[DruulEmpire]

I love how the frames are outrageously big -- sort of thematic.

V to 'pusher below: yeah, I felt a little sorry for how her bust could not be contained under that gray sweater -- but only a little.

[solvegas]

I love how the frames are outrageously big -- sort of thematic.

Yes, the eyeglasses really do compliment her. There is a thread around about big boob geek girls and she fills the bill to a T. I really do hope she would wear a bikini with those glasses. 

[Pixelpusher]

Yup, Beshine looks very sexy with glasses. She looks very yummy in this set.
The only thing I don't like is the fact that it will soon be frickin cold in Germany and she will wear more and more in her diaries, lol. 

[logos]

This pic is a peace of art.
Shows her stunning beauty and the glasses are just to make it perfect.
One of the best pic I have seen of her.

[kafizwa]

This pic is a peace of art.
Shows her stunning beauty and the glasses are just to make it perfect.
One of the best pic I have seen of her.

Oh, yes! You're right! This is what one calls a stunning beauty. And in the last pics shooted from the side i actually realized what a perfect ass beshine has. I was only focused to her boobs yet, but now i'm obsessed with her huge boobs, the idea that they will grow further and her tiny, perfect looking ass!
Beshine, if i could make a wish, i wished that your next set to shoot is a topless set in a tiny little micro g - string, shoot from behind, where one sees your boobies hanging to the left and the right and you're looking over your shoulders wearing that amazing pair of glasses!

[6Foot6]

Loving the new Beshine pics,

Beshine looks magnificent and her boobs are stunning...

Cant wait for the next Fill Up and Booty Implants...

The future is bright for Beshine 

Thank you for sharing with us all

.........(     .     )(     .     )...........

[RHIC]

A note about 'fisheye' -

This is the FOV, or Field of View (sometimes Frame of View).  I don't have a 'prime' (fixed) main lens, I have a zoom lens, and when you zoom all the way out, you will get a mild form of 'fisheye' from the greater FOV.  This will account for size differences in many instances, especially regarding things closer to the lens.  See here for the wiki explanation:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_view#Focal_length

So mostly, this is just an artistic choice, though I find it somewhat maddening when used in model shoots because I like the subject to be all in proportion, relatively speaking.

[Palomine]

So mostly, this is just an artistic choice, though I find it somewhat maddening when used in model shoots because I like the subject to be all in proportion, relatively speaking.

Oh, how I agree with you!

Which is not to say I don't appreciate models with outlandish proportions: I most certainly do! It's just that I want to see those proportions as they actually are, not distorted optically for an extra boost. IMO, blatant overuse of optical distortion in that manner, whether acknowledged/admitted or not, is really no different than content producers morphing photos and then passing them off as unmorphed. Is it a crime, or will it mean then end of western civilization? Of course not. However, it crosses the line (delineating suspension of disbelief) and frankly, it makes me feel manipulated as a viewer (when obvious distortions are repeatedly denied, especially when they're also unecessary)... so much so, that I lose interest in such content, no matter how pretty and bodacious the women pictured actually are.

Honestly, I think plenty of adult content consumers don't know optical distortion or even most morphs if they see blatant examples (what we'd regard as obvious). Thus, content producers can utilize such techniques ad nauseum (the ironically named 'Extreme Naturals" is one such example: passing off morphs as 'natural' despite the fact that they're so badly morphed that Stevie Wonder would know) to make their models/content more appealing to potential customers. While they may alienate/lose/never get some other potential customers because of these practices (i.e.: guys who don't like being lied to, or who object to such needless 'enhancement', etc...) that number is probably dwarfed by however many buyers they think they're attracting thanks to the distortion.

Thus, like all things, it's basically a business decision: an effort to increase income.
 

[Djoser]

I agree with the previous fellas: sure using fish eye elnses from time to time isn't bad, what i don't like is when they abuse from it hehe. I don't have complains regarding beshine's stuff tho...not so far.

[Dr_Fashizzle]

Don't astronomers call this "gravitational lensing"?

Now THAT, I'll buy!!!  

Also, i just happened across this article illustrating lenses and focal length:

gizmodo.com/5857279/this-is-how-lenses-beautify-or-uglify-your-pretty-face

[tivodan1116]

and another one.. hope you like!

xoxo beshine 

PS: i love this pink jeans

Does anyone see jeans in this picture?  I sure as hell don't.

[cebe]

Once again I had a dream : a few weeks later...

[AgentDee]

makes for a GREAT avatar

[Mr Benchpress]

Once again I had a dream : a few weeks later...

Amazing! No way she's going to pull that top down!

[Djoser]

Those must be so heavy...i think those would be way bigger than most of us think...maybe 70 000 ccs