*

onionwriter

  • E Cup
  • 346
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #165 on: September 09, 2008, 05:50:10 PM »
omg

omg
 omfg

saArah just wroTe be back

hA! lmfaAO!!!!!

i am SO in love.

oh, <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 xxxxxxxxxxooooooooo

i aM so in LUv!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i M so glad + happee + glad

i LUB my gril!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i wlii tlee u all what happns. OMG! OMFG! SARAH, GIRL I 3> U 4 ever!!!!!!!!!!!

*

Real

  • G Cup
  • 2479
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #166 on: September 09, 2008, 06:53:51 PM »
well for starters i think it would be great if any american politican or journalist bothered to ask a very simple question;  how many, if any, south ossetians were killed by georgia before the russian military advanced?  "what happened" is never as important as "spin it for our team".  not to say im taking up for a gangster like putin but facts are facts.

and like i said before; how is this lady going to go toe to toe with him when she's scared of anderson cooper and george stephanopoulos?  or does this fellow maverick only speak to who her handlers allow her to?...
My current avatar is: Manda Dawn

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #167 on: September 09, 2008, 07:11:45 PM »
Quote:

Real said:
well for starters i think it would be great if any american politican or journalist bothered to ask a very simple question;  how many, if any, south ossetians were killed by georgia before the russian military advanced?  "what happened" is never as important as "spin it for our team".  not to say im taking up for a gangster like putin but facts are facts.

 




America used to have people who asked questions like that.

We don't any more.

BTW, I can't find the answer from BBC or Reuters, either. That's what makes it weird: Everybody seems interested in that question not being asked. Putin wants everyone to think "many"; Bush and McCain want everyone to think "none". I think it is a number between "none" and "many".
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

mofoapoo

  • X Cup
  • 1923
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #168 on: September 10, 2008, 01:35:25 AM »
Quote:

pedonbio said:\Putin wants everyone to think "many"; Bush and McCain want everyone to think "none". I think it is a number between "none" and "many".




we can easily figure that out.

the answer is some.  or a handful.  or a couple people here or there.  or generic amount.
I can't think of anything creative to put here, so i give up.

*

onionwriter

  • E Cup
  • 346
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #169 on: September 10, 2008, 04:37:58 AM »
Quote:

mofoapoo said:
Quote:

pedonbio said:\Putin wants everyone to think "many"; Bush and McCain want everyone to think "none". I think it is a number between "none" and "many".




we can easily figure that out.

the answer is some.  or a handful.  or a couple people here or there.  or generic amount.




And getting back to the point, do you think a small-town Alaska mayor can answer that?

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #170 on: September 10, 2008, 09:26:44 AM »
You know what? The fact that she was a small-town mayor and is currently the governor of a state with a pretty small population doesn't faze me; what fazes me are her policies. She is a kook, a hypocrite, and as bad a politician as any in the Republican Party ("Bridge to Nowhere", "Troopergate", etc.). Fortunately, we are not for voting her (at least, all things being equal, we're not, since God forbid something should happen to McCain and she does have to be sworn in as president); we are voting for her boss, her cynical, politically-manipulative, older-than-the-hills, so-called-maverick-but-in-reality-dittohead boss. If he really wanted to choose a VP candidate that had boobs, in order to pander to dead-ender Hillary supporters, the least he could have done was to have chosen a woman of impeccable ability, judgement and (dare I say it?) experience. Did he suddenly lose the phone numbers of Elizabeth Dole, Olympia Snowe or Kay Bailey Hutchison?

There's a good reason why Gov. Palin is hiding out from the media until such a time as she can get a hand-picked reporter to lob softball questions at her; her handlers know that, as Obama said recently, you can put lipstick on a pig but it still is a pig. She is soooo outre in her thinking that no matter how physically attractive she is, if the spotlight was shone on her and the right questions were asked of her, no one in their right mind would vote for McCain.

