Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #45 on: July 19, 2013, 03:43:42 AM »
It's been a long time not posting on this thread but I had an idea or two and I wanted say them and hear what you think. This first idea came to me when reading the Beshine thread people were talking about how Beshine's breast implants don't float and thinking tho they don't float they could if someone changed the saline to a synthetic oil. A synthetic oil could give the best of three worlds if you found the right one and bring it too market. Those three things being the post expansion option of saline, the some what natural look and feel of silicone even tho it's an implant and being lighter then the other options meaning they float. I know we talked about gas/air implants before for the purpose of making a lighter implant just I feel it's way too far down the spectrum of weight for more then 50 girls maybe too try and then only 4 to 5 girls to keep. You may think that sound like PP implants but with a twist those 5 girls most likely won't get the biggest boobs in the world. I should stop talking about the gas implant idea and get on with my second one. A non newtonian fluid I feel could be used in really fun ways inside of a woman's breast implant. I don't want the type that most know to actually say what one I'm talking about that's the one when it's resting it's soft and when you put pressure to it, it gets hard or firm that's not the one I don't want. The one I do want does the opposite, it's firm, hard or solid when ever at rest giving a girl nice firm boobs that would fall out her top just from bending over, but are soft and jiggly when ever someone plays with them or she starts to really move around. So tell me what you think what ever you thought, you loved it, it was okay or you think my ideas are dumb let me know we could come up with something better.
the unstoppable one

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83878
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #46 on: July 19, 2013, 07:44:49 AM »
There is a material called aerogel which is lighter than air, semi transparent and is solid kinda like jello. I remember there was a discussion about it sometime in the past but I forgot why it was decided it might not be a compatible material. But imagine if it was a fluid with the aforementioned properties. Women could get transplants and have breasts literally bigger than beachballs and no weight issues.  :)

*

ninjrk

  • F Cup
  • 684
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #47 on: July 19, 2013, 08:40:29 PM »
Synthetic oils are probably a no-go.  we've been trying to use them in implantable devices for decades and the body tends to react very poorly to them and they also tend to degrade other lightweight synthetic materials, so an implant shell that would hold it without leakage would be expensive as Hell.  If weight is an issue a shell filled with loosely packed polyethylene or silicone beads in a saline solution might work.  Not sure how it would feel though.
Be nice to everyone you meet, but have a plan to kill them if you have to.

"the only thing unnatural about my tits is how fucking amazing they are!"  LOL

*

Andy_J

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 14
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #48 on: July 19, 2013, 10:03:34 PM »
I personally favour a biological line of inquiry for augmentation instead of artificial methods. I'm looking at gestational gigantomastia as a starting point, the growth rate is phenomenal for the amount of time and it's totally natural. If we can determine the causes and how it happens, recreate the conditions and control the growth, we could put the implant industry out of business.
The Bioengineering Institute for Gigantomastic Growth and Enlargement Research (B.I.G.G.E.R.)

PM me for website link (for amateur gigantomastic research, NOT a pic posting site!)

Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #49 on: July 21, 2013, 04:36:06 AM »
Andy the biological way was going to be my next post but I felt it was to long winded to post with the others I did.

Ninjrk thanks for the info. I thought of bead implants before my first idea was just to have the bead placed in the breast with no shell and that might still work but my bead implants 2.0 idea is to have 10mm sized beads inside of a silicone or polyethylene shell that has 4mm eyelets in them. One more actual breast implant idea I want to call them squid implants for they tentacles. You take an every day silicone/saline breast implant and put 100 or so tentacles that will be 5mm thick and how ever long you want them to be. The soft silicone tentacles should acted just like string implants with the twist because for you should be able to make these implants into expanders so when you drain the outside of them, you can then fill up the inside ;D. Next post I will be talking about DNA should be fun.
the unstoppable one

*

Djoser

  • X Cup
  • 8329
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #50 on: July 21, 2013, 11:26:52 PM »
someday implants will be so big that they would need to be made in sections and assembled latter, and the only way those could get implanted is bt implanting the empty shells and filling them out after the sutures have been closed
Welcome to the internet, where men are men, women are men, and childr3n are the FBI

