Though I would suggest a photograph is objective, when we seek an opinion about a particular aspect, it becomes subjective, yet I cannot help but wonder if anyone would think that Beshine is not much larger in this 2017 photograph than she was 5 years ago. As people have pointed out, photographs can be deceiving when the camera is too close or a wide angle lens is used, however, this is not the case here; taken from video at a distance and cropped.
As per previous discussions, a mere 1/2" in diameter can result in a 3000+cc difference at Beshine's suggested size, using what I deem the most appropriate shape calculator, which would be one for a partially filled sphere, which, if you picture it with the top of the fluid being the area where the breast contacts the chest wall, would be far more accurate than using a sphere or dome. Still, it is subjective in that the breast is not a perfect sphere and I do not have a precise measurement on either projection nor diameter, yet, with a lack of anything definitive, it has been the best I can do.
But the question here is not a specific size, but if Beshine has continued to increase her size. I would suggest that photos indicate she has, but again, that is somewhat subjective. If you compare braless photos from each time period, taken at a distance to eliminate likelihood of camera/lens distortion, the gap between her breasts is far narrower and the tops of the breasts appear much higher; I would suggest each showing 3-4" expansion in each direction from early photos, and when viewed from the front, her breasts are not the same oval shape and seemingly splayed to the sides. Her width is essentially unchanged, and as with her lower aspect, likely held from in check by the internal bra, which is why we see expansion inward and upward, being the only avenues remaining.
I admit it is somewhat subjective when clothed because you cannot see that the cleavage is far closer together than it used to be and even her posture in a particular picture may suggest a higher or lower breast height, however, viewing any picture set or video from the era in question and comparing it to today, without wishful thinking, but just trying to be unbiased and objective, the differences, no matter how subtle or overt you may find them, seem quite clear. And there are many other signs that changes have been taking place when you study a video; balance, agility, and stamina have all apparently decreased. As I have pointed out before, there is a reason why high heels, once a staple in photoshoots, have disappeared entirely for quite some time.