*

Phoofy

  • C Cup
  • 349
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #285 on: May 20, 2006, 12:00:22 PM »
Here's one!

I was tempted to post 2, but that would be breaking the law -- the law of smut.  And the smut police would come after me and yell at me and delete my posts.

So I'm posting only one!

*

ThisIsNotMyName

  • The Circle Squared
  • 739
  • Or is it???
    • BEhavior
Mammary Lane Closed for Constriction
« Reply #286 on: May 20, 2006, 04:40:07 PM »
Quote:

And the smut police would come after me and yell at me and delete my posts.


Actually...
Thou hast already transgressed mightily, recently enough to still be trackable...

So it's more likely they'd smite you with the Big Stick of Bannnation.
If you're lucky it would only hurt for a month or so.

But they sure were nice pix while they lasted! Yes, we have no bananas, we have no bananas todayyyyy! But you shoulda been here yestiddy.

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #287 on: May 20, 2006, 04:49:11 PM »
Phoofy, I have to ask: Are you Phoofy The Scanner, He who makes life more tolerable?
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

Phoofy

  • C Cup
  • 349
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #288 on: May 21, 2006, 10:56:29 AM »
Quote:

Phoofy, I have to ask: Are you Phoofy The Scanner, He who makes life more tolerable?




I make everything more tolerable!

See!  Here's another post!

Again, your posts ARE welcome, but surely you can't expect us to allow you to violate the terms of your user agreement while everyone else must obey those same rules. Please READ the rules so that you know WHAT not to do. Thanks.  

*

Phoofy

  • C Cup
  • 349
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #289 on: May 21, 2006, 12:10:06 PM »
Quote:

Quote:

Phoofy, I have to ask: Are you Phoofy The Scanner, He who makes life more tolerable?




I make everything more tolerable!

See!  Here's another post!

Again, your posts ARE welcome, but surely you can't expect us to allow you to violate the terms of your user agreement while everyone else must obey those same rules. Please READ the rules so that you know WHAT not to do. Thanks.  
 




It's nice to feel welcome!

btw--did you delete my post of Arlene Bell because it is copyrighted material (Score?) or because it is [censored] porn?

Seems like I'm not the only one who has to READ the rules!

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #290 on: May 21, 2006, 12:46:26 PM »
 
Quote:

 It's nice to feel welcome!

btw--did you delete my post of Arlene Bell because it is copyrighted material (Score?) or because it is [censored] porn?

Seems like I'm not the only one who has to READ the rules!
 


  Oh my! This isn`t going to end well.
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

turbo

  • Z Cup
  • 3290
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #291 on: May 21, 2006, 01:05:38 PM »
Phoofy,

You are quite welcome to join us at the BEA but your Arlene Bell posts ran afoul of the following:

1. The 1-1-1-1 Rule: you may post/attach/link only ONE IMAGE PER USER PER THREAD PER ANY 24-HOUR PERIOD effective as of 1 March 2004.
However:

* Forum users posting images to which they alone own the legal copyright may post as many images as they like, including models posting images of themselves, wholly original works of art (not morphs), and photographers posting their own copyrighted images. Please bear in mind that the User/Member Gallery (and not the forum) is the area of this site intended for posting large numbers of images. Please remember that image posts must be on-topic and if a poster owns the copyright to an image, they MUST say so when posting (i.e.: "(C) ImageOwnerName"); Misrepresentation of copyright ownership is prohibited.


All BEA users, when first registering, agree to follow the forum rules and that 's the way it is around here.
---------- "I will be acquitted and vindicated when the truth is told." Michael Jackson before the trial------------
---------- "Justice was done. He was always innocent and we proved it." Thomas Mesereau after the trial-------

*

foon4Balloons

  • F Cup
  • 617
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #292 on: May 21, 2006, 02:19:47 PM »
Got Phoofy?


*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #293 on: May 21, 2006, 04:11:48 PM »
Quote:

 
Quote:

 It's nice to feel welcome!

btw--did you delete my post of Arlene Bell because it is copyrighted material (Score?) or because it is [censored] porn?

Seems like I'm not the only one who has to READ the rules!
 


  Oh my! This isn`t going to end well.




Guys, please, please, please: I want this to continue long and end well. Whenever the slavemasters allow me a few moments on the computer to myself, I go to alt.binaries.pinups, and some days the only good things posted there are Phoofy's high-res scans. Phoofy manages to dig up shots of vintage models that, to my best knowledge, were never published. Most of his scans are too hi-res to post here (There is a 156kb limit), but Phoofy would make a wonderful member of our community.

Phoofy, I have difficulty keeping up with the rules, too, so I err on the side of limiting my posts. Basically, if it has a copyright mark, I don't post it. The 1-1-1-1 rule is easy to follow; I once violated it by posting three shots of different models (the limit is per poster, not per model), but tomorrow is always another day and another post.

