[pilotblaze]

Have they tried treating your ulcerative c. with nicotine?

In my case, no - the stuff I'm using is working, and my doctors didn't want to mess with success... ;-)

Have you heard of good success with that?  I wouldn't mind checking out some research and results info...

BTW, I don't want to hijack this thread with unhappy stuff - I'm OK to switch to PM's..

Thanks for asking.
-D'Artagnian

[TheZookie007]

I for one am interested in this, and besides, if it ever gets too heavy, one good picture can bring us back to copaseticity...

[gonZo]

In my case, no - the stuff I'm using is working, and my doctors didn't want to mess with success... ;-)

Have you heard of good success with that?  I wouldn't mind checking out some research and results info...

BTW, I don't want to hijack this thread with unhappy stuff - I'm OK to switch to PM's..

Thanks for asking.
-D'Artagnian

No, I was reading about nicotine (while thinking about trying vapor cigarettes) (because I've missed smoking every damn day since I quit 10 years ago) and it was mentioned as an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis. The side effects (vasoconstriction, increased blood pressure) rule it out for people at risk for cardiovascular disease, though.

[jayjay88]

I've always liked Wendy's looks...she is a natural beauty.
I've just read her blog and am struck by how open and
genuine she is.  And she is obviously articulate.  Turning
30 for a woman is often a time of reflection, and for a
model of any type no doubt generates a 'how long can I
go on like this?'.  A serious health issue is another matter
altogether.  She definitely needs to sort that out above
all else.  I wish her well!

[zeo]

Initially I was thinking 85K/month gross.  85K gross is roughly 3500 regular subscribers averaging a few cents less than the month to month rate.

85k/month does seem way too high for net, but I would think she would have more than 3500 subscribers in any given month.

Then again, $300/yr is a lot for pixels on a screen.

The 85k/month number is probably simply made up.

[DJPFC]

Initially I was thinking 85K/month gross.  85K gross is roughly 3500 regular subscribers averaging a few cents less than the month to month rate.

85k/month does seem way too high for net, but I would think she would have more than 3500 subscribers in any given month.

Then again, $300/yr is a lot for pixels on a screen.

The 85k/month number is probably simply made up.

I can tell you without equivocation that number is way, way, WAY too high.  We run several model sites for several of our models, so we have a lot of experience with this and know exactly how much revenue those kinds of sites usually make.  Keep in mind that she also has no nudity on hers, which lowers revenues even more.

Think more along the lines of 1/10th of $85,000... and if you do, you will be thinking very, very optimistically.

[Ivy Violet]

I just discovered her! She's amazing looking. And so friendly! Shame she's having trouble.

[zeo]

Think more along the lines of 1/10th of $85,000... and if you do, you will be thinking very, very optimistically.

Gross or net?

[Rad]

Looks like she's having fun in Belize from her twitter. 

[Rentahero]

Initially I was thinking 85K/month gross.  85K gross is roughly 3500 regular subscribers averaging a few cents less than the month to month rate.

85k/month does seem way too high for net, but I would think she would have more than 3500 subscribers in any given month.

Then again, $300/yr is a lot for pixels on a screen.

The 85k/month number is probably simply made up.

I highly, highly doubt she has 3500 subscribers.  350 subscribers seems more likely given how many show up for video chat.

Meanwhile, a thread for a new set appearing on a certain site may receive 35,000 views/downloads.  The sad truth is Wendy and company may not even be making the most money from her material.

[MarvinMartian]

I can tell you without equivocation that number is way, way, WAY too high.  We run several model sites for several of our models, so we have a lot of experience with this and know exactly how much revenue those kinds of sites usually make.  Keep in mind that she also has no nudity on hers, which lowers revenues even more.

Think more along the lines of 1/10th of $85,000... and if you do, you will be thinking very, very optimistically.

Would it be fair to say that the websites offer supplemental income instead of primary?

[DJPFC]

Would it be fair to say that the websites offer supplemental income instead of primary?

Yes, for most models that's exactly what they are.  It can be very good, steady supplemental income, but that $85,000 a month number is ludicrous.

[TheZookie007]

I highly, highly doubt she has 3500 subscribers.  350 subscribers seems more likely given how many show up for video chat.

The variant of Pareto's Law known as the 90:9:1 rule explains that.

[MarvinMartian]

Yes, for most models that's exactly what they are.  It can be very good, steady supplemental income, but that $85,000 a month number is ludicrous.

That's really kind of sad.  I may just sign up to at least contribute money for her health problems.

[jimmarg]

^ Which is why even a super-super-star like Chelsea Charms is in a hotel room doing personal sessions as I type.