*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #405 on: February 10, 2005, 02:41:54 PM »
 
Quote:

  I also recently watched some video calender from a few years ago featuring her and they were literally massive!!!




Would that have been around the time she was in the early stages of pregnancy? There were some quite staggering images taken at around that time.

 
Quote:

 I was thinking maybe this is why she we went so exteme in her latest vid - she knows her boobs aren't what they used to be so she decided to do the full on dirty hardcore thing to make the most of what she's still got??




If they were huge for a very good reason a few years ago it's not completely surprising if they became smaller later - although these things are always relative.  

And who knows? Maybe the reason she did full-on hardcore because someone was extremely persuasive and wouldn't take 'no' for an answer.
 
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff

*

Prophet_Tenebrae

  • Breast Prophet
  • 4113
  • Prophet Of Darkness
    • FTF10 - FTF Superblog
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #406 on: February 10, 2005, 04:22:02 PM »
Yes but at least she hasn't done what some do and say something that doesn't even make any sense - like 150YYY or some such.

*

pulp

  • Banned User
  • 697
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #407 on: February 10, 2005, 04:27:56 PM »
You are thinking of the time when Linsey was PREGNANT.  Yes, they were galaxy class, as opposed to merely world class jubblies. ;-)

*

Craig_Mercer

  • P cup
  • 1403
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #408 on: February 10, 2005, 05:22:32 PM »
Take a long good look, you'll likely NEVER see a natural pair of **29** tits this big for a loooong time if  ever. I will admit she looks like Buddy Hackett's love [censored] in this shot.

 

I've never gotten over Linsey's very first debut in Loaded magazine when she was a huge and still budding catering student. I have the issue and will scan when located.
E N O R M O U S B R E A S T S
S O U S E M O N S T E R B R A
O R B S M E A S U R E T O N S

*

SwitcherX

  • Legend
  • 6989
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #409 on: February 10, 2005, 05:44:40 PM »
Quote:

If they were huge for a very good reason a few years ago it's not completely surprising if they became smaller later - although these things are always relative.  

And who knows? Maybe the reason she did full-on hardcore because someone was extremely persuasive and wouldn't take 'no' for an answer.




I can't help but have the feeling that you know more than you're saying...  
Switcher X
A.K.A. Tina Fey Eichmann

"Thank you herr professor Tina Fey Eichmann, nuclear brain surgeon and moustache jockey."
-- Mammeister


"SwitcherX, you were always Mammeister's favorite...you bastard."
-- Notty

*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #410 on: February 11, 2005, 02:35:13 AM »
 
Quote:

 I can't help but have the feeling that you know more than you're saying...




Whatever gives you that idea?  

Just an educated guess, that's all. We'll all have to wait for the heated denials...
 
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff

*

bgb

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 31
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #411 on: February 11, 2005, 05:22:37 AM »
I have heard in interviews with her that she didn't want to do the hardcore film she did with her then husband, and it was entirely his idea.

*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #412 on: February 11, 2005, 07:18:19 AM »
 
Quote:

 Yes but...




Quite. My query would concern the 36, not the HH. But having said that, if some know-nowt tit-journalist can pluck a number like 36 out of thin air, who is to say the cup-size isn't a fabrication as well?
 
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff

*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #413 on: February 11, 2005, 07:23:54 AM »
Quote:

I will admit she looks like Buddy Hackett's love [censored] in this shot.




It doesn't seem to be her best angle. Two chins and you can see right up her nose. Where do these guys get off, publishing a shot of someone like that? What is their agenda?

 
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #414 on: February 11, 2005, 07:31:15 AM »
Quote:

I have heard in interviews with her that she didn't want to do the hardcore film she did with her then husband, and it was entirely his idea.  




Yeah. I've never wanted to do a hardcore film with any of my wives when there are so many more interesting people around.
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

Hudd

  • G Cup
  • 757
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #415 on: February 11, 2005, 08:05:23 AM »
Quote:

You are thinking of the time when Linsey was PREGNANT.  Yes, they were galaxy class, as opposed to merely world class jubblies. ;-)  




Dear God she looked good then. Not that she's ever looked bad! She just had that magical glow and her boobs were just full to bursting.

*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #416 on: February 11, 2005, 08:59:56 AM »
 
Quote:

Yeah. I've never wanted to do a hardcore film with any of my wives when there are so many more interesting people around.




Yes, that brings a new slant to the conversation.  

Quote:

 She just had that magical glow and her boobs were just full to bursting.




In the full bloom of her womanhood and bursting with rude health...  
 
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff

*

southy

  • G Cup
  • 1171
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #417 on: February 11, 2005, 10:21:34 AM »
I dont think they are shrinking.In fact i was only thinking the other day how well they seem to be lasting,no sagging yet.......

*

southy

  • G Cup
  • 1171
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #418 on: February 11, 2005, 10:31:19 AM »
http://www.rexfeatures.com/cgi-bin/r2show0?k=LINSEY+DAWN&s=lBAAXFP-AToJgGYxj-qYoWL6&u=DEFAULT&p=0000000A248935031&t=000000A6&fNewest.x=16&fNewest.y=4

there's loads here,166 in fact,Rex Features picture ageny search under linsey dawn.
there used to be a hack to get them full size,dont know if its still available.

*

pulp

  • Banned User
  • 697
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #419 on: February 11, 2005, 11:37:48 AM »
"Quite. My query would concern the 36, not the HH"
 
She probably is a 38 but I can believe 36 band size.  She isn't a big/tall/wide girl.