[DJPFC]

Ashley Pridgen, though I'm doubt she'd go topless.

Yeah, that's a negatory.  She's very nice, though.

[Ooze3d]

Is this possible DJ? (from the Model ID section)

[robclassact]

Ashley Pridgen, though I'm doubt she'd go topless.

I came across her pics a while ago but only knew her as "Ashley." Yeah, she's gorgeous (and a very talented artist) but I can't imagine she'd ever be a possibility.

[ChrisR1]

SexyVenera - This chick was absolutely made for Pinup Glam!

[boobsterama]

SexyVenera - This chick was absolutely made for Pinup Glam!

We have another for SexyVenera!

[Geeve]

This model Robyn Alexandra sometimes has her as Greenwood too.  Second vote goes to Marie Claude Bourbonais.

[jtg987]

venera I pray that this happens

Mod edit: while I'm not exactly praying, such an event would be more than just pleasant. If not Sexy Venera then Sweet Lena. Both of these gals are simply at the TOP of the slim'n'stacked genre. -Pal

[MaxBigfoot]

I would love to see Sexy Venera as well.  Not only because she's got an awesome body, but for the chance to see that body in great pictures, not blurry screencaps and such.

[TWoods]

Mod edit: please be sure that what you want to post is OK per the site rules... if it's NOT please don't post it/about it. Thanks.

[030687]

Mod edit: and when someone else posts a violation, you quoting it simply just doubles the potential liability... you should know better because you were moderated before about this exact subject. So you quoting it counts as a violation of your own (you're up to three now). So PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: re-read the rules and participate WITHIN them so the BEA can stay out of legal trouble. Thanks.

[TWoods]

Well I didn't post any pictures, per the rules as I saw written.  There's actually a whole thread on the subject of this girl where her name even appears in the subject line and throughout the conversation.  Based on that I figured it was fine to merely post her name in this thread in response to the request for nominations.

Rule: "All photos of and information about..."

I didn't provide any photos or information.

Pal replies: 'information' includes the sort of non-picture thing you posted... rather than trying to 'work around' the Owner's rules, why not just abide by them in letter AND spirit and HELP the BEA Forum stay online, rather than make things more difficult? If you see some other thread or post that violates one of the Owner's rules, please just drop a note to any moderator and we'll take care of it and thank you for the help... all we want to do is keep this place safe for our users per the policies that the Owner has deemed necessary. Thanks. -Pal

[DJPFC]

Since I know her personally, I should get her to come in here and start up her own account and post herself and some photos of herself and claim all copyrights on those photos.  Then we can all sit back and watch the fireworks as the mods heads all explode as they try to come to grips with the blatantly obvious contradictions in the "rules" that they never seem to acknowledge, and have probably never even considered before.  

It would be funny to see them ban her and delete her posts because of the rules about her... that were started by her.  And since the rules can never be changed once written, then it becomes the ultimate paradox.

[solvegas]

DJPFC, you are mistaken about the rules have never been changed. They have been amended and sometimes new ones placed but they have been changed. If CPG wishes to come along I don't think Palomine, Gonzo or Cheviot are as anal as you imply and I'm sure the owner can rescind that rule. I hope I'm not being naive in that respect. I do want to say that I'm a big fan of yours and I truly appreciate you introducing the awe inspiring ladies that has been our great fortune to see and I really, really envy/hate you because you personally know them. 

[gonZo]

Since I know her personally, I should get her to come in here and start up her own account and post herself and some photos of herself and claim all copyrights on those photos.  Then we can all sit back and watch the fireworks as the mods heads all explode as they try to come to grips with the blatantly obvious contradictions in the "rules" that they never seem to acknowledge, and have probably never even considered before.  

It would be funny to see them ban her and delete her posts because of the rules about her... that were started by her.  And since the rules can never be changed once written, then it becomes the ultimate paradox.

The suggestion that we would ban her and delete her posts is ridiculous, since those selfsame posts would indicate that she had reconsidered her original request to prohibit her content on this board. If she ever wants to strike down the forum rule that was established at her request and for her protection, all she needs to do is drop us a note.

In the meantime, exaggerated speculation from someone who doesn't fully understand the situation doesn't benefit her or the forum.

Pal adds: I have to agree with everything gonZo said. We're huge fans of your stuff DJ, but I've no idea why you continue to go on about the rules 'never changing' when you know that's absolutely not true... they get some kind of edit every couple of months or so on average, as I've already illustrated for you before. If she wants to rescind her prior request, all she has to do is get in touch and say so... I've no doubt that the BEA Owner will be happy to have one less rule in his list and more importantly to have another model contributing to the forum. Until she makes such a request, the Owner has no choice but to abide by her prior/standing request: that nothing about her appears here. I don't know how you'd expect him to do anything else.

[solvegas]

Well, I just hope DJPFC will talk her into it and she becomes a forum member. I can't speak for the rest but I would be happier than a bear shitting in the woods.