[seanster]

Hey, nice comparison. Maybe Chloe is a secret Viz fan, eh? Her Apache set also put me in mind of a similar video shoot that Linsey Dawn Mckenzie did a few years ago called 'Boobahontas'. Very similar appearance, although I cannot make up my mind about who has been the hotter Indian girl!!!

On a totally unrelated point, did anyone catch Chloe's webcam last Friday? I swear that this lady gets hotter and hotter with each passing day !!!!

[bignatslover]

I am pretty sure both of them were inspired by Apache Chief from Superfriends:

[jjsmith]

Does she only do solo modeling now? How often does she update?

[DJPFC]

You would never know looking at it, would you?  It's had the exact same look, text and photos on it since it's inception.  She does such great work, but never showcases it in any way on the site so that it can bring in subscriptions and members.  Such a shame.

[Mercerwatch]

Still the best big bust model site running. Still posts girl on girl shoots from time to time. Updated at least 4 times weekly mostly in the diary section (luckily the best feature on the site) and a new photoset or video posted weekly at the very least. Best of all Chloe is going through a can't-find-clothes-that-fit weight fluctuation thing. 34G at her smallest.  

[andrechenier]

Isn't she like a K cup now?  I think I read that somewhere...

[JJTetons]

She is a bit more voluptuous these days.

[H_man]

Sounds awesome. Anybody got any postable pics to share?

[pedonbio]

Sounds awesome. Anybody got any postable pics to share?

From the resounding silence, I'd guess that others share my concern about "postability".

Pal responds: If the site isn't a Score property and not a rule violation in some other way, then there's nothing wrong with posting a few pix from it within reason. Chloe is probably one of the most beloved models in our community... to share a BIT of her stuff is OK per the BEA Owner's limitations, but of course the last thing we'd want to do is to let it get out of hand and thereby find her new stuff added to the prohibitions.

[Mercerwatch]

Chloe is very protective of her pics. Any attempt to access a gallery on her site is met with a polite plea to not distribute any of the pics. I will say judging by recent candid photos she took herself, her breasts have grown to wow-I'm-somewhat-concerned proportions. 

[pedonbio]

From the resounding silence, I'd guess that others share my concern about "postability".

Pal responds: If the site isn't a Score property and not a rule violation in some other way, then there's nothing wrong with posting a few pix from it within reason. Chloe is probably one of the most beloved models in our community... to share a BIT of her stuff is OK per the BEA Owner's limitations, but of course the last thing we'd want to do is to let it get out of hand and thereby find her new stuff added to the prohibitions.

Pal, I'm sure you know that I wasn't complaining. But Chloe is quite protective of her recent work, as Mercerwatch mentioned, and her older work has been cropped and edited so often that it is almost impossible to determine its origin.

Pal responds: no, I didn't think you were complaining PB... I just wanted to clarify... rulewise. If folks want to refrain from posting her recent stuff here due to her request, then of course that's 100% OK.

[pedonbio]

Perhaps you can help us, Pal. I first saw Chloe in a series of tropical-island shots, probably in the mid-1990s. I've always associated them with the Score Boob Cruises, and have considered them off limits. Do you know whether they were? IMHO they were her best work.

Pal responds: well, stuff from Boob Cruises can be potentially problematic. The professional stuff that Score shot (which I think includes the beach stuff you're mentioning if I recall that correctly) are of course Score property. However, shots taken by other cruisers which are not and were not the copyrighted property of Score are ok. Telling the two apart could be difficult, but again: the occasional honest mistake will be corrected w/o any kind of consequences provided the person making the honest mistake doesn't have a long history of them.

[pedonbio]

Perhaps you can help us, Pal. I first saw Chloe in a series of tropical-island shots, probably in the mid-1990s. I've always associated them with the Score Boob Cruises, and have considered them off limits. Do you know whether they were? IMHO they were her best work.

Pal responds: well, stuff from Boob Cruises can be potentially problematic. The professional stuff that Score shot (which I think includes the beach stuff you're mentioning if I recall that correctly) are of course Score property. However, shots taken by other cruisers which are not and were not the copyrighted property of Score are ok. Telling the two apart could be difficult, but again: the occasional honest mistake will be corrected w/o any kind of consequences provided the person making the honest mistake doesn't have a long history of them.

Alas. Probably the most sexually evocative shots for the "Shirts" thread are from that collection, but I'm 99% certain they are Score property.   

[LostReality]

Chloe is very protective of her pics. Any attempt to access a gallery on her site is met with a polite plea to not distribute any of the pics. I will say judging by recent candid photos she took herself, her breasts have grown to wow-I'm-somewhat-concerned proportions. 

Now Mercerwatch has made me really... really... REALLY excited...
i DO need does candids. right now!
AAAAHHH!

 

[Zephyr]

Now Mercerwatch has made me really... really... REALLY excited...
i DO need does candids. right now!
AAAAHHH!

Us boobaholics think very much alike

I have not paid much attention to her in years... She does look bigger now than in her classic Score sets!