Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #480 on: July 01, 2003, 02:50:16 PM »
Quote:



hacker humour




"It's funny because it's true..."

Homer J. Simpson  
...Two men say they're Jesus, one of the must be wrong...

*

ninjrk

  • F Cup
  • 684
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #481 on: July 01, 2003, 04:11:57 PM »
Quote:

Hey Matt;

Just a follow-up, and to be truthful I'm not just asking because I'm interested in it for Keisha, iit's for someone else :>)

Where does one start looking for the name and contact info of a very reputable cosmetic surgeon in Mexico who might consider doing the string procedure?  

Kind regards

W





Best bet is to contact the Asociacion Mexicana de Cirugia Plastica through http://www.cirugiaplastica.org.mx/  They should have a membership listing along with what the different members specialize in.  see if they have listings of who does more experimental procedures as that should give you some names.  When you talk to the Surgeons refer them to Doc Johnson's two papers (available via Pubmed, I think) and see if they're interested.

Be prepared to pay, good surgeons will cost!  Make sure that the surgeon has experience with a variety of implants.  There are certainly crappy plastic surgeons in the US (most of them non-boarded) but the number goes up dramatically when you cross the southern border.

Matt  
Be nice to everyone you meet, but have a plan to kill them if you have to.

"the only thing unnatural about my tits is how fucking amazing they are!"  LOL

*

St Stephan

  • Moderator
  • 2682
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #482 on: July 01, 2003, 05:16:21 PM »
Keisha, you asked me for ideas about your photoshoots and videos and, as we agreed, it would be better here in the Forum where others can participate.

Starting with videos, I already referred you to another post which I won't repeat here (basically it just made the obvious but sometimes neglected point that movies should portray movement).  In any case, your body is very special and superbly adaptable to movies, in that your breasts are not only huge but very mobile.  So whatever actions you undertake, your breasts will move in sympathy - to the delight of most of us here, I'm sure. You are blessed with such a fantastic body that the camera angle is not of great importance: even from the rear we get a treat.  You've already demonstrated everything in this paragraph in the three short clips already available at your site.  (An aside while I'm thinking of camera angle: some worm's-eye views would be of great interest.)  

Of course your site is just beginning, so it's understandable that you have limited settings.  But I do hope you will have more varied settings in future, particularly outside shots (I'm very partial to forests and mountains myself).  Also I hope there will be some longer clips: 15-25 seconds is far too short a time to appreciate you.

Now, as to themes and costumes: practically anything will do, especially if you harken to the time-honored call of "take it off!" - yes, the good old strip tease is always a hit.  Also, movement is called for in all cases: one classic pose is hands on head, shoulders back, and guess what thrust out to be waved laterally - or vertically, pitch, roll, yaw, I don't care, just move them puppies.  Concerning specific attire, here are my preferences:
  • A sheer black negligee, VERY sheer: the movement of your breasts wobbling and pushing the cloth around will have a devastating effect.
  • Already requested, the ever-popular shiny black latex.  For more info about latex check out this site (reference from jaytas)
  • An alternative to full latex would be (in descending order of necessity): thigh-high boots, a waist cincher, bikini briefs, bikini halter, all in black latex or leather - something, in fact, similar to the attached illustration by Frosty, from your site (posted here by permission of Keisha Evans).  Normally this is accompanied by a whip, which I don't care much about, but it is more popular than a submachinegun (my preference, but too kinky for most, I'm sure).  
  • uniforms are popular: you've just done a military one, I'd like to see you as a cop, I bet others will picture you as a nurse. Then,  superheroines like Supergirl or Wonder Woman can be a hit.
  • a lot of people like corsets: a full corset with straps for sheer black stockings is classic and would be great on you - although I would prefer the waist-cincher cum thigh boots mentioned above (third item)
  • Worthy of mention, another classic, the wet T-shirt would be very good on you: the only case where white would be the color of choice.  As a rule, black is definitely your color.
OK, I could go on, but I'm sure other fans will have good ideas.

For photoshoots, all of the above would also be fine.  These outfits illustrate something I was trying to say in another now notorious thread, which I will carefully rephrase here:  Keisha, your breasts are indeed magnificent, and we all love to see them.  But they are part of the whole of you, and you and your photographer should not neglect the rest (IOW don't assume everyone is so ga-ga over your boobs that they can't appreciate other parts of your physique).  This is why I was railing against those unflattering gym shorts.

Of course, your human and intellectual qualities cannot come through in a photoshoot.  But I feel you could give a better inkling of them by more varied expressions and body language.  I'm not the only one to think this, I remember Christine Allure mentioning your ubiquitous smirk. Please try to vary your expression: laugh, frown, sneer, stick your tongue out, open your mouth with half-closed bedroom eyes. Let's see some of that spirit that comes out in your correspondence, woman (like, where's that "evil grin" you talk about?).  Or use imaginative props: for example, in that latest army set you could have been champing on a cigar for some of the shots.  If you take that latex option, for example, a sweet half-smile just won't do: we need a snarl to fit the bill. perhaps you'll see what I mean in this pilot pic (just a "serving suggestion"), combining some of the ideas above with an earlier idea for a new superheroine (me proposed name was "Major Mounds").




