1. Does anyone believe Russia helped Trump win the primaries?
No, the Russian interference started AFTER Trump had clinched the nomination.
He beat 16 other candidates all on his own. Okay, check.
2. Did Hillary Clinton win the primaries FAIR and SQUARE?
Yes, and irrelevant. She's not the president.
This is not true. It has already been covered how the DNC sabotaged Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary. Wikileaks
proved it. Not my opinion. And who is to say if its relevant or not, you? Set a standard, practice what you accuse others of doing.
3. What is the difference between what is being alleged Russia did in the elections to what CNN actually did?
Russia is a rival foreign government.
I think you meant to say country. Wow, how obvious though huh? Russia is a country and CNN is a corporation. But I wasnt asking a 3rd grader this question. The difference is that CNN, who claims to be unbiased, had clear motives and an agenda.
Its been proven CNN favored Hillary and the dissemination of information.... CNN was in collusion with the DNC.
There is proof of CNN's involvement and ZERO proof of Russias.
4. How many countries's elections has the United States meddled in?
Irrelevant.
It is irrelevant to you because it doesnt make your argument look any better.
The answer is, and I will guesstimate, over 20 countries.
5. Has there been any evidence proving Russia "hacked" the elections?
No, because they didn't "hack" the elections. It's not the actual voting process that is believed to have been interfered with, but the dissemination of information detrimental to the Democrats with the collusion of the Republicans during the months between the conventions and the election itself that's the issue.
Yeah, no actual proof of Russia interfering at all. And its been months.. Where is bernie sanders to come out and say "we are sick and tired hearing about those damn Russia allegations!"?
6. Why does the Russia allegations hold ground but nothing that goes against Democrats hold any ground? Is the simple rule to follow: conspiracies against Trump, good... conspiracies against democrats, bad?
So far, all the Democratic "conspiracies" have been investigated and found to be bogus. No, there wasn't a secret sex ring operating out of the basement of a pizza parlor. The attack on the Benghazi consulate was not an attempt to let Ambassador Stevens get k'dnapped so he could then be exchanged for some terrorist leaders we have in prison, so Obama could somehow secretly bring Sharia law to the US..... The Russian allegations hold ground, as you put it, because there's a ring of truth to them - and we have yet to get to the bottom of them. It really, really, really would be the best possible outcome if they all turned out to be bogus. All those meetings? Perhaps they were just normal social contacts, maybe setting up potential diplomatic connections for later. The strange timing of the leaks of information detrimental to the Democrats, like campaign manager John Podesta's e-mails coming out within hours after the "Access Hollywood" "hot mike" tape of Trump bragging about committing sexual assault? Possibly pure coincidence! But the investigation has just started, so there's no way of being even remotely certain.
I think you meant to say Republican conspiracies? Im not sure there. But there sure as hell was a lot of damage control when it came to pizzagate. The Benghazi example you gave was a bit of a stretch and Ive never heard anyone theorize what you said. Maybe thats you trying to give someone a bad name. The whole Benghazi thing was about Obama and Hillary lying about it and the fact that they were transferring weapons illegally to Syrian rebels.
Why not look at coincidents that can uncover corruption in the DNC? Loretta lynchs meeting with Bill clinton? Timing of that? timing of the trump leak tape before the debate.
It just seems like liberals want to investigate things that they want and say "oh these have really x3 truth to them!"
7. Why is Wikileaks completely ignored when they release material proving the CIA/NSA has capabilities of being able to hack and leave a trail back to Russia?
Because that's what we expect - and want - the CIA and NSA to be able to do.
Because they would never lie to the American people about who actually hacked something right?8. How many foreign donors did Hillary Clinton and her campaign/foundation have?
Irrelevant. Again, she's not the president. One could also ask how many lives the Clinton Foundation saved, or the many illegal things Trump did with the money raised by his "foundation" (bribing officials, buying junk for his personal use...).
Saudi Arabia donating millions to Clintons [campaign]. If she would have won it aint like there would be this frenzy over who helped her.