*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83839
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4950 on: December 06, 2025, 08:57:21 PM »
She looks good in stripes  ;D

I suspect some photoshop humbuggery in the background. I don't see any obvious sign that she's been morphed, though. (Whatever happened to "The Fake Detective," from back in the usenet days?)
Yep, stripes definitely look good on her. Posted on December 05, 2025, Reply #4945 by Robin_K2. I got rid of the two guys in the picture. I also adjusted the color and sharpened her face in Photoshop.

You most definitely improved that photo by removing those guys. Fact is, quite often, the presence of men spoils the sight/view of the image. Men are naturally ugly beings.  ;)

*

dolt

  • B Cup
  • 378
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4951 on: December 06, 2025, 10:11:04 PM »
The same image that was posted by mariomantwo some days ago, but in bigger original size. In an earlier image she had an electric guitar in the background, and now there appears to be a violin style electric bass? I think the Beatles used instruments of this style at some point.

That could definitely be a Hofner-style bass.

*

Robin_K2

  • A Cup
  • 3438
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4952 on: December 07, 2025, 09:08:25 AM »
It's like a big black arrow  :D

*

Robin_K2

  • A Cup
  • 3438
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4953 on: December 11, 2025, 06:37:42 AM »
grainy pic, but it is what it is

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83839
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4954 on: December 11, 2025, 08:09:34 AM »
Per salem, she is still #3 of the top 150 views thread.  :)

*

NavSquid

  • 1151
    • DeviantArt
    • Email
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4955 on: December 11, 2025, 08:51:48 AM »
She looks good in stripes  ;D

I suspect some photoshop humbuggery in the background. I don't see any obvious sign that she's been morphed, though. (Whatever happened to "The Fake Detective," from back in the usenet days?)
Yep, stripes definitely look good on her. Posted on December 05, 2025, Reply #4945 by Robin_K2. I got rid of the two guys in the picture. I also adjusted the color and sharpened her face in Photoshop.

You most definitely improved that photo by removing those guys. Fact is, quite often, the presence of men spoils the sight/view of the image. Men are naturally ugly beings.  ;)
I agree. 👍

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83839
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4956 on: December 11, 2025, 09:37:14 AM »
She looks good in stripes  ;D

I suspect some photoshop humbuggery in the background. I don't see any obvious sign that she's been morphed, though. (Whatever happened to "The Fake Detective," from back in the usenet days?)
Yep, stripes definitely look good on her. Posted on December 05, 2025, Reply #4945 by Robin_K2. I got rid of the two guys in the picture. I also adjusted the color and sharpened her face in Photoshop.

You most definitely improved that photo by removing those guys. Fact is, quite often, the presence of men spoils the sight/view of the image. Men are naturally ugly beings.  ;)
I agree. 👍

I'm glad you did.  ;D

*

mariomantwo

  • A Cup
  • 531
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4957 on: December 13, 2025, 10:58:53 PM »
Happy Early Christmas!

*

titorteat

  • A Cup
  • 1352
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4958 on: December 14, 2025, 07:24:33 AM »
Happy Early Christmas!

Nancy isn't exactly hiding her curves by tucking her shirt into such a high-waisted skirt, and the younger woman is showing quite a bit of cleavage under her sheer top. Maybe the ladies will try to one-upp each other by wearing more and more breast-accentuating attires every time they meet... 😁
|titor|

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83839
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4959 on: December 14, 2025, 08:10:51 AM »
Happy Early Christmas!

Nancy isn't exactly hiding her curves by tucking her shirt into such a high-waisted skirt, and the younger woman is showing quite a bit of cleavage under her sheer top. Maybe the ladies will try to one-upp each other by wearing more and more breast-accentuating attires every time they meet... 😁

All three women are nicely endowed.  :)

*

NavSquid

  • 1151
    • DeviantArt
    • Email
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4960 on: December 14, 2025, 09:31:52 AM »
Very nice! ;D Posted on December 13, 2025, Reply #4957 by mariomantwo . I brightened the image, adjusted the color and sharpened her face.

*

mariomantwo

  • A Cup
  • 531
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4961 on: December 14, 2025, 01:51:45 PM »
Nancy isn't exactly hiding her curves by tucking her shirt into such a high-waisted skirt

I think we know by now that she loves to show off her investments. It’s just the inappropriate comments she doesn’t tolerate.

General compliments are welcome, they can even go slightly into spicy territory if done right, but once people start getting detailed about her size, with zero subtlety, and using the t-word, for all her friends and family on social media to see, that’s what crosses the line and forces her to private her accounts.

Not to mention the creepy DMs she’s no doubt received.

*

Robin_K2

  • A Cup
  • 3438
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4962 on: December 16, 2025, 07:19:45 AM »
She's ruined my quick coffee forever, because supposedly she's K-cup  ;)

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83839
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4963 on: December 16, 2025, 07:25:29 AM »
She's ruined my quick coffee forever, because supposedly she's K-cup  ;)

Never thought of that.  ;) ;D

*

titorteat

  • A Cup
  • 1352
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #4964 on: December 16, 2025, 07:47:17 AM »
Nancy isn't exactly hiding her curves by tucking her shirt into such a high-waisted skirt

I think we know by now that she loves to show off her investments. It’s just the inappropriate comments she doesn’t tolerate.

General compliments are welcome, they can even go slightly into spicy territory if done right, but once people start getting detailed about her size, with zero subtlety, and using the t-word, for all her friends and family on social media to see, that’s what crosses the line and forces her to private her accounts.

Not to mention the creepy DMs she’s no doubt received.

I don't really understand people commenting explicitly on such things directly on non-models' profiles. DMs aside, suppose it could be that the comments are directed more towards other admirers, rather than the pretty women themselves. Better to discuss the ladies' beauty and sartorial choices on sites like this one.
|titor|