The gang should be all here...shortly....

MaxBigfoot · « **Reply #120 on:** June 09, 2003, 02:41:39 PM »

This is the 120th post to this thread.

Cappy_Canucklehead · « **Reply #121 on:** June 09, 2003, 04:43:44 PM »

Quote:

<table width=100% border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 bgColor=#4E77AE><tr><td align=right valign=top width=100% style="line-height: 18px; font-size: 16px;">
Topical ointments should generally not be taken internally. Always read and follow label directions. 
Most toothpaste formulations are safe to consume in limited quantities. 
By inference, therefore, we can see that toothpaste is not generally a topical ointment, and should not be applied to external body parts. 
Regardless of how much it excites one's partner!
 </td></tr><tr><td align=right valign=bottom width=100% height=26 style="line-height: 26px; font-size: 26px;">TransPonder</td></tr></table>

And since TP is using a pic he thinks depicts me, I thought it about right that we celebrate the fifth anniversary of his great penmanship as Bubba the bouncer:

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Well. I guess aan apology wasn't good enough for TranSponder-now he threatening to ruin my life...</TITLE>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<html>

<head>
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=iso-8859-1">
<title>Breast Expansion Archive - Pictures, videos, stories and art related to breast growth, breast expansion, breast enlargement and big tits</title>
</head>

<body TEXT="#FFFFFF" BGCOLOR="#000033" LINK="#FF9900" VLINK="#CC6600" ALINK="#FFFFFF">

<a href="http://www.bearchive.com/cgi-bin/redirect.cgi" target="_top"><img src="../images/interface/beheader.gif" alt="The Breast Expansion Archive" width="450" height="50" border="0"></a>

</body>
</html>
</HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#000033" TEXT="#FFFFFF" LINK="#FF9900" VLINK="#CC6600" ALINK="#FFFFFF">
<BIG><BIG><BIG>The Breast Expansion Forum</BIG></BIG></BIG>
[ <A HREF="#Responses">Read Responses</A> | <A HREF="#PostResponse">Post a New Response</A> | <A HREF="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi">Return to the Index</A> ]
 [ <A HREF="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?read=26926">Previous</A> | <A HREF="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?read=26931">Next in Thread</A> | <A HREF="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?read=26928">Next</A> ]<HR>
<BIG><BIG><BIG>Well. I guess aan apology wasn't good enough for TranSponder-now he threatening to ruin my life...</BIG></BIG></BIG>
Posted by <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">Captain Canucklehead</A> on Wednesday, 24 February 1999, at 1:34 p.m.