And on that note I'll turn this over to Keisha and other participants for their reactions and ideas.  But please remember: this thread is for Keisha: out of courtesy to her, let's keep it flame-free.  

0 ( ( o ! < J
   
Avatar with the gracious approval of the lovely Vanessa Montagne.
BEA members will find the full-sized (1.12 MB) animation,
cleansed of clumsy clowning claptrap by cloddish clerics, here.
For the original pictures, and thousands more, visit Vanessa.

*

D_U_S_K

  • Faye Faye
  • 1161
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #483 on: July 01, 2003, 05:23:35 PM »
BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS STEPHEN! I HOPE YOU ROT IN THE DEEP BOWELS OF HELL AND CANADA! I FART IN YOUR GENERAL DIRECTION!

Muwhahaha...Your flameproof thread is no more...muwhahahaha.



Anyhow, Im kidding, i didnt mean any of those things...or did i? Or maybe i didnt? Maybe i didnt mean to...but i did, but meaning to do so that i meant but not meant to do so. Ha!

On a side note, Keisha, Latex, Yum!
----
The End. No More. Goodbye.

-Jessica

*

Raiden

  • Vaio Parasite
  • 2020
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #484 on: July 01, 2003, 05:51:01 PM »
All the idea's sound nice....

except for one : "in that latest army set you could have been champing on a cigar for some of the shots".

Sorry just my opinon, but I just can't find a woman attractive witha cigar.  Reminds me too much of a 1920s gangster.  Just me I guess.  
...Don't touch me again...

*

jaytas

  • Good listener
  • 2537
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #485 on: July 01, 2003, 05:56:10 PM »
Erm. Ideas eh? Where to begin.

How about this one. You must have some old bras. Try one on and see what the effect is maybe.

Maybe an old white shirt that is already too tight, then straighten up and thrust those puppies out and take a deep breath to stretch it even more.

A tank top that does not quite cover the boobies and leaves the bottom of the mounds exposed.


*

Dick_Woods

  • X Cup
  • 1989
    • http://www.unlearnnow.com
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #486 on: July 01, 2003, 06:00:33 PM »
As far as latex goes....try this one....we have found it to be the best we've seen...but pricey http://www.demask.com/dynamic/index.asp they have a store in Manhattan...the only one they have in the U.S.A.. And this one is pretty good too....they make alot of thier own stuff ... http://www.purplepassion.com/ ...again...they have a nice store in Manhattan..... great staff.

Hope this helps...be careful though...you can go broke in these places.

Love and Light -D&J  

*

Tugboatcap

  • G Cup
  • 958
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #487 on: July 01, 2003, 09:53:12 PM »
She has HUGE TRACTS OF LAND!

Tugboatcap!
TugboatCap!
__________________________________________
It's Really Funny 'Till Someone Looses an Eye!

Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #488 on: July 02, 2003, 01:07:14 AM »
** ready with my type A & B fire extinguishers, just in case **  

 St. Stephen , you choice in outfits rock (I dig the   black thigh-high “fuck-me”   boots  too)

Lets see, uuhhmmm…what can I add?  

***Video***

 -cheerleading set, with all the jumping (raah! Raah! sis-boob-baah!)]
 
 -lotion, oils, and other such lubricants applied with laying back on the floor or bed]

 -St. Stephen’s wet T-shirt idea with a twist, we get to watch see was hing her car too]
 
 -I always would like to see a big-busted lady out in public (dressed hot, but respectable) and the reactions from others]

***Stills***
…at this time…”I got nothing” (thinking)

         
"All truth passes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Second it is violently opposed. Third it is accepted as being self-evident. - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
--------------------
My morphing toutorial:
http://www.geocities.com/digitaldevelopmenter/index2.html
--------------------

*

Tendrak

  • F Cup
  • 675
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #489 on: July 02, 2003, 03:02:27 AM »
Jeez, jaytas, I like the way you think!  
Breasts are like planets. The bigger they are the more they draw you in.

*

jaytas

  • Good listener
  • 2537
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #490 on: July 02, 2003, 03:16:03 AM »
My three ideas make you blush? Did not think they were all that daring. Just something that would place an emphasis on Keisha's forward facing cannons is all.  


*

Kanodin

  • Banned User
  • 1325
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #491 on: July 02, 2003, 04:09:21 AM »
Typically, when I read a thread, I think, "hmm, that's interesting."  Then, whatever the brouhaha is all about, I check it out and then do something else.  Occasionally, I see someone rooting about an issue or philosophical problem that needs addressing.  To whomever know me from my posts over the years, I come out of the woodwork, then return to it.  I mean, "hey, my time is valuable."  This thread is special.  I have never seen so many issues crop up in one subject (with the exception of the nine-eleven posts back in '01).