So tell me, where do you get your new shots?
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

gonZo

  • pain in the ass moderator
  • 9718
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #294 on: May 21, 2006, 05:34:15 PM »
To echo pedonbio...  In case anybody here is getting a contrary impression, Phoofy is a good guy and world-class scanner of very long standing.  After years of being begged to post more on UseNet, I'm sure he's unaccustomed to being told not to post as much, so I hope he'll be given a chance to acclimate.  Phoofy would be a great contributor to this board.

gonZo
(delurking when necessary)

*

ThisIsNotMyName

  • The Circle Squared
  • 739
  • Or is it???
    • BEhavior
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #295 on: May 22, 2006, 02:01:23 AM »
Quote:

After years of being begged to post more on UseNet, I'm sure he's unaccustomed to being told not to post as much, so I hope he'll be given a chance to acclimate.


Or perhaps the two he just got. Here's hoping he won't need a third... This trend toward toleration is becoming intolerable.
Quote:

gonZo
(delurking when necessary)


Back in the box, you. Muppetry bas been prohibited for the duration. We know all about your subversive, terroristical ways. You and those damn Smurfs are both going down for the count!!Well, at least the Street Gang isn't French.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #296 on: May 22, 2006, 09:43:04 AM »
 Phoofy,

I MEAN it when I say your posts are welcome... NOT just because AB is one of my personal faves (of course) and not just because of your reputation (I'm also a longtime fan of the pinups NG and have appreciated all your work) but because you are as welcome as anyone else here... this is a decade-old community of like minded enthusiasts.

I removed your post above due to the 1-1-1-1 rule... users posting again to the same thread must wait til 24 hrs of site time have elapsed before posting again to that thread. It's all explained in the terms of the user agreement (site rules, also linked in my sig file) and exists for a number of reasons, but mostly because the Owner of this site (who bears all the liability for what gets posted here) wants them to. I did not know anything you've posted thus far to belong to any of the prohibited sources (on the rule list also)... thus it was just 1-1-1-1 that was relevant. of course, if you know an image to be on the prohibited source/model list please don't upload/link it, even if the copyright notice has been cropped off or obscured.

Just read the rules (the are updated once in a while, but a single read-through will stand you in good stead) and enjoy yourself here among us fellow fans of glorious feminine pulchritude. I've dug through my stash to locate an AB pic (attached) that I haven't seen in a while, on the VERY remote chance I can provide YOU with something you don't already have.

Take care.  

*

gonZo

  • pain in the ass moderator
  • 9718
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #297 on: May 22, 2006, 01:27:41 PM »
<salutatory nerf-snarking>


WellWhatIsYourFuckingNameThen? wrote:

"Or perhaps the two he just got. Here's hoping he won't need a third..."
Well --Snartacus, is it?-- here's hoping he didn't give up after his last post was taken down.  I don't think he understood the problem with that one.

"Back in the box, you.
"Back in box"?  "Back in box"??!!  This isn't Señor frigging Wences.

Muppetry bas been prohibited for the duration.
Wake up and smell the felt, bub: Muppets roll with Frosty Walt and The Big Mouse now.

We know all about your subversive, terroristical ways.
That's "perversive" and "erroristical".

You and those damn Smurfs are both going down for the count!!"
Nonsense.  Anybody on Sesame Street will tell you that The Count doesn't even have genitalia.


BTW, Judge Dredd wants his personality back.  

</salutatory nerf-snarking>


gonZo
(wildlife imitating art)

(ps: You wouldn't happen to have archived BEhavior v2n5, would you?)

*

Phoofy

  • C Cup
  • 349
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #298 on: May 22, 2006, 01:33:20 PM »
Quote:

 
Quote:

 It's nice to feel welcome!

btw--did you delete my post of Arlene Bell because it is copyrighted material (Score?) or because it is [censored] porn?

Seems like I'm not the only one who has to READ the rules!
 


  Oh my! This isn`t going to end well.




If you had bothered to check the dates, you would have noticed that the posts were on separate days...

Got optometrist?

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Down Mammary Lane
« Reply #299 on: May 22, 2006, 01:39:39 PM »
Quote:


If you had bothered to check the dates, you would have noticed that the posts were on separate days...

Got optometrist?




I think goober was referring (melodramatically) to the fact that it's not separate dates that count, but that no two pics (from the same user) appear within 24 hrs. of each other. I've edited the rules again in an attempt to make this a bit more clear. Many of us who've been here WAY too long ( ) already know the rules by heart... no so much from reading them I suspect, but rather from seeing them enforced. Sometimes we all forget (myself included) that new friends aren't as familiar with them as we've become, that's all.

As it happens, this particular thread is FILLED with BEA 'old-timers' (though some prefer to use 'new' names ) ...many of us also haunt the NGs and participated on Anthony's FTP site too. Which explains I suppose why all of us in this particular demographic are so fond of the natural, retro models throughout this thread.

Again Phoofy: I'm glad you're here... a feeling that's shared by many others too I'm certain.