[SwitcherX]

got an email today saying that Danuta Lato might have done hardcore in BUSEN EXTRA 2 (1987).  Anyone have it and can tell me for sure?

[Palomine]

 Yes, I believe so although some doubt remains. She was wearing a black wig as I recall. Argyle, who's memory is far better than mine, will know more. See attachment

[pedonbio]

Well, I'm no help, either. In addition to the black wig, she looks a few years older than her modelling days, and a few pounds heavier. But the face does look like her.

[bugmenot]

First of all, this is also a name of a magazine edition that she was in - http://www.yurmag.com/busen-extra_adult_magazine.htm.

She was also in edition #20 and in Pleasure 61.

Here are screenshots from all of the above.

If you read what the posts say, this was when she has just arrived to Germany, so maybe it's just the ugly black wig that makes her look fat and old...

Now, if you google her name, the term "Covergirl" and "Busen 2", maybe that's the adult movie she was in and you got confused with the magazine edition.

Here she is in the part of "Cover girl", but it doesn't say if it's from "Busen 2" or "Busen Extra 2", but if you compare this to last screenshot in the official page of Busen 2, I'd say it has to be "Busen 2". Don't you agree?

 Edit by mod: first, thanks for your informative post and welcome. However, I've had to edit your post due to a rule violation it contained... please re-read your user agreement so that you know what sorts of subjects the Owner of this site doesn't want contained in his forums... thanks.

I think most of us agree that the Busen #2 gal in the black wig IS Danuta, though I for one hardly consider her to look 'fat and old' in that material... we're all entitled to our opinions though. I've personally posted the same forum link that you did (containing the scans from Busen #2) some time ago as evidence of Danuta Lato's limited hardcore work. That's a great issue (for enthusiasts of healthy-looking women with natural breasts in hardcore photos).

BTW, anyone who's DL'd those Danuta scans will have noticed that two of the full-rez files seem to be unavailable: 83500_bvmr0845.jpg and 83526_bvmr0850.jpg specifically. If anyone happens to have the full-rez versions of these two files, I'm sure Danuta collectors like myself would appreciate them.  

[bugmenot]

Hmm, what did you edit exactly? What rule violation?

BTW, the girl in the poster for the "Busen 3" movie looks a little like her (without the wig). Any chance she also did that movie?

Edit/reply by Pal: any post/link/solicitation/suggestion/info regarding torrents or other means of distributing bulk quantities of pirated copyright material is prohibited as per your user agreement. That's all that I edited out of your post.

I don't know if that's her in #3.  

[bugmenot]

Oh. Can you at least delete the word "so" before "maybe" in that line, so it would make sense after the edit?

Edit by mod: Though no one gets graded on grammar here, I've done as you asked out of courtesy. Please be aware that there's only a small handful of moderators to deal with thousands of users and 100s of 1000s of posts, so time is tight.  

[bugmenot]

You can always just let us edit ourselves...

Thanks for the fix.

You CAN edit for yourself within the alloted time window, which is intentionally brief. After that, only mods can edit posts... this is in order to maintain some semblance of integrity to the threads... otherwise, folks would be editing their own posts (for a variety of reasons) indefinitely, rendering the progressive/conversational tone of threads null and void. Anyone who edits themselves to remove a rule violation BEFORE a mod finds it DOES NOT HAVE THE VIOLATION LOGGED IN THEIR UID FILE (caps for empasis to all readers, I'm not yelling).