Just got this e-mail from TransPonder today. I want everyone in this community to see the kind of individual he is. I have already apologized to him, but I
 guess he wants it again with html-driven neons lights so everyone can see.
To begin with, he used a false name and topic so I would not suspect it was him:
Here is the content of his e-mail:
From:
"Dom Knots Subject: about the carlton video
It's how I know you're SCC. Read this entire message, or your -real-
 life is mine to ruin.
That's right... your real life. You went so far beyond reason the last
 time that I could sue you penniless, and have you imprisoned for many
 years in a Federal penitentiary here in Virginia. You wouldn't even get
 a choice of venue; your words came through my modem, and that
 determines
 where the crimes took place.
If I were intent on destroying you... you'd be sure of that by now.
Because of Van dee and you, I didn't get to assemble a Who Is This Quiz
 three weeks ago; it wasn't in the v2n3 issue of BEhavior, and people
 know who to thank for that. Be proud; all too often, you've been a
 major
 disruptor at the BEA.
That might not be so bad if you weren't so blatantly wrong. Once you
 understand how the Web works, the idea that I would need to hack
 MediaOne to connect 'Van Dee' with 'The Man' becomes self-evidently
 silly. All it took was to watch him post a spiteful message as The Man,
 and look for a message with the same IP number from someone else. Van
 Dee was foolish enough to attach his real account name to his abusive
 posts; somewhere along the line he saw how badly that exposed him, and
 he switched to an alias for his snide remarks. Too little, too late:
 the
 system found him anyway. All I did was to help it happen faster. My
 records of his past infractions sealed his fate; he's been caught
 before, but there wasn't much to be done about it. The methodology to
 ban ab-users wasn't ready, but it will be soon. Anyone who doesn't dump
 on people won't be the least bit concerned that Owner has a system in
 place to track the abuse; they'll realize why it's become necessary,
 and
 go on enjoying the site. Van Dee has a lot to worry about, and if you
 revert to your old ways you will too.
Maybe now you can think back and see what the real problem was: Van Dee
 got caught peeing in the bushes, by a system that will be universal
 soon. Instead of being honest about it, he admitted he's done it before
 and wasn't the least bit regretful, and openly said he'll do it again.
 He then proved he's a newbie by making all the wrong guesses. If he's
 fool enough to bring MediaOne into this stupid fracas, the minute they
 see his first post he's history. They -will- see it, if they ask
 anything about the incident; I have every one of his posts saved. Now
 you can get deeply worried: I have all of yours saved too. They're gone
 from the Forum... but they are far from forgotten. I don't even need a
 Cray; the whole series fits on one floppy, screencaps and all.
Here's what they show: you've dumped on the BEA several times, and
 tried
 each time to say you were an innocent victim of the cruelty of others.
 Your protestations of innocence ring hollow; those who remember the
 prior events know you're trying to distort the record. This time out,
 you heard an accusation that seemed like the perfect way to rub me off
 the map. That it charged me with committing a felony probably never
 entered your thoughts; by repeating the charge, you were exposing me to
 the slight, but very real, possibility of being arrested by actual US
 Marshals. I have the proof that the charge was spurious... but they
 might not have even deigned to look at it. -I- could be sitting in a
 jail cell right now, for something that never happened.
I've gotten legal advice about that, and it's very bad news for you. By
 repeating an obviously false felony charge, you were committing
 felonies
 yourself. That you didn't understand the falseness of the charges would
 be no defense; others saw how ludicrous they were, and you should
 reasonably have been able to see that as well. You have no way to
 defend
 yourself if I press charges; the incidents in the past don't ameliorate
 your actions here to any significant degree. Worse news; by openly
 soliciting Van Dee's help to take me down, you were fomenting a
 conspiracy. You only did that once in the open; for that one statement,
 you could receive ten years in a Federal pen, and a $100,000 fine. Not
 a
 pretty thing to contemplate, is it?
You also slandered me many times, by claiming I had abused my knowledge
 of the Web to harass ab-users illegally, engaged in witchhunts against
 you, and taught others to do the same. For that, I could sue for
 defamation of character with willful malice. You'd get to say goodbye
 to
 every penny you ever set aside; you'd lose the case, and all your
 holdings. You wouldn't even have the funds to defend against the felony
 charges; all your bank accounts would be frozen.
In short, I have your life in my hands. Not Web pages; not an email
 inbox; not an ISP account; your whole life.
But none of that has happened. This is the final proof of how wrong
 you've always been about me: I could destroy you utterly, and still
 haven't done it. Because it would do great harm to the BEA, I once
 again
 forebore to strike you down. I let you prance back into the BEA, and
 bask in the feeling of having ousted the Lord High Inquisitor; as far
 as
 anyone knows, he's dead. Even TransPonder is nowhere to be seen. Bubba
 is a pale imitation; the bugs are realizing it, and starting to
 proliferate. You're Captain Canuck, hero of the unjustly accused. Lucky
 you, you get to fight to save the bugs.
Enjoy it... because the LHI is very much alive, and he could use the
 proofs of your actions anytime he wanted to. The statute of limitations
 for the felonies you committed is seven years; for that long, you get
 to
 live with the constant knowledge that you're still subject to that
