[H_man]

Looks like I need to get to one of these conventions as soon as possible!

[RB]

I wouldn't imagine she's a millionaire. Although, she also worked as a call-girl. Loaded Magazine in the UK caught her out in an undercover report, where she was offering sex sessions with her and her sister - at the same time - for several thousand pounds an hour, and some cocaine thrown in for good measure, so perhaps she made some money from that too?

[Fudo]

Hey, i'm a big Linsey fan... what abaut doing a post dedicated to her with her Bio, movies, works. etc from the beginning to nowdays

Can someone give me some links with information and unseen material on her... surfing on the net and seen that fron when she stopped modelling...
there is not much about her

[fatnadine]

My two cents:

I agree with the previous post in this thread stating that Linsey had Implants and now she stops modelling she had them taken out. Simple as that.look at the pic which I attached, Linsey show proof of silicon implants compared to other silicon boobs. Next  to that she increased so dramatically, i can't be homegrown. Her boobs tended to be saggy when she was young and turned suddenly in very firm monster boobs.....

Got same thoughts on Chloe by the way......

I created a blog with more pics

Picture removed, und3rage content - Salem

[GizmoWidget]

I know that to many here, the claim that Linsey got implants is tantamount to blasphemy, but I agree.  I won't belabor the issue with any justification or evidence of why I think this is the case, I'm just saying that I agree with it.

Now if anyone has any pics of her from back in her Page 3 days in the UK fishwraps, then I'd love to see them.  

[seanster]

I can see where you guys are coming from, but I disagree. The pic posted showing the 'bigger' Linsey is one produced by Score circa 2000. If you remember, Linsey was pregnant at about this time but, tragically, had a miscarriage. From what I remember reading, her pregnancy caused her boobs to swell to epic proportions (just watch the 'Day With Linsey' video to see)around about this time.

In my opinion, Linsey has always been natural. Why would she want to get implants when she already had an amazing rack? From all the footage I have seen of Linsey throughout the years, her breasts looked natural from the way that they sat and moved. Granted, she was smaller in the early years but you have to remember she was only 19 or 20. Often, girls can still grow into their early twenties. I think that was the case with Linsey. Indeed, her biography on imdb.com states that she was still growing at 23!

I can honestly see your point and it has been raised continuously throughout the last few years but I really believe Linsey was always naturally stacked.

[pedonbio]

I agree. Even though it is illegal --tsk, tsk-- for us Yanks to view LDM's pictures from her Page 3 days, my ancient recollection is that she was very similar...

[DJPFC]

This is going to come across potentially rude but I'm going to say it anyway -- there's no way Chloe or Linsey had implants put in at any time.  Anyone who thinks that, with all due respect, really needs to brush up on their boob knowledge.

As for the allegation that women can't get bigger without implants, there's a whole recent thread here:

http://forum.bearchive.com/showflat.php?...0&fpart=all

with Lorna (case in point), Joyce Gibson, and even Maggie Green thast clearly illustrates that it's possible for women to get bigger as they get older.  Pregnancy, weight gain, hormone shifts... it all can and does happen and those who automatically write  such growth off to "implants" really doesn't know what they're talking about.

Again, I hope I didn't offend anyone by saying this but keep in mind also that when a gal is all-natural and stakes her modeling reputation on that claim, accusing them of lying and defrauding their fans is not cool and it's definitely something that I know, from first-hand experience, know that these gals would never do.

[GizmoWidget]

Quote:
with.., Joyce Gibson...

Uh... yeah.  You're joking right?  No implants?  You are one gullible dude... just look at the pics of "Alexis Love" and tell me she's natural.  If you still think so, I've got some rain forest land in Arizona that I'll sell you really cheap...

Not trying to be rude here, but it's blatantly obvious that Joyce Gibson got implanted later in her career.  I'm simply astounded that you claim she never did...

Also, I do know breast physiology; I had two whole years of human physiology getting my Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology.  After a miscarriage, breasts always get smaller, once the hormones that cause lactation are no longer present.  I won't go into in depth here, but the hormones involved are prolactin, progesterone, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, and placental lactogen.   The function of these hormones during pregnancy and that they rapidly decrease to non functional levels after pregnancy and after breast feeding ends is a biological fact, and no personal claims to the contrary can make that not the case.  The only possible way such could happen would be if she were getting injections of these hormones to keep her breasts large.  In such a case, that would be an artificial form of enhancing her breasts because her body would not be producing those hormones themselves.  Again, that her body wouldn't be making them is a simple fact of how human physiology works.

This is the primary reason I agree with the claim above; it simply defies scientific fact, and if you don't want to agree with that, that's entire your choice.  However, you do have a vested interest in buying into the story, so your opinion isn't unbiased on this subject.  

I didn't want to have to put all this out there, as I indicated in my previous post, but it one of the reasons I mentioned that I didn't want to discuss.

[GA_Matt]

Please then explain Isabelle Lanthier?

Also, why are there few signs of scarring? (Lindsey, et al.)

Finally, do tell why it is that some women just develop to be much larger in their middle age?  I'll put it to you like this: You can say a lot of things about medicine, but you learned about ideal circumstances.  Sometimes, glands get turned on, and never really turn off... Sometimes, natural breast enlargement (per my LTGF going from a small 32C to a 38E and staying that way for over 7 years, and being in her 30's) is permanent post-pregnancy.

Absolutes are nice to have, but they rarely track when you talk about the human body.  Believe what you like... I mean, there are still some people that belive this codswallop idea that the earth is round.

[GizmoWidget]

Quote:
Please then explain Isabelle Lanthier?

Also, why are there few signs of scarring? (Lindsey, et al.)

