[Palomine]

I'm sure that there's already a thread along these lines someplace, but half a dozen attempts with the Search tool prove that it's still borked after all these many months of requested fixes. Thus, a new thread to discuss the idea of skinny-but-OK vs too-skinny subjects... here in OTF since some examples might be too too small for the General Forum.

I'm not personally a *major* fan of ultra-skinny gals since having that little body fat often comes at the cost of curves (which, to me, are feminine and appealing). However, as with most things, it's gotta be taken on a case-by-case basis. Here's what I'd consider skinny-but-OK per my own personal preferences. Yua Aida: barely looks like she'd tip the scales at 100 lbs., but with enough up top and nicely flaring hips to still push all the 'modern male mammal' buttons.

[sidewalkpsycho]

To me, this one would be rather "petite" than "skinny." No ribs showing, etc.

[MaxBigfoot]

I definitely do not find her too skinny.  She's babe-a-licious to me, in fact.   

[gwaang]

She's too skinny !? 

http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,153845.msg9991370.html#msg9991370

[onion_writer]

Not too skinny so far, though many models do go too far. Major rack plus a rib cage showing? Sure trips my trigger!

[luvdemwhoppers]

I think she's sweet, meat on the bone, not Twiggy......me gusta...

[Q_BE]

For which thread are you looking, my dear Palomine?

Is it this thread, labeled "too skinny?"

OR

Is it this thread, labeled "ultra slim and stacked"?

Q-"When i search the forum, I use my Google-Fu"-BE

[SamV]

Yeah, truthfulLee P,
I don't know what your problem is with the forum search function.  
Whenever I open the forum's search page, and enter keywords on the form that I think will lead me to whatever I'm looking for, it generalLee finds things pertaining to what I want.  

Sam "am I missing something here" V  

Pal responds: I've do at least a couple dozen searches a week, using keywords that I KNOW exist (in subject titles) and about a third of the time, the Search tool does NOT return the thread within results. I generally later confirm that the thread/keyword existed (and SHOULD have come up in results) by eventually finding it manually. The problem seems to be more pronounced when subject/title searches are used to delimit the results IME. The admins have known about this problem for at least a couple months, and there was one fix that improved things somewhat, but it's still an open/unresolved issue.

[pedonbio]

Ribs showing, but with plenty of good stuff, Marilyn Davis, a/k/a Marilyn Brown:

[ChrisR1]

I'm a fan of Danielle Derek's thinness - and of course here tits 

[Hoogleboogle]

The first girl was okay -- The others are too skinny for me.

[Palomine]

Here we have another example of 'skinny but certainly not *too* skinny' courtesy of Ms. Anna Kanzaki. Of course, this photo would also be suitably on-topic for any one of a number of other threads:

Small Breasts: http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,675449.0.html
Pubic Hair: http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,9979142.0.html
Areolas: http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,9977795.0.html

...and if we had one for foot fetishists, it'd be on-topic for that as well. Personally, it's a little difficult for me to determine whether she's most notable for her large, dusky areolas or for her interesting pubic fur, both of which attract even more than their fair share of attention on her petite little body.

[Palomine]

This pic (or versions of it) float around online a lot. GRIS not too much help in figuring out where it's from or who she is, but she's certainly skinny but (IMO) not too skinny.

wla12037 UnID gaunt med sauna nat bru solo ULd OTF skinny