 possibility. Consider it as your probation, and make sure it never has
 to be revoked. My patience for your antics has been exhausted; if you
 slip up badly this time, or ever again... I don't say a word. I walk
 into the local US Attorney's office; it's a five-minute drive. I show
 them the files I have, and watch them realize they're a perfect vehicle
 to get easy publicity. They need a case that proves they're not
 pursuing
 hackers just to be assholes; this is that case. They'll snap it up
 instantly. I know; one of my contacts works in that office, and he
 confirmed that they're looking for a case like mine right now. He
 practically begged me to give him my files.
Aren't you glad I said "No"?
I'm hoping you follow hockey, because there's a metaphor that should
 help you see how far afield you've gone. When two NHL players decide to
 fight, the referees let them have a good bash at each other, then sit
 them down to cool off. But if a third man enters the fray, he's taken
 out of it as swiftly as possible, and the punishment for his jumping in
 is severe. He gets a Game Major penalty, which cripples his team; he
 also comes under review by the League. If they determine his offense
 was
 blatant, he could even find himself banned from the game for life.
By choosing to believe Van Dee's paranoid nonsense, you became the
 third
 man in. By continuing to reject obvious proof that there was no foul,
 you've made your situation blatant. By openly asking him to help you
 against me, you as much as mugged the ref. Whether I get any say in how
 the League rules on your offense is irrelevant; Owner has the resources
 to see the whole truth here, without any input from me.
The entire series of posts is gone, so it's too late for you to go back
 and look for the pattern. All the proof you needed was there, but how
 you chose to read the threads made the difference in what you saw. If
 Van Dee had any real evidence that I had done any hacking, I'd already
 be under arrest. If MediaOne is any good at all, they could find such
 evidence if it existed. They won't, because it doesn't. I connected the
 two names without going anywhere near his personal information.
Van Dee was stupid enough to use his real account name, and now he may
 get to learn why that's a dumb thing for a hatemonger to do. I have the
 proof, which I could easily use to convince MediaOne to shut off his
 account; he's added the admission that makes it ironclad. But that's
 not
 something I've ever had to do at the BEA before, and I'm not eager to
 do
 it now. I saw it done to someone when I did ISP tech. The charge was
 spurious, and I knew it; in the short time it took for me to bring
 forth
 the evidence the customer had already been cut off, and he decided to
 turn down a free account as the company's apology for jumping to the
 wrong conclusion. The person who leveled the false charge was dumped,
 and their account was marked with a tech-note: never reopen this
 account, or open any other in this person's name, for any reason. Their
 credit card number went into a hotlist of "No Accept" numbers; they
 won't be back there using it, no matter how many times they try.
That's why I'm willing to warn people about the risk of being
 terminated, but loath to use the method. I've dealt with several cases
 like that, and every one was disgusting. Seeing some jerk use his
 account priveleges to heap indignity after outrage upon some
 undeserving
 soul was infuriating; the hassle involved in hammering such a jerk was
 enough to convince me it's only appropriate when all other methods have
 failed. Congratulations: you're the first at the BEA to get to that
 happy position. Choose your words and actions there carefully from now
 on, or you'll be lucky if all you get is bounced by Bubba.
Sadly, you have an even worse line to walk. You chose to become Captain
 Canuck... and I intend to hold you to your word. You will be my
 conscience; if I ever have need for an outside review of an ugly
 situation, it will be dropped into your lap. You will come to see what
 a
 pleasure it is to wade throught a pile of filth looking for the facts;
 you might even come to a grudging respect for the things I go through
 on
 behalf of the BEA's visitors. There are several others defending the
 place, but none has the stomach to deal with the things I take on. Pray
 the new interface ends that shit, because otherwise you may get to see
 it up close next time.
You state that you believe I hold a grudge against you; if I did, I
 could have pursued it anytime in the last five months. Just as I've
 been
 doing whenever someone steps over the line of common decency, I've told
 you repeatedly that you were out of line. Instead of paying any heed to
 those warnings, you interpreted them as personal attacks and responded
 in the same manner you thought I had chosen. By now you'd better know
 how wrong you were; if anyone holds a grudge here, that would be you.
 What little I had any reason to apologize for, I've already addressed;
 I've been doing the things expected of a Moderator at the BEA, and you
 have no grounds to complain about them. At most other websites with
 public Fora, you'd have been thrown out months ago.
If this email doesn't convince you that you have plenty to be sorry
 for,
 you may gain unlimited time to reconsider your position. I suggest you
 start composing an apology now, while things like wardens and lockdowns
 aren't part of your daily routine. Your only other choice is to dare me
 to ruin your life, and I am certain I can do just that. The famous Fat
 Lady is all warmed up and ready to take the stage, and she's one BBW
 you
 won't like meeting at all. If you ever want to cruise the news again,
 make sure the curtain comes down before she gets a chance to sing the
 Underture.
No snide sig here, because it would get in the way. Just the name I
 used
 to enjoy coming to the BEA under, and hope to one day enjoy going back
 to using all by itself with no need for dire warnings:
 TransPonder
End of e-mail.