There are methods that don't leave scars.  I don't know what they are, I'm not a plastic surgeon.  But, the more you pay, the better the results you get, particularly with breast enlargement.  She could have done the direct saline injections, which don't require surgery at all.

Quote:
Finally, do tell why it is that some women just develop to be much larger in their middle age?

Metabolism.  For both men and women, metabolism slows down as you age.  For women, the slower metabolism means weight gain if the caloric intake remains constant.  It is a biological fact that women store fat in their breasts (as well as their hips, thighs, and buttocks).

Quote:
I'll put it to you like this: You can say a lot of things about medicine, but you learned about ideal circumstances.

No.  Actually this shows that you need to improve your understanding of how the scientific method works and the process by which facts are established in science.  Biologically, we observe as many possible cases in which we believe a particular physiological mechanism to work.  In this case, that means as many women as possible are studied to verify that the endocrinological mechanisms work the way they seem to.  Thus, the sample is as large as possible, and despite the fact there might be variations from individual to individual, the same process is seen, without exception, in every woman.  Thus, the fact is extracted from a vast number of individual cases, none of which is an "ideal circumstance".

Quote:
Sometimes, glands get turned on, and never really turn off...

And these cases are called "pathological".  That means they are a dysfunction of the biological mechanisms that normally control such processes.  Almost always these kinds of cases are treated medically to get the endocrinological mechanisms working properly again.

Quote:
Sometimes, natural breast enlargement (per my LTGF going from a small 32C to a 38E and staying that way for over 7 years, and being in her 30's) is permanent post-pregnancy.

See my comments above on metabolism.  It is also a fact of biology that pregnancy causes weight gain and slows metabolism.

Quote:
Absolutes are nice to have, but they rarely track when you talk about the human body.

Sorry, see my comments above on the scientific method.

Quote:
Believe what you like... I mean, there are still some people that belive this codswallop idea that the earth is round.

Uh... yeah.  Right.

[Feral]

Quote:
Why would she want to get implants when she already had an amazing rack?

Why not? I am not saying she did, but it would make perfect sense. It turned her into a superstar and made her more fame and fortune. I made this comment in another thread, but what if more already busty women got subtle boobs jobs, like going from a DD to a FF, or a E to a H. Instead of going for all out monster mams? What if these same women claimed to be natural? Would it not get them more notoriety then just the next skin tight as drums big implant model who is fighting both her bank account and FDA regulations in a hopeless arms race that is already won by Chelsea?

[DJPFC]

Gizmo, I appreciate your input -- very thorough and certainly filled with facts I didn't know, as I do not even remotely have a PhD or MD or any "D" for that matter.

That said, I will respectfully disagree with you as I have been doing this long enough to personally know several women who have definitely gotten larger as they've gotten older, whether it's due to pregnancy, weight gain, menopause, that time of the month, or simple development.  Al the medical jargon aside will not change the simple facts I know to be true and have seen with my own eyes. 

First off, I knew Joyce Gibson, as well as a gentlemen who was in a relationship with her, for a while before she permanently retired and I know for fact that she never got implants.  Her boobs simply got a lot bigger when she got older.  The same thing happened to Michelle Angelo.

I also know Lorna Morgan, who remains a HH to this day, well after the birth of her baby.  Her boobs may go smaller or bigger someday, but for now they're much bigger than they were before and that's plenty time in which to snap a simple photo. The viewing of said photo does not instantly mean she got implants, which is what some people in here are trying to argue.  That argument is just wrong, plain and simple.

I also believe the compare/contrast photo of Lindsey in this thread is also highly inaccurate.  The first one is a shot taken of her when she was *redacted* for the UK mags.  It's juxtaposed next to a shot of her when she was in her early 20s (and possibly have been pregnant as wel), which is definitely a time period in which a woman can and often does grow and develop further.  Secondly, shot #2 also has a "fish eye" effect with her boobs closer to the lens than the rest of her, making them look proportionally even bigger. Thirdly, she's also leaning over the lens, to make them look even bigger, while shot #1 is just a simple glamour shot taken with a standard focal length.  All of these are reasons why her boobs look so much bigger in shot #2 vs shot #1.  Those of you who think that this dumb comparison is evidence of implants in Lindsey... I don't know what to say.  I can't help you.

And for those who think CHLOE has had them... well, I've known Chloe for 10 years now, worked with her, photographed her, talk with her regularly and there is NO WAY IN HELL she has them or has ever even considered it.  I don't know how much more plain and clear I can make it.  She's maintained an entire career predicated on being a natural model and she reminas so to this day and any attempts to discredit her to that effect are utter BS.

Thank you -- I've said my peace and feel much better now

[gmantwo]

Gizmo, I have a science background myself and I think the point that is trying to be made is that there is the biological norm, but some women will fall outside that "normal" range and develop differently. I've seen many post-pregnancy women develop breasts much larger that stayed that way years after they stopped lactating. None of these women were models or had any injections to keep their breasts at their max.

When women such as LDM have a "body" of work (pun intended) that continuously shows such obvious evidence of mammary flesh that acts as God intended, one does not question it based on the scientific method; one enjoys the feast for the eyes (and for a select few--much more).

It is my wish that DJ and his ilk continue to find and produce such evidence to our satisfaction.

P.S. Why the sudden interest at the BEA for the real vs. fake controversy? Is it the summer solstice effect? Or is this some other such annual ritual?

[TontoSolid]

i agreen with fatnadine.  it's so obsvious she had implants by the pictures he posted. there's no way those fat titties are real compared to the earlier pics.  those things are fucking stuffed.  and also, i'm not buying the fact that she'd have perfectly natural tits reduced.