Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #480 on: May 17, 2015, 02:31:30 AM »
6

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #481 on: May 18, 2015, 03:45:48 AM »
7

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #482 on: May 19, 2015, 09:52:30 PM »
Brief detour from the hacienda...

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #483 on: May 21, 2015, 04:16:10 AM »
8

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #484 on: May 21, 2015, 10:35:43 AM »
I've long since abandoned hope of trying to be sure that a particular VB image hasn't been posted before. Until we get a GRIS-style duplicate-attachment-plugin for the forum that scans uploading attachments vs other pix already in the thread (and no such thing exsists AFAIK) we'll have to put up with the occassional dupe post.

Hope this ain't one of them, but odds are it probably is.

vbell074 ULd VB

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #485 on: May 21, 2015, 04:28:49 PM »
Yeah, that's one of those old colorized photos where it looks like it was done with a paint-by-numbers set.  Yechhh!  

I've never dabbled in learning to do this (combination of being a low priority and little desire due to my being somewhat of a traditionalist taste-wise).  However, I've seen some remarkable newer examples of this technique.  Hard to distinguish from the real deal.  Either advances in the technology or great skill....likely a mix of both.  

Otherwise a great picture.  I've always enjoyed these type of "candid" shots, preferable to obvious posed "in studio" ones.  Gives it a voyeuristic feel that seems like something you might actually stumble your way onto in real life :)
« Last Edit: May 21, 2015, 04:31:06 PM by Gargantual »

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #486 on: May 24, 2015, 02:10:24 AM »
Nice from all angles

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #487 on: May 25, 2015, 03:00:31 AM »
11

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #488 on: May 26, 2015, 03:53:34 AM »
12

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #489 on: May 26, 2015, 04:18:04 AM »
 8)
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #490 on: May 28, 2015, 10:08:07 PM »
Lucky 13!

Something weird about this shot.  It almost looks like someone photoshopped a head onto a different body, if not for all the other shots in this series.  Plus, her bod is pretty unmistakeable!  Probably someone used a heavy hand while airbrushing. 

Sheesh, that's why I haven't been interested in playboy for so long.  Hardly any reality left in those photos.

*

bignatslover

  • P Cup
  • 5351
    • I love the BEA
Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #491 on: May 29, 2015, 10:50:24 AM »
Probably someone used a heavy hand while airbrushing.
Yes, some of the old-timers on here might be able to concur, but I am going to chime in and say it appears they airbrushed Virginia's face and body in that one. Unnecessarily so, in my opinion.

Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #492 on: May 29, 2015, 01:46:46 PM »
1000% on that one.  Of course, I'm not a big fan of makeup either.  (Score stuff often makes me cringe).

It's the whole girl-next-door attainable fantasy I'm referring to.........something a person might actually blunder their way into in real life  :)


*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #493 on: May 29, 2015, 07:34:11 PM »
Hope this next bunch of nice color(ized?) photos hasn't already been posted before. She's got both the seen-from-behind and cute derrière thing going on in this one. ;)

Bell - 1950s BIG TIT Queen - Virginia Bell-c7 ULd VB

*

bignatslover

  • P Cup
  • 5351
    • I love the BEA
Re: Virginia Bell MERGED
« Reply #494 on: May 29, 2015, 07:55:22 PM »
Bell - 1950s BIG TIT Queen - Virginia Bell-c7 ULd VB
Yummy!  Thank you Pal, that pic is certainly new to me and I believe to most all of us.