Well, TransPonder, here you are in all your glory.
I have said I have made my apologies and I will not make any more.
 Do what you have to do. Don't let your ego get in the way.
 (It is all really, thats at stake here, isn't it?)


<A NAME="Responses"><HR></A><BIG><BIG>Responses</BIG></BIG>
<UL><LI><A HREF="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?read=26931">From one Captain to another...</A> The Sencho -- Wednesday, 24 February 1999, at 2:17 p.m.
<UL>
</UL>
<LI>NEW: <A HREF="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?read=26941">Re: Well. I guess aan apology wasn't good enough for TranSponder-now he threatening to ruin my life...</A> UNDERCOVERMAN -- Wednesday, 24 February 1999, at 6:13 p.m.
<UL>
<LI>NEW: <A HREF="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?read=26943">Oh please-anyplace but Winnipeg!...</A> Captain Canucklehead -- Wednesday, 24 February 1999, at 6:32 p.m.
<UL>
</UL>
</UL>
</UL>
<A NAME="PostResponse"><HR></A><BIG><BIG>Post a New Response</BIG></BIG>
<FORM METHOD=POST ACTION="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?post">
<INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME="followup" VALUE="26927">
<CENTER><TABLE><TR>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT>Your Name:</TD><TD><INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME="name" SIZE=40 VALUE="Captain Canucklehead"></TD></TR><TR>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT>E-Mail Address:</TD><TD><INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME="email" SIZE=40 VALUE="[email protected]"></TD></TR><TR>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT>Subject:</TD><TD><INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME="subject" SIZE=40 VALUE="Re: Well. I guess aan apology wasn't good enough for TranSponder-now he threatening to ruin my life..."></TD></TR><TR>
<TD COLSPAN=2 ALIGN=CENTER>Message: <TEXTAREA COLS=80 ROWS=15 NAME="body" WRAP=VIRTUAL>

> Just got this e-mail from TransPonder today. I want everyone
> in this community to see the kind of individual he is. I have already
> apologized to him, but I
> guess he wants it again with html-driven neons lights so everyone
> can see.

> To begin with, he used a false name and topic so I would not
> suspect it was him:

> Here is the content of his e-mail:

> From:

> "Dom Knots Subject: about the carlton video

> It's how I know you're SCC. Read this entire message, or your
> -real-
> life is mine to ruin.

> That's right... your real life. You went so far beyond reason
> the last
> time that I could sue you penniless, and have you imprisoned
> for many
> years in a Federal penitentiary here in Virginia. You wouldn't
> even get
> a choice of venue; your words came through my modem, and that
>
> determines
> where the crimes took place.

> If I were intent on destroying you... you'd be sure of that by
> now.

> Because of Van dee and you, I didn't get to assemble a Who Is
> This Quiz
> three weeks ago; it wasn't in the v2n3 issue of BEhavior, and
> people
> know who to thank for that. Be proud; all too often, you've been
> a
> major
> disruptor at the BEA.

> That might not be so bad if you weren't so blatantly wrong. Once
> you
> understand how the Web works, the idea that I would need to hack
>
> MediaOne to connect 'Van Dee' with 'The Man' becomes self-evidently
>
> silly. All it took was to watch him post a spiteful message as
> The Man,
> and look for a message with the same IP number from someone else.
> Van
> Dee was foolish enough to attach his real account name to his
> abusive
> posts; somewhere along the line he saw how badly that exposed
> him, and
> he switched to an alias for his snide remarks. Too little, too
> late:
> the
> system found him anyway. All I did was to help it happen faster.
> My
> records of his past infractions sealed his fate; he's been caught
>
> before, but there wasn't much to be done about it. The methodology
> to
> ban ab-users wasn't ready, but it will be soon. Anyone who doesn't
> dump
> on people won't be the least bit concerned that Owner has a system
> in
> place to track the abuse; they'll realize why it's become necessary,
>
> and
> go on enjoying the site. Van Dee has a lot to worry about, and
> if you
> revert to your old ways you will too.

> Maybe now you can think back and see what the real problem was:
> Van Dee
> got caught peeing in the bushes, by a system that will be universal
>
> soon. Instead of being honest about it, he admitted he's done
> it before
> and wasn't the least bit regretful, and openly said he'll do
> it again.
> He then proved he's a newbie by making all the wrong guesses.
> If he's
> fool enough to bring MediaOne into this stupid fracas, the minute
> they
> see his first post he's history. They -will- see it, if they
> ask
> anything about the incident; I have every one of his posts saved.
> Now
> you can get deeply worried: I have all of yours saved too. They're
> gone
> from the Forum... but they are far from forgotten. I don't even
> need a
> Cray; the whole series fits on one floppy, screencaps and all.
>

> Here's what they show: you've dumped on the BEA several times,
> and
> tried
> each time to say you were an innocent victim of the cruelty of
> others.
> Your protestations of innocence ring hollow; those who remember
> the
> prior events know you're trying to distort the record. This time
> out,
> you heard an accusation that seemed like the perfect way to rub
> me off
> the map. That it charged me with committing a felony probably
> never
> entered your thoughts; by repeating the charge, you were exposing
> me to
> the slight, but very real, possibility of being arrested by actual
> US
> Marshals. I have the proof that the charge was spurious... but
> they
> might not have even deigned to look at it. -I- could be sitting
> in a
> jail cell right now, for something that never happened.

