Oh, I see what was done. This is just a list based on thread view count for a single thread dedicated to a specific individual. If one clicks on the Post/View tab the list resorts in ascending or descending counts.
I am curious that this ranking only counts the views for that person on their highest single view count thread?
Many women still have multiple threads and it would be interesting to argue that a lady with several moderately viewed threads might rank higher than a person with only one thread or a merged count.
My analysis of "favorite" BEA women took into account their entire presence on the BEA and individual users actual designation as their favorite, just for comparison.
It will be interesting how the front runner there will rank here. 
Yes, I did state how it worked in the first post of this thread.
As for ladies with several multiple threads... doubtful that this would impact much on the top 150 ladies by views. I have merged pretty much all threads down to around those at the 4000 views level and as the lowest number of views in the top 150 is actually around 70,000 at present, it would take a significant number of remaining lesser threads to make much of a difference. I suspect there are a few multiple threads floating around, but these will be with less than 4000 views.
The whole point of doing it is to see how much the positions change on a yearly basis. I will be doing it again next year, hopefully.
And although your analysis took into account people's favourites, I am pretty sure that there are MANY threads on the forum where people state their favourite model that you did not see which would siginficantly impact on your results. No analysis is ever perfect, but for me, the numbers tell a story all of their own.
I realise that most views does not always mean the most popular since people may view a thread just as much if they do not like the model, just to vent, but then I never said that my list was a measure of popularity, simply a list of most views accumulated.
I agree that in most cases of the lower ranked (by any measure) women there would not be sufficient page views of alternate threads to make enough of an impact. Yes, it might move them a place or two but not significantly.
I would however like to clarify that in my review, I actually harvested all names provided in "favorite" posts to generate a master list of names. This was a list of thousands of individuals. Then, using that huge list, I ran my point counts on all those names and stopped counting after the totals started to yield too many ties.
Yes, this was a much more laborious and inclusive method, however it avoided the whole problem you mention of people just visiting a single thread, even for a model or person they do not like or to vent. The problem of merged threads is that view counts are lumped and there is no easy mechanism to count total views other than sorting the master list. Women near the top of the list may actually have totals in other threads that would have significance. I still feel you are right about the basic assumption, it is just that you looked at about 21% of the BEA when you stopped at the 4000 view limit. Not, saying that is wrong however, just not as complete as I might have gone.
However, I see where you are coming from and this would be interesting to see any shifts over time.Personally, I do not like the raw view count approach of single threads as it paints a misleading picture.
I did touch on this over in my analysis of "BEA favorite" wherein I showed that even though Beshine has 22 thread pages to her name and one massively view mega thread, Nadine Jansen has an impressive 17 pages of threads with a collective total very close to Beshine.
The kicker was that Beshine was only the favorite of 1 user that I could find, Nadine was the top pick of 14 people!
It will be fun to see how this tally plays out.