*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #180 on: January 06, 2010, 04:11:16 PM »
Seen her before Hiram... perhaps that same pic. No idea who she is. Here's another unknown, predating yours by 50 years perhaps.


*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #181 on: January 06, 2010, 04:15:21 PM »
Seen her before Hiram... perhaps that same pic. No idea who she is. Here's another unknown, predating yours by 50 years perhaps.



Candy Barr
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #182 on: January 08, 2010, 10:26:42 AM »
And speaking of Hiram, he posted this on the "Pics that make you wanna pop!!" thread:

« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 10:28:42 AM by TheZookie007 »
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #183 on: January 08, 2010, 12:58:37 PM »
Thanks for the Candy Barr ID gOOber! :) Anyone know who Hiram's areola queen below might be? here's a well-capped blonde... she MIGHT be that Russian escort "Victoria" from years ago, though I'm not positive. (no idea why it's not attaching properly, but you get the idea)

« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 01:00:34 PM by Palomine »

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #184 on: January 09, 2010, 03:50:43 PM »
Perhaps Julie Williams, but I'm in a rut guesswise lately, so will defer to the experts here instead. ;)


*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #185 on: January 10, 2010, 07:56:14 PM »
Shazam! Sorry, no ID but familiar looking. :)


*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #186 on: January 11, 2010, 12:23:08 AM »
No idea who she is either, but I'm loving her ripe thighs.
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #187 on: January 11, 2010, 11:14:33 PM »
Still more probably-never-to-be-identified vintage goodness. Mouthfilling areolas on this pretty, albeit serious-looking lovely.


*

Goldeneye

  • The Midas Look
  • 12443
  • The Midas Look
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #188 on: January 11, 2010, 11:23:49 PM »
No idea who she is either, but I'm loving her ripe thighs.

Yes! Bite-worthy!

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #189 on: January 30, 2010, 06:07:17 PM »
A bit less off the beaten path: Cher Butler from mid-eighties Playboy, who is both pretty and blessed with very nice areolas.


*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #190 on: February 04, 2010, 02:47:36 PM »
Reminding me of a smaller version of Tiffany Towers, Danielle Rogers appeared (I think) in the Holiday special of Hustler in or around '02. Yes, they're implants of course, but she's awful pretty and that hard stare goes so nicely with those large areolas and tight body. IMO of course. ;)

« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 03:45:29 PM by Palomine »

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #191 on: February 06, 2010, 11:36:05 AM »
I don't know anything about Debra Turner, other than the fact that she's real cute... I *know* that in RL, some guys might be just a bit disappointed by a set like that: merely modest in size, a wee bit droopy, with disproportionately large areolas. However, the last time *I* saw a set like that in RL, the only thing I was thinking was "Hot damn, I am one lucky S.O.B.!" :D


*

espy

  • G Cup
  • 2057
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #192 on: February 06, 2010, 09:36:16 PM »
Impossible not to notice!  Don't have a name...
How would a girl with huge boobs ever know if she's truly interesting?

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #193 on: February 07, 2010, 09:22:06 PM »
Not sure who this sweet thing might be. Open to any info of course. ;)


*

Goldeneye

  • The Midas Look
  • 12443
  • The Midas Look
Re: Areolas redux.
« Reply #194 on: February 09, 2010, 05:35:40 PM »
Wow, you can't do any wrong in this thread. Oh, good LORD Danielle Rogers is hot. And pretty sure my face belongs between the thighs of that sweet thing in the above post.

I don't know anything about Debra Turner, other than the fact that she's real cute... I *know* that in RL, some guys might be just a bit disappointed by a set like that: merely modest in size, a wee bit droopy, with disproportionately large areolas. However, the last time *I* saw a set like that in RL, the only thing I was thinking was "Hot damn, I am one lucky S.O.B.!" :D

Ain't a damn thing wrong with that woman!