> I've gotten legal advice about that, and it's very bad news for
> you. By
> repeating an obviously false felony charge, you were committing
>
> felonies
> yourself. That you didn't understand the falseness of the charges
> would
> be no defense; others saw how ludicrous they were, and you should
>
> reasonably have been able to see that as well. You have no way
> to
> defend
> yourself if I press charges; the incidents in the past don't
> ameliorate
> your actions here to any significant degree. Worse news; by openly
>
> soliciting Van Dee's help to take me down, you were fomenting
> a
> conspiracy. You only did that once in the open; for that one
> statement,
> you could receive ten years in a Federal pen, and a $100,000
> fine. Not
> a
> pretty thing to contemplate, is it?

> You also slandered me many times, by claiming I had abused my
> knowledge
> of the Web to harass ab-users illegally, engaged in witchhunts
> against
> you, and taught others to do the same. For that, I could sue
> for
> defamation of character with willful malice. You'd get to say
> goodbye
> to
> every penny you ever set aside; you'd lose the case, and all
> your
> holdings. You wouldn't even have the funds to defend against
> the felony
> charges; all your bank accounts would be frozen.

> In short, I have your life in my hands. Not Web pages; not an
> email
> inbox; not an ISP account; your whole life.

> But none of that has happened. This is the final proof of how
> wrong
> you've always been about me: I could destroy you utterly, and
> still
> haven't done it. Because it would do great harm to the BEA, I
> once
> again
> forebore to strike you down. I let you prance back into the BEA,
> and
> bask in the feeling of having ousted the Lord High Inquisitor;
> as far
> as
> anyone knows, he's dead. Even TransPonder is nowhere to be seen.
> Bubba
> is a pale imitation; the bugs are realizing it, and starting
> to
> proliferate. You're Captain Canuck, hero of the unjustly accused.
> Lucky
> you, you get to fight to save the bugs.

> Enjoy it... because the LHI is very much alive, and he could
> use the
> proofs of your actions anytime he wanted to. The statute of limitations
>
> for the felonies you committed is seven years; for that long,
> you get
> to
> live with the constant knowledge that you're still subject to
> that
> possibility. Consider it as your probation, and make sure it
> never has
> to be revoked. My patience for your antics has been exhausted;
> if you
> slip up badly this time, or ever again... I don't say a word.
> I walk
> into the local US Attorney's office; it's a five-minute drive.
> I show
> them the files I have, and watch them realize they're a perfect
> vehicle
> to get easy publicity. They need a case that proves they're not
>
> pursuing
> hackers just to be assholes; this is that case. They'll snap
> it up
> instantly. I know; one of my contacts works in that office, and
> he
> confirmed that they're looking for a case like mine right now.
> He
> practically begged me to give him my files.

> Aren't you glad I said "No"?

> I'm hoping you follow hockey, because there's a metaphor that
> should
> help you see how far afield you've gone. When two NHL players
> decide to
> fight, the referees let them have a good bash at each other,
> then sit
> them down to cool off. But if a third man enters the fray, he's
> taken
> out of it as swiftly as possible, and the punishment for his
> jumping in
> is severe. He gets a Game Major penalty, which cripples his team;
> he
> also comes under review by the League. If they determine his
> offense
> was
> blatant, he could even find himself banned from the game for
> life.

> By choosing to believe Van Dee's paranoid nonsense, you became
> the
> third
> man in. By continuing to reject obvious proof that there was
> no foul,
> you've made your situation blatant. By openly asking him to help
> you
> against me, you as much as mugged the ref. Whether I get any
> say in how
> the League rules on your offense is irrelevant; Owner has the
> resources
> to see the whole truth here, without any input from me.

