Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 59
Topics: « previous next »
*

St Stephan

  • Moderator
  • 2682
In vein? MERGED with Veins on Boobs
« on: February 07, 2003, 06:04:11 PM »
The "problem" of veins pushed out by implants was the subject of this  Forum thread several months ago.  How do you feel about prominent veins on breasts?  I find them a real turn-on, and  I was wondering how many of you share this feeling.  It may be because they underline the realness of the breast, or at least the skin (although they could put veins on latex, I suppose). I know not everyone agrees (see the thread): what about you?  To help you decide, I'm posting a few relevant pics.

This week's motto: Vanitas vanitatem et omnia vanitas.

0 ( ( o ! < J
"Veins, veins, veins are everything" (or something like that ).    
Logged
Avatar with the gracious approval of the lovely Vanessa Montagne.
BEA members will find the full-sized (1.12 MB) animation,
cleansed of clumsy clowning claptrap by cloddish clerics, here.
For the original pictures, and thousands more, visit Vanessa.
*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25235
Re: In vein?
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2003, 07:16:50 PM »
   For me, the beauty is skin deep. Thinking about the blood and guts underneath is for doctors.  

   
Logged
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....
*

Cinori

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 15
Re: In vein?
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2003, 08:05:49 PM »
I've always been fond of a few light blue veins anywhere they happen to appear. They imply the sort of pale, clear, healthy skin I find attractive and they're a detail of visual interest. Ropelike veins like the sort on Chelsea Charms much discussed breasts are somewhat more upsetting to me because they remind me of the sort of veins apparent on erections and the necks and arms of the hyper-muscled... not things I like to associate with femeninity.

Your mileage may vary.  
Logged
*

Catch

  • Z Cup
  • 3075
Re: In vein?
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2003, 08:41:56 PM »
When it comes to CC's vein I'm prejudice. When breasts are that big imperfection is easily tolerated.
Logged
If only...
*

Phantombuster

  • C Cup
  • 74
Re: In vein?
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2003, 09:13:18 PM »
I will admit, for some reason, the blue viens coming thru the skin of a very busty girl in er breasts is a really big turn on to me too.  
Logged
Thats right cindy, its quarter past the hour and here are the buckinghams with Kind of a drag.
*

rtpoe

  • Old Fart
  • 12406
Re: In vein?
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2003, 09:15:52 PM »
Sorry, they're not for me.

(Arteries are another matter entirely...)

rtpoe  
Logged
rtpoe

I thought that spring must last forevermore;
For I was young and loved, and it was May.
-  Vera Brittain, May Morning
*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: In vein?
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2003, 09:17:26 PM »
I agree exactly with Cinori... none or some is fine. Too much/too obvious such as those on Chelsea isn't my cup of tea for the exact reasons he stated.
Logged
*

Fret Pearson

  • E Cup
  • 277
Re: In vein?
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2003, 01:25:37 AM »
Veins are not my cup of tea.  Especially bulging ones.  However if the breasts are huge I could probably overlook them... the breasts just wouldn't be "perfect" to my eyes.

Fret  

Logged
*

sheber

  • Shasta'man
  • 8577
    • http://www.bearchive.com/~shasta/
Re: In vein?
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2003, 03:17:41 AM »
Perhaps I just accept them and the lady as they are, or perhaps I romanticize their presence. Life blood and all that....
Logged
[Rent this space]
*

Pixeltiger

  • G Cup
  • 949
    • www.diveinthedark.com
Re: In vein?
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2003, 05:25:32 PM »
Firstly I have to say that anyone who considers Chelsea anything other than the very apex of femininity should step outside so I can kick their ass  

But seriously folks, on the vein subject, I can't say they bother one way or the other. Having been fortunate enough to have met Chelsea in the flesh on several occasions, I can testify that the veins are not really that evident face to face. I think they just get emphasised in photos from certain angles.

Plus it should be remembered that all skin needs a blood supply and the bigger the tits, the more skin and the more supply required.

Pixeltiger  
Logged
*

Whink

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4544
Train in vein!
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2003, 05:30:40 PM »
Amen to that one, bro, Chelsea is unbelievable.  here's a sample from her latest photo set.

And just one more thing... Join her site!!

Breast regards,

Dub-Ya  
Logged


Thanks to Morphemor for the latest Avatar!
*

St Stephan

  • Moderator
  • 2682
Re: Train in vein!
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2003, 06:03:51 PM »
So where's the sample?

Anyway, I've just posted one of Chelsea, probably the best example of my topic for today, ropy veins.  I'll just take this occasion to point out how I differ from some colleagues above:  I neither dislike prominent breast veins nor merely tolerate them, I love 'em!  I've given my possible reason in my opening post - "possible," because I'm only guessing as to the underlying psychological reasons.  

0 ( ( o ! < J
Or maybe it's because I have an alter ego who yearns to tap veins for food?    
Logged
Avatar with the gracious approval of the lovely Vanessa Montagne.
BEA members will find the full-sized (1.12 MB) animation,
cleansed of clumsy clowning claptrap by cloddish clerics, here.
For the original pictures, and thousands more, visit Vanessa.
*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: In vein?
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2003, 07:15:33 PM »
Implants, even giant ones, don't require blood flow. The whole point of them is that they're inert insofar as the body is concerned (ideally, anyway). So, in some earlier pix of Chelsea, her veins weren't nearly so prominent (didn't someone once post pre or early (small) implant pix of her some time ago) thus it's reasonable to assume that the huge implants, or the surgeries required to install/adjust them has made the veins appear considerably more prominent. Fortunately for her, there are plenty of guys out there (obviously) who dig that sort of thing...
Logged
*

Pixeltiger

  • G Cup
  • 949
    • www.diveinthedark.com
Re: In vein?
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2003, 07:25:03 PM »
Just to reiterate: I did not say that implants require a blood supply,
but skin does and Chelsea's tits are covered in skin whatever may be
underneath them.

Pixeltiger  
Logged
*

docross

  • D Cup
  • 154
Re: In vein?
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2003, 07:52:48 PM »
I really don't like veins, not only on tits, I don't like them at all!

However Chelsea is too big to be criticized!

ciao  
Logged
DocRoss
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 59
Topics: « previous next »