Let me share with you liberals out there a few more points of contention I share with the American people about our dear Supreme Leader Messiah, Barack Hussein Obama. (Mmmm Mmmm Mmmm!)
It appears that Obama has done a flip-flop on "Blue Ribbon Commissions".
This is what he said September 16, 2008 in Golden, Colorado during the Presidential campaign:
Obama dismisses McCain 'commission' as stuntThis morning, instead of offering up concrete plans to solve these issues, Senator McCain offered up the oldest Washington stunt in the book: You pass the buck to a commission to study the problem. (laughter) Here's the thing. This isn't 9/11. We know how we got into this mess. What we need now is leadership that gets us out. (cheers and applause) I'll provide it, John McCain won't, and that's the choice for Americans in this election.
This is Barack Hussein Obama last Thursday:
Obama Creates Bipartisan Fiscal Panel to Tackle DebtAlan Simpson and Erskine Bowles are taking on the impossible. They're going to try to restore reason to the fiscal debate and come up with answers as cochairs of the new National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. I'm asking them to produce clear recommendations on how to cover the costs of all federal programs by 2015 and to meaningfully improve our long-term fiscal picture.
Oldest Washington stunt in the book, eh?
The global warming hoax is vanishing before your very eyes and ears:
Scientist Retracts Paper on Rising Sea Levels Due to ErrorsScientists have been forced to retract a paper that claimed sea level were rising thanks to the effects of global warming, after mistakes were discovered that undermined the results.
The study was published in Nature Geoscience and predicted that sea levels would rise by as much as 2.7 feet by the end of the twenty-first century.
The paper also highlighted that it reinforced the conclusions of the U.N.'s controversial Fourth Assessment report, which warned of the dangerous of man-made climate change.
However, mistakes in time intervals and inaccurately applied statistics have forced the authors to retract their paper -- the first official retraction ever for the three-year-old journal, notes the Guardian. In an officially published retraction of their paper, the authors acknowledged these mistakes as factors that compromised the results.
"We no longer have confidence in our projections for the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and for this reason the authors retract the results pertaining to sea-level rise after 1900," wrote authors Mark Siddall, Thomas Stocker and Peter Clark.
Barack Hussein Obama said this about sea levels on his Election Day 2008 victory:
I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.
Not only has Barack Obama NOT done anything to stop sea levels from rising (even accepting the blatantly false premise that the
yet-future "Cap-and-Tax" bill would do anything remotely substantive), the sea levels weren't even rising in the first place! It was a complete hoax and lie from start to finish!
Finally, I would like Obama to consider the political hypocrisy of his speeches and his policies so far:
1.) Obama said that jobs was his main priority, but his healthcare reform, retaining a public option or even expanding Medicare to 55-and-overs (while also miraculously cutting $500 billion from the program) will kill the private insurance industry, costing tens of thousands of jobs. How do you reconcile that?
2.) Obama pledged dozens of times that he would never raise taxes on families making $250,000 or more a year, but Obamacare places taxes on "Cadillac insurance plans" among other things, set to start the very next year after it is enacted (2011 currently). How do you reconcile that?
3.) Obama himself has said we're out of money, and we need to rein in spending (by 2015), but he's going forward with at least a $1 Trillion healthcare reform package on top of all the previous spending and not 4 DAYS after he appointed a "commission" to figure out how we get out of debt, a commission that he himself decried as "the oldest Washington trick in the book". How do you reconcile that?
4.) Obama said that if his "Porkculus" bill was passed in 2009, we wouldn't see an increase over 8% in unemployment figures. He said it would create 3.5 million jobs,
over 90% of which in the private sector, but we've lost millions of jobs, and a fellow Democrat, Evan Bayh (D-Indiana), said he believed that the stimulus bill "has not created one job in the last 6 months". How do you reconcile that?
5.) Obama pledged that he "didn't want to run the automobile industry", but the US Government (along with the UAW) now owns operating stakes in two American auto companies. How do you reconcile that?
6.) Obama said his personality and his new methods of engaging Iran "without preconditions" would keep them from becoming a nuclear power, but since then Iran has admitted to undiscovered nuclear facilities, and the good ol' United Nations even admits they are surprisingly pursuing further nuclear enrichment. How do you reconcile that?
7.) As I stated above, Obama claimed his election would cause the sea levels to fall, and jobs to be created, and Washingtonian gridlock would end (well, I added that last one, given the Democrats had supermajorities in both houses of Congress and the presidency). None of these things has happened, and in fact, the sea levels were never rising in the first place. How do you reconcile that?
8.) I stated above in a previous post that Obama blames Bush for horrific deficit spending, but Obama's own budgets triple the national debt by the time he leaves office in 2012 (hopefully). On top of that, he voted for EVERY PIECE of spending legislation Bush threw down the pike, the same legislation he now blames for so many deficits, which in each of the years he plans to be in office were or will be triple the largest deficit in Bush's final year ($500 billion versus $1.5 trillion+). How do you reconcile that?
...
...
...
How's that hope and change working for you?
Q-"
2010 = Democrats' End"-BE