> The entire series of posts is gone, so it's too late for you
> to go back
> and look for the pattern. All the proof you needed was there,
> but how
> you chose to read the threads made the difference in what you
> saw. If
> Van Dee had any real evidence that I had done any hacking, I'd
> already
> be under arrest. If MediaOne is any good at all, they could find
> such
> evidence if it existed. They won't, because it doesn't. I connected
> the
> two names without going anywhere near his personal information.
>

> Van Dee was stupid enough to use his real account name, and now
> he may
> get to learn why that's a dumb thing for a hatemonger to do.
> I have the
> proof, which I could easily use to convince MediaOne to shut
> off his
> account; he's added the admission that makes it ironclad. But
> that's
> not
> something I've ever had to do at the BEA before, and I'm not
> eager to
> do
> it now. I saw it done to someone when I did ISP tech. The charge
> was
> spurious, and I knew it; in the short time it took for me to
> bring
> forth
> the evidence the customer had already been cut off, and he decided
> to
> turn down a free account as the company's apology for jumping
> to the
> wrong conclusion. The person who leveled the false charge was
> dumped,
> and their account was marked with a tech-note: never reopen this
>
> account, or open any other in this person's name, for any reason.
> Their
> credit card number went into a hotlist of "No Accept"
> numbers; they
> won't be back there using it, no matter how many times they try.
>

> That's why I'm willing to warn people about the risk of being
>
> terminated, but loath to use the method. I've dealt with several
> cases
> like that, and every one was disgusting. Seeing some jerk use
> his
> account priveleges to heap indignity after outrage upon some
>
> undeserving
> soul was infuriating; the hassle involved in hammering such a
> jerk was
> enough to convince me it's only appropriate when all other methods
> have
> failed. Congratulations: you're the first at the BEA to get to
> that
> happy position. Choose your words and actions there carefully
> from now
> on, or you'll be lucky if all you get is bounced by Bubba.

> Sadly, you have an even worse line to walk. You chose to become
> Captain
> Canuck... and I intend to hold you to your word. You will be
> my
> conscience; if I ever have need for an outside review of an ugly
>
> situation, it will be dropped into your lap. You will come to
> see what
> a
> pleasure it is to wade throught a pile of filth looking for the
> facts;
> you might even come to a grudging respect for the things I go
> through
> on
> behalf of the BEA's visitors. There are several others defending
> the
> place, but none has the stomach to deal with the things I take
> on. Pray
> the new interface ends that shit, because otherwise you may get
> to see
> it up close next time.

> You state that you believe I hold a grudge against you; if I
> did, I
> could have pursued it anytime in the last five months. Just as
> I've
> been
> doing whenever someone steps over the line of common decency,
> I've told
> you repeatedly that you were out of line. Instead of paying any
> heed to
> those warnings, you interpreted them as personal attacks and
> responded
> in the same manner you thought I had chosen. By now you'd better
> know
> how wrong you were; if anyone holds a grudge here, that would
> be you.
> What little I had any reason to apologize for, I've already addressed;
>
> I've been doing the things expected of a Moderator at the BEA,
> and you
> have no grounds to complain about them. At most other websites
> with
> public Fora, you'd have been thrown out months ago.

> If this email doesn't convince you that you have plenty to be
> sorry
> for,
> you may gain unlimited time to reconsider your position. I suggest
> you
> start composing an apology now, while things like wardens and
> lockdowns
> aren't part of your daily routine. Your only other choice is
> to dare me
> to ruin your life, and I am certain I can do just that. The famous
> Fat
> Lady is all warmed up and ready to take the stage, and she's
> one BBW
> you
> won't like meeting at all. If you ever want to cruise the news
> again,
> make sure the curtain comes down before she gets a chance to
> sing the
> Underture.

> No snide sig here, because it would get in the way. Just the
> name I
> used
> to enjoy coming to the BEA under, and hope to one day enjoy going
> back
> to using all by itself with no need for dire warnings:
> TransPonder

> End of e-mail.

> Well, TransPonder, here you are in all your glory.

> I have said I have made my apologies and I will not make any
> more.
> Do what you have to do. Don't let your ego get in the way.
> (It is all really, thats at stake here, isn't it?)