This choice, although maybe good on the outside, at least in the sense of being able to fire up the female segment of the Republican base, shows without doubt how poor McCain's judgment really is. If only he had chosen someone with much less baggage and with more sense, we would not be having this conversation. And it doesn't matter if the person he'd chosen was a man or a woman, either.

The only silver lining in this is, perhaps some time in the next 50+ days before the election, wiser heads will prevail and make McCain do an Eagleton.
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

mastert

  • D Cup
  • 275
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #171 on: September 10, 2008, 09:30:53 AM »
I'm not worried, she'll be exposed by Joe Biden in the debates. They just need to check her for earpieces.

Obama made that comment about a pig with lipstick is still a pig. The media picked that up and now are accusing of Obama of being a bully. Is this woman completely off limits? Can't talk about her family, although she parades them around like circus animals. Can't talk about her own comments because you're picking on her. I HATE the media. Walter Kronkite must be on the verge of a stroke.

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #172 on: September 10, 2008, 09:38:58 AM »
Quote:

mastert: I'm not worried, she'll be exposed by Joe Biden in the debates. They just need to check her for earpieces.


That's exactly what I've been saying to my friends

Yahoo! News: "No questions, please; Palin sticks to her script"

Yahoo! News: "E-mails, conspiracy rumors plague Palin"
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

ROUNDandHEAVY

  • Rookie of the Year
  • 7613
  • My name is Bob, Round is just my favorite shape. ;
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #173 on: September 10, 2008, 11:02:02 AM »
I just got this !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fexmKvt_BIc

I cracked up!
 
Call me Bob.

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #174 on: September 10, 2008, 03:06:16 PM »
You see now, if she starts campaigning dressed like that, McCain might win by a landslide, and we can't be having that
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #175 on: September 10, 2008, 03:42:58 PM »
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

onionwriter

  • E Cup
  • 346
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #176 on: September 10, 2008, 04:07:06 PM »
I just realized -- and I'm embarrassed that I was so dumb -- the problem is not Palin.

I backed Hillary and felt pretty strongly about it.

The real problem is us. Look at how the polls have bumped McCain up so sharply because so many Hillary backers have jumped over.

WE are the problem. We will get the exact government we deserve.

It's not that Palin is dumb, or shallow, or ignorant or shockingly unqualified . . .

She merely mirrors ourselves.

*

BarnacleBill

  • P Cup
  • 1662
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #177 on: September 10, 2008, 04:49:15 PM »
Your right pedonbio.

It makes me think that no media really cares because the real power brokers, the real status quo, will stay in power regardless of who wins the White House.

Either that, or the real power brokers own the media anyway.
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #178 on: September 10, 2008, 04:56:35 PM »
Quote:

BarnacleBill said:
Your right pedonbio.

It makes me think that no media really cares because the real power brokers, the real status quo, will stay in power regardless of who wins the White House.

Either that, or the real power brokers own the media anyway.


I disagree that no media cares (look at stuff on PBS like NOW and Bill Moyers' Journal, for instance)...but I will agree that one of the biggest mistakes of the Bill Clinton administration was allowing the consolidation of media, that spawned such monstrosities like Fox News Channel.
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Sarah Palin
« Reply #179 on: September 10, 2008, 05:07:58 PM »
Quote:

onionwriter: The real problem is us. Look at how the polls have bumped McCain up so sharply because so many Hillary backers have jumped over.

WE are the problem. We will get the exact government we deserve.


Too true. We the people let idiots run for governor and for president, we don't study the true issues, we allow ourselves to get distracted by irrelevancies...look at the current noise being made about Obama's statement about lipstick. Lipstick. SARAH PALIN IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, JOHN MCCAIN IS. Comparing Barack Obama with Sarah Palin is comparing apples to oranges, and it's a distraction, taking us away from the important issues, like a guy who thinks that people who earn $5 million a year are in the middle class.

Why do we continue to fall for this crap?!??!

Comedy Central's finest take on Sarah Palin
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.