Here I go.  If you're impatient, skip my post.  I don't want people jerking me around with questions about a post they skimmed.

Signature Event Context
Ironically, Keisha was the closest one to uncovering the Derrida of this post.  Jacques Derrida, one of the most brilliant thinkers alive today (studying right down here at the University of California, Irvine; southern California's only claim to fame).  Derrida supported a rather wild proposition:

Quote:

 ...that linguistic meaning is fundamentally indeterminate because the contexts which fix meaning are never stable.




To delve deeper into the arguments would mean exposing the vagueness and equivocation of written language, through it's reproducability (someone else can utter it and thus alter it's context).  This fits well with Keisha's observation about how conversations on the Internet find themselves void of any inflections that aid spoken conversations.  If anyone needs to know more about this topic, I suggest attempting to find a study aid for the essay "Signature Event Context."  The translated essay is remarkably dry and difficult to comprehend.  Derrida basically compares at length the reproducability, iterability, permanence, and the potential for parisitism between written text and spoken speech.

Gender Bending? (yeah, what is that?)
Personally, I despise the pejorative notion of challenging someone to prove their sex.  To do this would place the burden of proof square on the shoulders of the accused by someone who can neither be seen nor heard.  To add insult to injury would ring to the tune of shifting to someone's inability to "take a joke properly," almost like we should just, in fact, not laugh, move on to the next thread, and ultimately be silent.  I attempt to make the largest effort to ultimately accept someone's gender identification, for that is an inalienable right.  At the same time, I consider someone's sex irrelevant to platonic relationships.  A request for more revealing garments (or lack of any garments) between a girl's (Keisha identifies as a 'girl') legs would suggest that someone isn't buying the illusion that they're loved by a sexual partner across a website.  If that was the original intention of St. Stephen, then we have seriously underestimated one of our moderators.  However, since the reason was claimed to be in the interest of 'humor,' either our moderator isn't able to clearly articulate his intentions, or simply missed the boat again and is posting is usual crude humor.

I said you are a bad person! (gasp)
To order a [censored] to a corner for time-out is one thing.  To order an adult the same in jest is one thing again.  To seriously say that to someone for saying "the wrong thing" is quite another.  I typically think learning constructively from our mistakes should be one of our most treasured methods of teaching.  There may have been abrasive comments, but that doesn't privilige us to admonish others for doing something "wrong."  Short of naming names (I said constructively), some of us would have a list of things that we should always do and things we should always not do.  To quote the play "Inherit the Wind"

 
Quote:

 One of the peculiar imbecilities of our time is the grid of morality we have placed on human behavior: so that every act of man (sic) must be measured against an arbitrary latitude of right and longitude of wrong--in exact minutes, seconds, and degrees!


   

*

jaytas

  • Good listener
  • 2537
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #492 on: July 02, 2003, 04:28:35 AM »
In todays cooking class we will take all the letters of this thread and make one huge pot of alphabet soup. To this we will add two dumplings and a sausage.

There. We have finished cooking. Please grab a bowl and a spoon, a slab of bread if you want and help yourselves. We have condiments on the tables to add salt and pepper to suit your requirements.

Bon apetite  


Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #493 on: July 02, 2003, 05:32:36 AM »
Hi,

I would appreciate a tape measuring scene. Since Lindsey Dawn McKenzie did this shots a few years ago I can't forget it.

Can you keep track of your measurements and cup sizes during your journey to bigger ones? If you are not too much in computing cup sizes some of us will help you for shure.

For movies:
Instead of yourself feeling up your body/breast with your hands, you have probably a friend that is willing to help.

Bye,
andrat2000
Anti-social behaviours lack consideration for the well-being of others. Any types of conduct that violates basic rights (human rights is one of them) of another person. It can show as covert or overt hostility.

*

MunchWolf

  • What Tagline?
  • 11463
Re: Keisha Evans megathread MERGED
« Reply #494 on: July 02, 2003, 06:10:45 AM »
hey kanodin .. read your post .. it uses lots of big word thingies ... good thing I got that degree-ish thinging ... let's me speak in big wordisms ...

Overall like your post ... the whole jab at sheber .. I dunno ... I thought it was funny what he did ... sure he could have sat down and shown TheDoc what he did wrong, "this is not a dictatorship, this is a democracy, now do as this ONE person ordered" (not an exact quote, but a general feel of what he said) ... but then there's the other angle where you can't really change people, and they don't like being told they are wrong or inappropriate ... so might as well mock them ...

Hmmm ... dunno ... anyway .. on an unrelated/related note  different languages use different parts of the brain ... so I wonder what part of the brain internet posting uses?

-Munch "and does this mean the next generation will be rewired differently celebrally?" Wolf