>
</TEXTAREA></TD></TR><TR>
<TD COLSPAN=2 ALIGN=CENTER><HR WIDTH=50%>If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message, please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:</TD></TR><TR>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT>Optional Link URL:</TD><TD><INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME="url" SIZE=40 VALUE="http://"></TD></TR><TR>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT>Optional Link Title:</TD><TD><INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME="url_title" SIZE=40></TD></TR><TR>
<TD COLSPAN=2 ALIGN=CENTER><HR WIDTH=50%>If you'd like to include an image (picture) with your message, please provide the URL address of the image file:</TD></TR><TR>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT>Optional Image URL:</TD><TD><INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME="imageurl" SIZE=40 VALUE="http://"></TD></TR><TR>
<TD COLSPAN=2 ALIGN=CENTER><HR WIDTH=50%>If you'd like to have the option of deleting your post later, please provide a password (CASE SENSITIVE!):</TD></TR><TR>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT>Password:</TD><TD><INPUT TYPE=PASSWORD NAME="password" SIZE=40></TD></TR><TR>
<TD COLSPAN=2 ALIGN=CENTER><HR WIDTH=50%>If you'd like e-mail notification of responses, please check this box: <INPUT TYPE=CHECKBOX NAME="wantnotice" CHECKED VALUE="yes"></TD></TR><TR>
<TH COLSPAN=2><HR WIDTH=50%><INPUT TYPE=SUBMIT NAME="Preview" VALUE="Preview Message"> <INPUT TYPE=SUBMIT NAME="Post" VALUE="Post Message"></TH></TR></TABLE></CENTER></FORM>
<HR><CENTER>
<FORM METHOD=POST ACTION="http://www.bearchive.com/forum/index.cgi?delete">
<INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME="password" VALUE="">
<INPUT TYPE=HIDDEN NAME="message" VALUE="26927">
<INPUT TYPE=SUBMIT VALUE="Delete Message"> Password: <INPUT TYPE=PASSWORD NAME="newpassword" SIZE=15>
</FORM></CENTER>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<html>

<head>
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=iso-8859-1">
<title>Breast Expansion Archive - Pictures, videos, stories and art re

sheber · « **Reply #122 on:** June 09, 2003, 05:15:18 PM »

Oh, for crying out loud! When's dinner?

nick_caesar · « **Reply #123 on:** June 09, 2003, 05:20:31 PM »

Right... now! "Play it for me" .. da da da .. "Play it for me"...

BillN · « **Reply #124 on:** June 09, 2003, 05:32:03 PM »

I always thought the three outfielders were "Yesterday", "Today", and "Tomorrow".

Argyle · « **Reply #125 on:** June 09, 2003, 05:40:54 PM »

"DNA" stands for "Dames are Not Aggressive"

--Cliff Clavin

Kowalski · « **Reply #126 on:** June 09, 2003, 06:52:04 PM »

Uhh...

herman_the_german · « **Reply #127 on:** June 09, 2003, 07:26:24 PM »

Speaking of goats, Saturday I went to a Mexican First Communion, the caterers served goat stew with pinto beans, guacamole, fresh finely chopped onions and cilantro with a wedge of lime, hot tortillas and hot sauce. I have to admit, it wasn't bad.

The [censored] were running around all over the place, it was like a madhouse.

And then I found this Vogon Poetry Generator on line, here is a sample of the poetry that I helped create:

See, see the hook nosed sky
Marvel at its big polka dot puce depths.
Tell me, Mr. Particle do you
Wonder why the diseased wombat ignores you?
Why its foobly stare
makes you feel calambrical.
I can tell you, it is
Worried by your barkfluousted facial growth
That looks like
A cold beany weenie.
What's more, it knows
Your puck potting shed
Smells of a squished pea.
Everything under the big hook nosed sky
Asks why, why do you even bother?
You only charm snail viscerae.

Zorlond · « **Reply #129 on:** June 09, 2003, 08:36:29 PM »

Now I want to know what the hey 'barkfluousted' is...

rtpoe · « **Reply #130 on:** June 09, 2003, 09:04:31 PM »

And we like pizza, too.

rtpoe

largebreastfan · « **Reply #133 on:** June 09, 2003, 11:23:15 PM »

I like pizza best the next day, when you reheat it so its extra crispy. The guys at the shop can never get it quite right.

MunchWolf · « **Reply #134 on:** June 09, 2003, 11:24:10 PM »

oooh .. I had two questions:

1) Do fish have tongues?

2) When were marshmellows invented, by who, and how did he get the idea?

-Munch "too tired to ask jeeves" Wolf

btw: Cold pizza ROCKS !!!!!!

Re: Enigma

Re: There there

Re: Enigma