MasterD, thanks.
I feel moved to respond because my answering machine has been getting all kinds of robot calls on behalf of McCain and the Republicans and I just got a new one this morning.
Looking over this, some bubbles pop spontaneously -- not the least of which is one of the sources being Fox News. I also worry a little about a site which is "blog" first and not "washingtonpost" first.
The judges claim is entirely subjective. Come the Bush-Gore election, the Supreme Court "interpreted" the living hell out of the Constitution. So that claim is, to put it mildly, irresponsibly phrased. As for health care -- this is a negative? And as the brother of a lesbian, I have to ask -- supporting homosexual marriage is another negative?
Virtually no liberal on Earth supports abortion literally THROUGHOUT pregnancy, suggesting that it can be performed right up until the moment of birth. Really wretched phrasing there. The Bible was not written by doctors. A quarry is not a stone house; a sack of flour is not a loaf of bread; a fetus has a long way to go yet to become independent of its host, its mother, and become a human being in its own right. However, no one is anti-baby. Rare, deservedly, is the liberal who would even touch a third trimester fetus, and they full well know it.
Iraq troops out immediately? Obama is too much the politician -- and strategist -- to act this bluntly upon the Pick-Up Sticks game that is Iraq. They know that too -- or should.
The gun question is a flat lie. The only issue is registration. Is registration for your car proof that our society is against your owning it?
And 3rde -- I've been wondering a while if the machinery has been playing to a "Barack Obama = Nicolae Carpathia" equation. Carpathia is the Antichrist of the Left Behind books. Carpathia makes no historical sense -- Hitler still remains the best candidate for Antichrist I've ever seen (not that I really even care). Luckily, the Left Behind books don't even make any sense to most Christians.