If it hurts, it means that you're still living

Avatar: beshine, morphed by uutexray, avatarized by AgentDee

Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #51 on: August 17, 2013, 02:38:22 AM »
I said I would talk about DNA so here I go. The best way too go about using genes to make boobs grow is to not to have them (do you know what I'm saying) :-\. You see if you try to find genes that say grow big breast your going to find more then you where looking for and it's only going to be good for people that are going through puberty and not fully grown people who want it. A better way is to find the small few genes that tell one's breast not to grow, by removing some or all of those genes will cause a person to grow bigger TITS. If you don't know why that is it's because even tho are bodies are one living being, if you take off the limits the thing that says no no two lumps of sugar is fine, it will just run wild trying to take over the bodies resources for it's self. It's like removing the main predator for a pray animal, that animal numbers are going to sky rocket, just in this case once we reach are goals we put back the thing we took out. I'm I making scents? One does not have to go as far as removing the gene if they don't want to one could just block it, it all maters on how far or big they want to go or how much money they have. This is part-A part-B coming soon.
the unstoppable one

*

spoon

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 31
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #52 on: October 13, 2013, 07:47:04 AM »
Well, here's hoping that they finally get PEG implants off the ground. Basically by mixing a relativly safe filler (polyethelyne glycol) with saline, it's possible to recreate that silicone feel with the safety of saline. Also it can undergo osmosis and expand in a reliable safe manner. More info here:

http://www.bringoutyourbest.com/plastic-surgery/new-breast-implant-filler-material/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18812723

*

Melons

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 30
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #53 on: March 16, 2014, 09:26:20 AM »
Sounds like some one make make idea real:

(link removed)
Forum rule: Do not post, link to, or provide directions to images showing people or fictional characters who are under the age of 18, appear to be under 18, or are represented as being under 18, even if they are fully clothed.

« Last Edit: October 01, 2014, 09:19:22 PM by gonZo »
It takes courage to grow up and become who you really are.
<i>E. E. Cummings</i>

Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #54 on: October 01, 2014, 03:03:05 AM »
Actually a urethane silicone copolymer shell has excellent potential.  Shell thickness and strength is always a balancing act.  Thick shells do not have aesthetically pleasing results.  Thin shells are too weak.  A urethane silicone copolymer can produce a shell that is 1/10 the thickness of a silicone shell and many times stronger.

juno.

Do you know what was the outcome with the urethane silicone co-polymer? You know I read urethane is probably carcinogenic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethyl_carbamate
Anti-social behaviours lack consideration for the well-being of others. Any types of conduct that violates basic rights (human rights is one of them) of another person. It can show as covert or overt hostility.

Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #55 on: October 01, 2014, 03:05:19 AM »
Well, here's hoping that they finally get PEG implants off the ground. Basically by mixing a relativly safe filler (polyethelyne glycol) with saline, it's possible to recreate that silicone feel with the safety of saline. Also it can undergo osmosis and expand in a reliable safe manner. More info here:

http://www.bringoutyourbest.com/plastic-surgery/new-breast-implant-filler-material/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18812723

And this sounds like something I read a few months ago - elsewhere  8)
Anti-social behaviours lack consideration for the well-being of others. Any types of conduct that violates basic rights (human rights is one of them) of another person. It can show as covert or overt hostility.

*

louhi

  • *
  • 14
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #56 on: October 12, 2014, 07:27:47 PM »
juno.

Do you know what was the outcome with the urethane silicone co-polymer? You know I read urethane is probably carcinogenic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethyl_carbamate


So the article itself says that despite the common name urethane, ethyl carbamate is not a urethane.

*

louhi

  • *
  • 14
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #57 on: October 12, 2014, 07:43:47 PM »
Still wondering about what the professional's impression is of silicone string?

Should be dramatically easier/less iritatting on internal tissues than PPP string, and have a a specific gravity < 1.0 to boot.

Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #58 on: October 13, 2014, 04:23:58 PM »
So the article itself says that despite the common name urethane, ethyl carbamate is not a urethane.

It says urethane is not a component of polyurethane. This is a difference in the meaning.

But it seems I might not get an answer from juno anyway. It is 3 months since he last logged in.
Anti-social behaviours lack consideration for the well-being of others. Any types of conduct that violates basic rights (human rights is one of them) of another person. It can show as covert or overt hostility.

*

louhi

  • *
  • 14
Re: Beyond Silicone
« Reply #59 on: October 13, 2014, 07:45:32 PM »
I'm quite sure it says ethyl carbamate has nothing to do with urethanes.  Poly-urethane is lots of urethanes.

Not carbamate.