So, I too am speaking from personal experience.

Do you have statistics that contradict collegeprowler's?

[mofoapoo]

Quote:

Do you have statistics that contradict collegeprowler's?

I do!

It's a website.  on the internet.  it's not a legitimate source.

Also, this is a discussion on what people find hot.  There is no universal with opinions.  You might find girls hot that I find generic and boring.  I might find girls hot that you think aren't.

I win.

[GALVATRON]

Quote:
mofoapoo said:

Quote:

Do you have statistics that contradict collegeprowler's?

I do!

It's a website.  on the internet.  it's not a legitimate source.

Also, this is a discussion on what people find hot.  There is no universal with opinions.  You might find girls hot that I find generic and boring.  I might find girls hot that you think aren't.

I win.

bwaaaaahh!

You don't win. You just selected option "A" on my list of reasons why you are wrong.
Weirdo! Now that you know where you have erred...conform. Conform I say!