[St Stephan]

This tiny picture from  Danni's entry page is all I have, but perhaps someone will be able to identify the babe on the left?




0 ( _{( o} ^! < J
Thanks & a tip of the halo to Tom Taylor for drawing my avatar - now with almonds animation.    

[Palomine]

Perhaps it's not immediately apparent due to the small size of the image, but the gal on the left is none other than Nadine.... on the right is Bettie. This image looks like one from that set of the trio... I think it might have been a parody of Charlie's Angels. It came out at least half a year ago.

[ThisIsNotMyName]

Well, Palo, at least you're a lot closer than certain other benighted cloisterees. The set in question was actually a parody of Russ Meyer's Faster, Pussycat. Must be real dark in that hermitage, eh, O Saintly One? Pardon me, I have to go track down a certain H.dk forum post, and insert a fittingly snide lambaste into it.

lllnnlll lnlnnlnl llllllll nnlnnlnn nnlnnlnn llllllll lnlnnlnl lllnnlll

 

[Palomine]

Of course... it WAS a Russ Meyer spoof... I now seem to recall that it (the series) was named something like Faster Pussycat in the longstanding tradition of porn parodies. The sad thing is that I'm old enough to know RM's work fondly and too old to have bothered catching the recent Charlie's Angels remake in the theaters... my silly mistake.

Though I did get the ID right.

Nadine, Danni and Bettie. Could you possibly get 3 more desirable naturally endowed wonders of womanhood in a single image?

[St Stephan]

Thanks for the ID, Palomine.  Yes, the pic IS close to postage stamp size.

As for thee, TP:

it's good to see you posting again, even though the only thing that seems to bring you out is my poor eyesight.  How about some originality in your caustic gibes (right now on a level of causticity rivaling overcooked fettuccini).  
After all, you have a good example in that hooters Forum post, if it's the one I surmise

0 ( _{( o} ^! < J
[Sighhhh!] The hooters Forum seems to have lost all earlier posts, so one can no longer admire my pyrotechnics.    

[ThisIsNotMyName]

	Yep, you had the right H.dk thread in mind, O Abusive One... [POOF!] Gone. Whatta coincidence, eh? Regarding originality, I'll just say this one thing: As a known user of Substitute Chemistry, you mite wanna rethink that jibe. On further reflection, I have no comment. At least not in public. Amusing as a little flame-a-tete would be, I can't spare the heat. These days I need all my petrol products to keep warm here. Well... most of them, anyways. I don't post much anymore... because I rarely feel a need to say a thing. You BEA folx are so erudite and eloquent, someone eventually covers most of what I would have. Not often very well, but adequately to keep me quiet. I'm content to sit in my cozy corner, and watch the rest of you pirouette. And make images like this one, which never see daylight here.
	�—————————————›
	TransPonder