[Lesbian Bob]

I don't know if this pic has appeared here before, but her bikini top and bottom don't match, meaning she's skinny and big:
 

[Maik]

I doubt that this is her real size, maybe morph.
Because the pic maybe taken at lunchtime, the shadows are very short.
At the size of her chest in this pic there can be no shadow.

Or maybe she has a very big head with a long chin, which is bigger as mentioned in this pic 

[Palomine]

I doubt that this is her real size, maybe morph.
Because the pic maybe taken at lunchtime, the shadows are very short.
At the size of her chest in this pic there can be no shadow.

Or maybe she has a very big head with a long chin, which is bigger as mentioned in this pic 

I don't see any obvious visual inconsistencies in the shadows.... the sun is almost directly above/slightly behind her, and the shadows cast by her head and chest look correct. I'm not saying the image isn't morphed (though I don't see any obvious signs of morphing) I'm just saying the shadows look OK. Regardless, she's very cute.

[gonZo]

There's a whole lot of jpeg compression in the image that tends to obscure signs of morphing, but I see a dark outline around the lower contour of the breast on our right as it passes in front of her forearm -- from about 3 o'clock to 5 o'clock on the edge of the breast-- that is darker and less blurry than similar transitions elsewhere in the image, and there's nothing in the lighting of the image to account for a dark, hard shadow right there. It could be mistaken for a result of edge-sharpening, but there's no edge sharpening elsewhere in the picture, so I think it's the product of an inaccurate selection in a morph.

But like Mulder, I want to believe.
_
g

attached: 2 larger, clearer versions found via GRIS. On the right, somebody applied Smart/Surface blurring only on the breasts, seemingly to obscure signs of morphing.

[Maik]

As an optimist i want to believe it too. That somewhere on the planet such girl exist,
or better cheerleader team of em.

[Maik]

I was restless and searched the i-net for a unmorphed version.
And found only a bigger one of this.
But now you can dev. see that something is not right with the lines around her top especially her left boobside and the wrong pixels around the neckholder and a pink pixel on her skin(   ) near the left neckholder.

[solvegas]

I was really hoping it was real and then you party poopers gotta analize it to death. Oh well .... 

[gonZo]

My apologies; it's a reflex for morphers. It occurred to me after I posted that we might be flattening people's fantasies...

[gOOber]

My apologies; it's a reflex for morphers. It occurred to me after I posted that we might be flattening people's fantasies...

I want to know if an image is morphed. I think it is pertinent information.

[gonZo]

Maybe it'll help everybody if I mention that if that's a blow-hers-up morph (as opposed to a donor morph), she probably had a fairly respectable rack to start with.

[pedonbio]

Bustybay identifies her as Candy Cole, but I can't find confirmation.

[vf1000ride]

I had found 6 photo's total of her.  All rather large up top but no names.  Will post as allowed.

[Ghost_Man]

Looking forward to a name on this

[Ooze3d]

Just my two cents:

As a boob lover I always want to know if a photo's morphed, the same way I want to know if a "busty" woman is actually squeezing a pair of B cups on a padded push-up bra to make them look like DD's. It just doesn't work for me if I know she doesn't really have those boobs, so I want to know so I can pay attention or move on to find one that's busty for real.

[tdotter]

Her name is Samantha Taylor.Just google "busty Samantha Taylor".

Mod edit: kudos on the ID tdotter! -Pal